FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2899395044> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2899395044 endingPage "e0204886" @default.
• W2899395044 startingPage "e0204886" @default.
• W2899395044 abstract "Background The recruitment and retention of patients are significant methodological challenges for trials. Whilst research has focussed on recruitment, the failure to retain recruited patients and collect outcome data can lead to additional problems and potentially biased results. Research to identify effective retention strategies has focussed on influencing patient behaviour through incentives, reminders and alleviating patient burden, but has not sought to improve patient understanding of the importance of retention. Our aim is to assess how withdrawal, retention and the value of outcome data collection is described within the Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) used during consent. Methods Fifty adult or parent PIL from a cohort of trials starting between 2009–2012 and funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme were obtained from protocols, websites or by contacting trialists. A checklist of PIL content based on Health Research Authority (HRA) and ICH GCP Guidelines was supplemented with retention specific questions. Corresponding protocols were also evaluated to cross reference trial specific procedures with information communicated to patients. Results PIL frequently reiterated the patient’s right to withdraw at any time (n = 49, 98%), without having to give a reason and without penalty (n = 45, 90%). However, few informed patients they may be asked to give a withdrawal reason where willing (n = 6, 12%). Statements about the value of retention were infrequent (n = 8, 16%). Consent documents failed to include key content that might mitigate withdrawals, such as the need for treatment equipoise (n = 3, 6%). Nearly half the trials in the cohort (n = 23, 46%) wanted to continue to collect outcome data if patients withdraw. However, in 70% of PIL using prospective consent, withdrawal was described in generic terms leaving patients unaware of the difference between stopping treatment and all trial involvement. Nineteen (38%) trials offered withdrawing patients the option to delete existing data. Conclusions Withdrawal and retention is poorly described within PIL and addressing this might positively impact levels of patient attrition, reducing missing data. Consent information is unbalanced, focussing on patient’s rights to withdraw without accompanying information that promotes robust consent and sustained participation. With many citing altruistic reasons for participation it is essential that PIL include more information on retention and clarify withdrawal terminology so patients are aware of how they can make a valuable contribution to clinical studies. There is a need to determine how retention can be described to patients to avoid concerns of coercion. Future research is needed to explore whether the absence of information about retention at the time of consent is impacting attrition." @default.
• W2899395044 created "2018-11-09" @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5000981717 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5005968064 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5027870534 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5043629043 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5059408838 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5064629078 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5068789733 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5069439470 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5069474492 @default.
• W2899395044 creator A5072801492 @default.
• W2899395044 date "2018-10-31" @default.
• W2899395044 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2899395044 title "Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets" @default.
• W2899395044 cites W1972478258 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W1973748105 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W1979702774 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W1984417007 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W1985045473 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W1991647783 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W1991760478 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2002325729 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2014580759 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2042336351 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2079031597 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2082801347 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2088327516 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2096865672 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2101111274 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2101536956 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2103368087 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2107982301 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2108263143 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2108992092 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2110140939 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2122096156 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2123248337 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2124048564 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2129530569 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2136415984 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2140245628 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2148570102 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2149007458 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2150233540 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2159625444 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2160962388 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2173696334 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2230795721 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2316523394 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2603257905 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W2752858203 @default.
• W2899395044 cites W4292528167 @default.
• W2899395044 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204886" @default.
• W2899395044 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6209179" @default.
• W2899395044 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30379822" @default.
• W2899395044 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2899395044 type Work @default.
• W2899395044 sameAs 2899395044 @default.
• W2899395044 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2899395044 countsByYear W28993950442019 @default.
• W2899395044 countsByYear W28993950442020 @default.
• W2899395044 countsByYear W28993950442021 @default.
• W2899395044 countsByYear W28993950442022 @default.
• W2899395044 countsByYear W28993950442023 @default.
• W2899395044 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5000981717 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5005968064 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5027870534 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5043629043 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5059408838 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5064629078 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5068789733 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5069439470 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5069474492 @default.
• W2899395044 hasAuthorship W2899395044A5072801492 @default.
• W2899395044 hasBestOaLocation W28993950441 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C2779174308 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C2780553607 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C29122968 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C68122502 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2899395044 hasConcept C72563966 @default.

• next