FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2899895551> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2899895551 abstract "The body of the young man seems to be characterized by a specific plasticity. This chrono-individual body modification oftentimes leads the young person to evaluate his own body according to body acquisitions. The relationship between these two variables is far from being sufficiently studied. This paper focuses on examining the self-evaluation of the body according to the physical potential. It covers 181 young people between the ages of 18 and 25, including 84 boys and 97 girls. Body self-judgment of the subjects was measured with a specific scale. In this case, it was measured by the study of Lentillon-Kaestner et al. The physical potential of young people was explored by considering weight, height, Body Mass Index (BMI) and Fat Mass Index (FMI) of the latter. The physical parameters were measured using the scales (weight) and the height gauge (stature). As for the body composition indices, they were calculated from the physical parameters previously indicated. The results obtained, after the comparisons of the subjects with each other, show that young people aged 18-21 years of physical threshold potential exhibit statistically high body self-acceptance frequency to that of their subthreshold potential counterparts and suprathreshold physical potential. Similar results were observed in young people between 22 and 25 years of age. In this group, those with a threshold of physical potential were more acceptable compared to their peers of subthreshold physical potential and supraliminal physical potential. Taking into account sex, girls aged 18 to 21 with a threshold physical potential do not differ from their peers with subthreshold physical potential and suprathreshold physical potential in terms of low body self-acceptance. The results are identical for men aged 18 to 21 and 22 to 25. The meaning of the results does not change when comparing girls with subthreshold physical potential to boys of identical physical potential.The observations made at the latter were repeated when comparing girls to boys of physical threshold potential. In girls aged 22 to 25, girls with subthreshold physical potential and suprathreshold or threshold were superimposed on their male counterparts of subthreshold physical potential and suprathreshold or threshold. This, however, is in regards to the frequency of body self-acceptance. In this sense, the physical potential of the young would not influence the bodily self-evaluation of the latter when the sex intervenes. On the other hand, considering all young people, their physical density varies based on their body self-evaluation." @default.
• W2899895551 created "2018-11-16" @default.
• W2899895551 creator A5009716474 @default.
• W2899895551 creator A5010601157 @default.
• W2899895551 creator A5037221628 @default.
• W2899895551 creator A5089514559 @default.
• W2899895551 date "2018-10-31" @default.
• W2899895551 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2899895551 title "Potentiel Physique et Auto-évaluation Corporelle Chez des Jeunes Étudiants à Abidjan" @default.
• W2899895551 cites W14963657 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W1513516722 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W1552450342 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W2013382765 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W2022304166 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W2088750578 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W2160837179 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W2331411150 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W2413835944 @default.
• W2899895551 cites W836244510 @default.
• W2899895551 doi "https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n30p113" @default.
• W2899895551 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2899895551 type Work @default.
• W2899895551 sameAs 2899895551 @default.
• W2899895551 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2899895551 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2899895551 hasAuthorship W2899895551A5009716474 @default.
• W2899895551 hasAuthorship W2899895551A5010601157 @default.
• W2899895551 hasAuthorship W2899895551A5037221628 @default.
• W2899895551 hasAuthorship W2899895551A5089514559 @default.
• W2899895551 hasBestOaLocation W28998955511 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C171687745 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C138496976 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C142724271 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C144024400 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C149923435 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C15744967 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C171687745 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C1862650 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C2780221984 @default.
• W2899895551 hasConceptScore W2899895551C71924100 @default.
• W2899895551 hasLocation W28998955511 @default.
• W2899895551 hasOpenAccess W2899895551 @default.
• W2899895551 hasPrimaryLocation W28998955511 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W2022567515 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W2084849329 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W2108656736 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W2116605513 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W2153146197 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W2156155264 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W2170668913 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W3109605331 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W3156553555 @default.
• W2899895551 hasRelatedWork W4224941736 @default.
• W2899895551 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2899895551 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2899895551 magId "2899895551" @default.
• W2899895551 workType "article" @default.