FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2899446336> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2899446336 endingPage "374" @default.
• W2899446336 startingPage "358" @default.
• W2899446336 abstract "Purpose Sarcasm is often used in everyday speech and writing and is prevalent in online contexts. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the analogy between sarcasm comments from sentiment tools and the human coder. Design/methodology/approach Using the Verbal Irony Procedure, eight human coders were engaged to analyse comments collected from an online commercial page, and a dissimilarity analysis was conducted with sentiment tools. Three constants were tested, namely, polarity from sentiment tools, polarity rating by human coders; and sarcasm-level ratings by human coders. Findings Results found an inconsistent ratio between these three constants. Sentiment tools used did not have the capability or reliability to detect the subtle, contextualized meanings of sarcasm statements that human coders could detect. Further research is required to refine the sentiment tools to enhance their sensitivity and capability. Practical implications With these findings, it is recommended that further research and commercialization efforts be directed at improving current sentiment tools – for example, to incorporate sophisticated human sarcasm texts in their analytical systems. Sarcasm exists frequently in media, politics and human forms of communications in society. Therefore, more highly sophisticated sentiment tools with the abilities to detect human sarcasm would be vital in research and industry. Social implications The findings suggest that presently, of the sentiment tools investigated, most are still unable to pick up subtle contexts within the text which can reverse or change the message that the writer intends to send to his/her receiver. Hence, the use of the relevant hashtags (e.g. #sarcasm; #irony) are of fundamental importance in detection tools. This would aid the evaluation of product reviews online for commercial usage. Originality/value The value of this study lies in its original, empirical findings on the inconsistencies between sentiment tools and human coders in sarcasm detection. The current study proves these inconsistencies are detected between human and sentiment tools in social media texts and points to the inadequacies of current sentiment tools. With these findings, it is recommended that further research and commercialization efforts be directed at improving current sentiment tools – to incorporate sophisticated human sarcasm texts in their analytical systems. The system can then be used as a reference for psychologists, media analysts, researchers and speech writers to detect cues in the inconsistencies in behaviour and language." @default.
• W2899446336 created "2018-11-09" @default.
• W2899446336 creator A5008631127 @default.
• W2899446336 creator A5027093637 @default.
• W2899446336 creator A5035885283 @default.
• W2899446336 creator A5052224101 @default.
• W2899446336 date "2018-10-30" @default.
• W2899446336 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2899446336 title "A comparative study of the effectiveness of sentiment tools and human coding in sarcasm detection" @default.
• W2899446336 cites W1976647541 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W1994630074 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W1994725877 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2007734915 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2024011160 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2030969600 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2038634595 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2085648518 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2095649591 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2119468013 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2131505766 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2257869271 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2272061611 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2290577549 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2325323420 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2325957214 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2388245502 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2390196958 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2424376543 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2489370933 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2496850896 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2498221483 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W2594056497 @default.
• W2899446336 cites W997521977 @default.
• W2899446336 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jsit-12-2017-0120" @default.
• W2899446336 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2899446336 type Work @default.
• W2899446336 sameAs 2899446336 @default.
• W2899446336 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2899446336 countsByYear W28994463362021 @default.
• W2899446336 countsByYear W28994463362023 @default.
• W2899446336 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2899446336 hasAuthorship W2899446336A5008631127 @default.
• W2899446336 hasAuthorship W2899446336A5027093637 @default.
• W2899446336 hasAuthorship W2899446336A5035885283 @default.
• W2899446336 hasAuthorship W2899446336A5052224101 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C2776207355 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C2779975665 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C521332185 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConcept C66402592 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C136764020 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C138885662 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C154945302 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C15744967 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C204321447 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C2776207355 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C2779975665 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C41008148 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C41895202 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C518677369 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C521332185 @default.
• W2899446336 hasConceptScore W2899446336C66402592 @default.
• W2899446336 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2899446336 hasLocation W28994463361 @default.
• W2899446336 hasOpenAccess W2899446336 @default.
• W2899446336 hasPrimaryLocation W28994463361 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W2250204095 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W2807333695 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W2889609628 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W3005641385 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W3107810543 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W4226027325 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W4292707523 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W4312945876 @default.
• W2899446336 hasRelatedWork W3128185314 @default.
• W2899446336 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W2899446336 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2899446336 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2899446336 magId "2899446336" @default.
• W2899446336 workType "article" @default.