FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2901387625> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2901387625 endingPage "32" @default.
• W2901387625 startingPage "20" @default.
• W2901387625 abstract "Abstract Background Traditional simulation‐based education prioritizes participation in simulated scenarios. The educational impact of observation in simulation‐based education compared with participation remains uncertain. Our objective was to compare the performances of observers and participants in a standardized simulation scenario. Methods We assessed learning differences between simulation‐based scenario participation and observation using a convergent, parallel, quasi‐experimental, mixed‐methods study of 15 participants and 15 observers ( N = 30). Fifteen first‐year residents from six medical specialties were evaluated during a simulated scenario (cardiac arrest due to critical hyperkalemia). Evaluation included predefined critical actions and performance assessments. In the first exposure to the simulation scenario, participants and observers underwent a shared postevent debriefing with predetermined learning objectives. Three months later, a follow‐up assessment using the same case scenario evaluated all 30 learners as participants. Wilcoxon signed rank and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare participants and observers at 3‐month follow‐up. In addition, we used case study methodology to explore the nature of learning for participants and observers. Data were triangulated using direct observations, reflective field notes, and a focus group. Results Quantitative data analysis comparing the learners’ first and second exposure to the investigation scenario demonstrated participants’ time to calcium administration as the only statistically significant difference between participant and observer roles (316 seconds vs. 200 seconds, p = 0.0004). Qualitative analysis revealed that both participation and observation improved learning, debriefing was an important component to learning, and debriefing closed the learning gap between observers and participants. Conclusions Participants and observers had similar performances in simulation‐based learning in an isolated scenario of cardiac arrest due to hyperkalemia. Findings support current limited literature that observation should not be underestimated as an important opportunity to enhance simulation‐based education. When paired with postevent debriefing, scenario observers and participants may reap similar educational benefits." @default.
• W2901387625 created "2018-11-29" @default.
• W2901387625 creator A5006432336 @default.
• W2901387625 creator A5011014127 @default.
• W2901387625 creator A5016588269 @default.
• W2901387625 creator A5023525006 @default.
• W2901387625 creator A5025067461 @default.
• W2901387625 creator A5040127803 @default.
• W2901387625 creator A5062741508 @default.
• W2901387625 creator A5066923987 @default.
• W2901387625 date "2018-12-21" @default.
• W2901387625 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2901387625 title "A Mixed-methods Comparison of Participant and Observer Learner Roles in Simulation Education" @default.
• W2901387625 cites W1832843307 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W1928786663 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W1965774585 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W1971239475 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W1980241109 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W1983508733 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W1983569614 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W1986481813 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2027973779 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2076117129 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2134031328 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2134430791 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2137852255 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2156444498 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2239320364 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2322007582 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2322141813 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2324130177 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2332192919 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2603420834 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2767916016 @default.
• W2901387625 cites W2901387625 @default.
• W2901387625 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10310" @default.
• W2901387625 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6339532" @default.
• W2901387625 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30680344" @default.
• W2901387625 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2901387625 type Work @default.
• W2901387625 sameAs 2901387625 @default.
• W2901387625 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2901387625 countsByYear W29013876252019 @default.
• W2901387625 countsByYear W29013876252020 @default.
• W2901387625 countsByYear W29013876252021 @default.
• W2901387625 countsByYear W29013876252022 @default.
• W2901387625 countsByYear W29013876252023 @default.
• W2901387625 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2901387625 hasAuthorship W2901387625A5006432336 @default.
• W2901387625 hasAuthorship W2901387625A5011014127 @default.
• W2901387625 hasAuthorship W2901387625A5016588269 @default.
• W2901387625 hasAuthorship W2901387625A5023525006 @default.
• W2901387625 hasAuthorship W2901387625A5025067461 @default.
• W2901387625 hasAuthorship W2901387625A5040127803 @default.
• W2901387625 hasAuthorship W2901387625A5062741508 @default.
• W2901387625 hasAuthorship W2901387625A5066923987 @default.
• W2901387625 hasBestOaLocation W29013876252 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C202695956 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C206041023 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C2780704645 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C121332964 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C144133560 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C15744967 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C162853370 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C19417346 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C202695956 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C206041023 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C2780704645 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C47177190 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C56995899 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C62520636 @default.
• W2901387625 hasConceptScore W2901387625C77805123 @default.
• W2901387625 hasFunder F4320310298 @default.
• W2901387625 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2901387625 hasLocation W29013876251 @default.
• W2901387625 hasLocation W29013876252 @default.
• W2901387625 hasLocation W29013876253 @default.
• W2901387625 hasLocation W29013876254 @default.
• W2901387625 hasOpenAccess W2901387625 @default.
• W2901387625 hasPrimaryLocation W29013876251 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W1996013892 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W2046487379 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W2081374963 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W2141256500 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W2416870407 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W2897787797 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2901387625 hasRelatedWork W2946478274 @default.

• next