FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2900963831> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2900963831 endingPage "S23" @default.
• W2900963831 startingPage "S23" @default.
• W2900963831 abstract "Introduction Penicillin skin testing (ST) followed by an oral challenge remains the standard of care to remove the label of penicillin allergy. Despite a negative penicillin allergy evaluation, studies have shown persistence/re-documentation of penicillin allergy upon further follow-up. Methods Inpatients and outpatients evaluated for penicillin allergy from 2012 to 2017 were identified from a retrospective chart review. Patients with a negative allergy evaluation (testing plus challenge) were contacted via phone to complete a follow-up survey regarding their awareness of results and whether they had any subsequent courses of penicillin/penicillin derivatives. Additionally, electronic charts were reviewed and the patient's pharmacy was contacted to assess if the penicillin allergy label remained. Results A total of 33 patients with a negative ST tolerated an oral challenge and were “de-labeled” of their penicillin allergy. Follow up was done with 24 de-labeled patients, and 96% (n=23) recalled the results of their testing accurately. Nine patients were unavailable for follow up. Nine patients reported tolerating subsequent courses of penicillin since their allergy evaluation; however 3 patients were still fearful of a possible reaction and continued to avoid penicillin. The penicillin allergy label was appropriately removed from the EMR in 66.6%(n=22) of patients, and from pharmacy records in 78.7%(n=26) of patients. Conclusions Our study revealed that while penicillin allergy evaluation is safe and effective, there are barriers to removing the penicillin allergy label in clinical practice including patient apprehension and removal of allergy labels from the EMR and pharmacy records. Penicillin skin testing (ST) followed by an oral challenge remains the standard of care to remove the label of penicillin allergy. Despite a negative penicillin allergy evaluation, studies have shown persistence/re-documentation of penicillin allergy upon further follow-up. Inpatients and outpatients evaluated for penicillin allergy from 2012 to 2017 were identified from a retrospective chart review. Patients with a negative allergy evaluation (testing plus challenge) were contacted via phone to complete a follow-up survey regarding their awareness of results and whether they had any subsequent courses of penicillin/penicillin derivatives. Additionally, electronic charts were reviewed and the patient's pharmacy was contacted to assess if the penicillin allergy label remained. A total of 33 patients with a negative ST tolerated an oral challenge and were “de-labeled” of their penicillin allergy. Follow up was done with 24 de-labeled patients, and 96% (n=23) recalled the results of their testing accurately. Nine patients were unavailable for follow up. Nine patients reported tolerating subsequent courses of penicillin since their allergy evaluation; however 3 patients were still fearful of a possible reaction and continued to avoid penicillin. The penicillin allergy label was appropriately removed from the EMR in 66.6%(n=22) of patients, and from pharmacy records in 78.7%(n=26) of patients. Our study revealed that while penicillin allergy evaluation is safe and effective, there are barriers to removing the penicillin allergy label in clinical practice including patient apprehension and removal of allergy labels from the EMR and pharmacy records." @default.
• W2900963831 created "2018-11-29" @default.
• W2900963831 creator A5007184966 @default.
• W2900963831 creator A5019167094 @default.
• W2900963831 creator A5044023211 @default.
• W2900963831 date "2018-11-01" @default.
• W2900963831 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2900963831 title "ASSESSING THE PERSISTENCE OF PENICILLIN ALLERGY LABELS POST ALLERGY EVALUATION" @default.
• W2900963831 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2018.09.069" @default.
• W2900963831 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2900963831 type Work @default.
• W2900963831 sameAs 2900963831 @default.
• W2900963831 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2900963831 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2900963831 hasAuthorship W2900963831A5007184966 @default.
• W2900963831 hasAuthorship W2900963831A5019167094 @default.
• W2900963831 hasAuthorship W2900963831A5044023211 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C174802600 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C207480886 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C2779060952 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C2779779143 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C2910117706 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C126322002 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C16005928 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C167135981 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C170493617 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C174802600 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C187212893 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C203014093 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C207480886 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C2779060952 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C2779779143 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C2910117706 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C501593827 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C71924100 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C86803240 @default.
• W2900963831 hasConceptScore W2900963831C89423630 @default.
• W2900963831 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2900963831 hasLocation W29009638311 @default.
• W2900963831 hasOpenAccess W2900963831 @default.
• W2900963831 hasPrimaryLocation W29009638311 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W1537287281 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W2039668629 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W2079776608 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W2122255653 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W2282266379 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W2290918288 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W2413821946 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W2467104198 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W4299606931 @default.
• W2900963831 hasRelatedWork W4327605894 @default.
• W2900963831 hasVolume "121" @default.
• W2900963831 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2900963831 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2900963831 magId "2900963831" @default.
• W2900963831 workType "article" @default.