FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2900829084> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2900829084 endingPage "1178" @default.
• W2900829084 startingPage "1172" @default.
• W2900829084 abstract "OBJECTIVE Based on a null hypothesis that the use of short-term lumbar drainage (LD) after endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) for intradural pathology does not prevent postoperative CSF leaks, a trial was conducted to assess the effect of postoperative LD on postoperative CSF leak following standard reconstruction. METHODS A prospective, randomized controlled trial of lumbar drain placement after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery was performed from February 2011 to March 2015. All patients had 3-month follow-up data. Surgeons were blinded to which patients would or would not receive the drain until after closure was completed. An a priori power analysis calculation assuming 80% of power, 5% postoperative CSF leak rate in the no-LD group, and 16% in the LD group determined a planned sample size of 186 patients. A routine data and safety check was performed with every 50 patients being recruited to ensure the efficacy of randomization and safety. These interim tests were run by a statistician who was not blinded to the arms they were evaluating. This study accrued 230 consecutive adult patients with skull base pathology who were eligible for endoscopic endonasal resection. Inclusion criteria (high-flow leak) were dural defect greater than 1 cm 2 (mandatory), extensive arachnoid dissection, and/or dissection into a ventricle or cistern. Sixty patients were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. One hundred seventy patients were randomized to either receive or not receive a lumbar drain. RESULTS One hundred seventy patients were randomized, with a mean age of 51.6 years (range 19–86 years) and 38% were male. The mean BMI for the entire cohort was 28.1 kg/m 2 . The experimental cohort with postoperative LD had an 8.2% rate of CSF leak compared to a 21.2% rate in the control group (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.2–7.6, p = 0.017). In 106 patients in whom defect size was measured intraoperatively, a larger defect was associated with postoperative CSF leak (6.2 vs 2.9 cm 2 , p = 0.03). No significant difference was identified in BMI between those with (mean 28.4 ± 4.3 kg/m 2 ) and without (mean 28.1 ± 5.6 kg/m 2 ) postoperative CSF leak (p = 0.79). Furthermore, when patients were grouped based on BMI < 25, 25–29.9, and > 30 kg/m 2 , no difference was noted in the rates of CSF fistula (p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing intradural EES judged to be at high risk for CSF leak as defined by the study’s inclusion criteria, perioperative LD used in the context of vascularized nasoseptal flap closure significantly reduced the rate of postoperative CSF leaks. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03163134 (clinicaltrials.gov)." @default.
• W2900829084 created "2018-11-29" @default.
• W2900829084 creator A5017848559 @default.
• W2900829084 creator A5017877801 @default.
• W2900829084 creator A5045760355 @default.
• W2900829084 creator A5057197633 @default.
• W2900829084 creator A5067534554 @default.
• W2900829084 creator A5072190856 @default.
• W2900829084 creator A5076155625 @default.
• W2900829084 date "2019-10-01" @default.
• W2900829084 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2900829084 title "Does lumbar drainage reduce postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery? A prospective, randomized controlled trial" @default.
• W2900829084 cites W1569821909 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W1969572100 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W1974109670 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W1977405855 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W1985986473 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W1994089073 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W1999210837 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W1999250659 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2004167348 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2012934997 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2026779061 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2027092094 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2027162460 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2036326768 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2040537817 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2045542141 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2057962787 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2058622848 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2059707463 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2061543753 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2061907123 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2073599384 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2081910419 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2083790715 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2086385556 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2093647623 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2126128286 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2130343851 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2133599029 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2166042134 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2234397049 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2291449043 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2292768287 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2410411067 @default.
• W2900829084 cites W2524192309 @default.
• W2900829084 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.jns172447" @default.
• W2900829084 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30485224" @default.
• W2900829084 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2900829084 type Work @default.
• W2900829084 sameAs 2900829084 @default.
• W2900829084 citedByCount "95" @default.
• W2900829084 countsByYear W29008290842019 @default.
• W2900829084 countsByYear W29008290842020 @default.
• W2900829084 countsByYear W29008290842021 @default.
• W2900829084 countsByYear W29008290842022 @default.
• W2900829084 countsByYear W29008290842023 @default.
• W2900829084 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2900829084 hasAuthorship W2900829084A5017848559 @default.
• W2900829084 hasAuthorship W2900829084A5017877801 @default.
• W2900829084 hasAuthorship W2900829084A5045760355 @default.
• W2900829084 hasAuthorship W2900829084A5057197633 @default.
• W2900829084 hasAuthorship W2900829084A5067534554 @default.
• W2900829084 hasAuthorship W2900829084A5072190856 @default.
• W2900829084 hasAuthorship W2900829084A5076155625 @default.
• W2900829084 hasBestOaLocation W29008290841 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C204243189 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C2779115750 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C2779651940 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C2780378346 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConcept C87717796 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C127413603 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C141071460 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C142724271 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C168563851 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C188816634 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C204243189 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C2775862295 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C2779115750 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C2779651940 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C2780378346 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C44575665 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C71924100 @default.
• W2900829084 hasConceptScore W2900829084C87717796 @default.
• W2900829084 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2900829084 hasLocation W29008290841 @default.
• W2900829084 hasLocation W29008290842 @default.
• W2900829084 hasOpenAccess W2900829084 @default.
• W2900829084 hasPrimaryLocation W29008290841 @default.

• next