FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2899703257> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2899703257 endingPage "861" @default.
• W2899703257 startingPage "861" @default.
• W2899703257 abstract "Over the past few decades, technology has impacted our lives significantly. Most of this has been in our personal space through the development of computing, devices, and social platforms. However, we have also seen the “intrusion” of technology into our workspace. While we embrace some of this technological intrusion, we also resist or rebel against other components. Why have we not seen more successful implementation of information technology in health care? While many theories have been hypothesised, there can be no argument that none have been truly effective. As a result, the health care field is becoming used to “not-so-effective” systems. This is primarily related to a fragmented system and also a slow and often bureaucratic environment. As a result, health care is being identified as a laggard with respect to technological advancement. The adoption of technological advancements, in any industry, varies for a number of reasons and happens along a fairly predictable continuum. When a new technology emerges, there will be people who adopt it at the earliest stages (innovators), early adopters, those in the early majority, those in the late majority, and laggards who resist the adoption altogether. Health care tends to fall in the latter. In general, the reasons for these different rates of adoption are varied. Some see cost as a prohibitive factor, some a lack of trust. Others are simply comfortable with their current way of doing things and do not seek to change. The result is that there is a lack of coordination of technology adoption across health care. Another common example is systems that are not designed to communicate with one another, making it difficult for providers using different technological platforms to share information or transfer data, a very common situation in health care. The health care industry has much to gain by intentionally and intelligently adopting technological practices that can improve outcomes. A well-designed plan of action with the resources in place to make it a success must be crucial components of any technological progress in the health care industry. When it comes to implementing new technology, the health care industry lags behind every other industry sector. It is a well-known fact that the industry appears to resist change, even when those changes stand to significantly benefit patients. In our personal world, where we are constantly engaging with smart devices, often, our health care workplace still uses archaic communication methods such as pagers and faxes. While we may have access to state-of-the art drugs and treatments, often, there is no access to state-of–the-art technology. Can we, the wound care world, lead the way? Can we drive health care to catch up and embrace the technological platforms available to us. As we have had to lead the way in the development of a clinical specialty, it might be opportunistic to tie the two elements together. We have to be innovators anyhow, so why not lead the way including with technology. Can the acceptance of technology in our clinical area, and the drive to join it with existing technological approaches (eg, wound record as part of electronic health record), drive change organisationally that allows the recognition of wound care within the broader environment. Who knows, but it is worth a try for the benefit of clinicians and patients alike." @default.
• W2899703257 created "2018-11-16" @default.
• W2899703257 creator A5066945394 @default.
• W2899703257 creator A5074244141 @default.
• W2899703257 date "2018-11-09" @default.
• W2899703257 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2899703257 title "Can health care catch up with technology" @default.
• W2899703257 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13035" @default.
• W2899703257 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7949846" @default.
• W2899703257 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30412662" @default.
• W2899703257 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2899703257 type Work @default.
• W2899703257 sameAs 2899703257 @default.
• W2899703257 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2899703257 countsByYear W28997032572019 @default.
• W2899703257 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2899703257 hasAuthorship W2899703257A5066945394 @default.
• W2899703257 hasAuthorship W2899703257A5074244141 @default.
• W2899703257 hasBestOaLocation W28997032572 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C125502 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C137996800 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C158251709 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C17409809 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C21333345 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C108827166 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C125502 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C126322002 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C127313418 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C137996800 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C144133560 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C154945302 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C158251709 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C160735492 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C162324750 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C162853370 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C17409809 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C17744445 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C199539241 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C21333345 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C39549134 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C41008148 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C50522688 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C51575053 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C71924100 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C94625758 @default.
• W2899703257 hasConceptScore W2899703257C98184364 @default.
• W2899703257 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2899703257 hasLocation W28997032571 @default.
• W2899703257 hasLocation W28997032572 @default.
• W2899703257 hasOpenAccess W2899703257 @default.
• W2899703257 hasPrimaryLocation W28997032571 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W1412864063 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W1621682276 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W1762982149 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W2094146668 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W2138380304 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W2160104922 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W2214427587 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W2483617102 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2899703257 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2899703257 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W2899703257 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2899703257 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2899703257 magId "2899703257" @default.
• W2899703257 workType "article" @default.