FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2901467710> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2901467710 endingPage "824" @default.
• W2901467710 startingPage "820" @default.
• W2901467710 abstract "Background Mesh weight is a possible contributor to quality-of-life outcomes after inguinal hernia repair. This study compares lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Methods A prospective, single-center, hernia-specific database was queried for all adult laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three-dimensional contoured mesh (3-D Max, Bard, Inc, New Providence, NJ) from 1999 to June 2016. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed. Quality of life was evaluated preoperatively and after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months, using the Carolinas Comfort Scale. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results A total of 1,424 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were performed with three-dimensional contoured mesh, with 804 patients receiving lightweight mesh and 620 receiving heavyweight mesh. Patients receiving lightweight mesh were somewhat younger (52.6 ± 14.8 years vs 56.3 ± 13.7 years, P < .0001), with slightly lower body mass indices (26.4 ± 9.9 vs 27.1 ± 4.3, P < .0001). Lightweight mesh was used less often in incarcerated hernias (12.5% vs 16.8%, P = .02). There were a total of 3 surgical site infections. There were no differences in complications between groups except for seroma. Although on univariate analysis, seromas appeared to occur more frequently with heavyweight mesh (21.5% vs 7.9%). On multivariate analysis, heavyweight mesh was not independently associated with seroma formation. Average follow-up was 20 months. Recurrence rates were similar between lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh (0.7 vs 0.6% P > .05). At all points of follow-up (4 week to 3 years), quality-of-life outcomes of discomfort, mesh sensation, and movement limitation scores were similar between lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh. Conclusion Contoured lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair yield excellent recurrence rates and no difference in postoperative complications or quality of life. Considering the lack of outcome difference with long-term follow-up, heavyweight mesh may be considered for use in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair patients. Mesh weight is a possible contributor to quality-of-life outcomes after inguinal hernia repair. This study compares lightweight mesh versus heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A prospective, single-center, hernia-specific database was queried for all adult laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three-dimensional contoured mesh (3-D Max, Bard, Inc, New Providence, NJ) from 1999 to June 2016. Demographics and outcomes were analyzed. Quality of life was evaluated preoperatively and after 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months, using the Carolinas Comfort Scale. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed. A total of 1,424 laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were performed with three-dimensional contoured mesh, with 804 patients receiving lightweight mesh and 620 receiving heavyweight mesh. Patients receiving lightweight mesh were somewhat younger (52.6 ± 14.8 years vs 56.3 ± 13.7 years, P < .0001), with slightly lower body mass indices (26.4 ± 9.9 vs 27.1 ± 4.3, P < .0001). Lightweight mesh was used less often in incarcerated hernias (12.5% vs 16.8%, P = .02). There were a total of 3 surgical site infections. There were no differences in complications between groups except for seroma. Although on univariate analysis, seromas appeared to occur more frequently with heavyweight mesh (21.5% vs 7.9%). On multivariate analysis, heavyweight mesh was not independently associated with seroma formation. Average follow-up was 20 months. Recurrence rates were similar between lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh (0.7 vs 0.6% P > .05). At all points of follow-up (4 week to 3 years), quality-of-life outcomes of discomfort, mesh sensation, and movement limitation scores were similar between lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh. Contoured lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair yield excellent recurrence rates and no difference in postoperative complications or quality of life. Considering the lack of outcome difference with long-term follow-up, heavyweight mesh may be considered for use in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair patients." @default.
• W2901467710 created "2018-11-29" @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5045264062 @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5045723721 @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5047490829 @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5049499403 @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5071372260 @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5073257422 @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5079128502 @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5086297073 @default.
• W2901467710 creator A5091791695 @default.
• W2901467710 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2901467710 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2901467710 title "Long-term assessment of surgical and quality-of-life outcomes between lightweight and standard (heavyweight) three-dimensional contoured mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair" @default.
• W2901467710 cites W1984944068 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W1991503345 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W1993346141 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2003964515 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2007518682 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2013628568 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2031276386 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2031911562 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2040954844 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2047149739 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2050399011 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2058487479 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2069118042 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2069748136 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2074764352 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2089314364 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2097707185 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2109475357 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2116568112 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2145168912 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2294254998 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2331211976 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2523163116 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2537076586 @default.
• W2901467710 cites W2743857278 @default.
• W2901467710 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.10.016" @default.
• W2901467710 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30449696" @default.
• W2901467710 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2901467710 type Work @default.
• W2901467710 sameAs 2901467710 @default.
• W2901467710 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2901467710 countsByYear W29014677102019 @default.
• W2901467710 countsByYear W29014677102020 @default.
• W2901467710 countsByYear W29014677102022 @default.
• W2901467710 countsByYear W29014677102023 @default.
• W2901467710 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5045264062 @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5045723721 @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5047490829 @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5049499403 @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5071372260 @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5073257422 @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5079128502 @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5086297073 @default.
• W2901467710 hasAuthorship W2901467710A5091791695 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C144301174 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C2776724281 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C2779270285 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C2779409168 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C2781132756 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C126322002 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C141071460 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C144301174 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C2776724281 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C2779096551 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C2779270285 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C2779409168 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C2781132756 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C38180746 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C61434518 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C71924100 @default.
• W2901467710 hasConceptScore W2901467710C81182388 @default.
• W2901467710 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2901467710 hasLocation W29014677101 @default.
• W2901467710 hasLocation W29014677102 @default.
• W2901467710 hasOpenAccess W2901467710 @default.
• W2901467710 hasPrimaryLocation W29014677101 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W2067228989 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W2109755117 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W2155269670 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W2360707929 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W2418386809 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W2464034727 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W2742749420 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W3119803435 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W4317435576 @default.
• W2901467710 hasRelatedWork W4386093404 @default.

• next