FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2901717921> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2901717921 abstract "Nonverbal cues are important elements of persuasive communication whose influence in political debates are receiving renewed attention. Recent advances in political debate research have been driven by biologically grounded explanations of behavior that draw on evolutionary theory and view televised debates as contests for social dominance. The application of biobehavioral coding to televised presidential debates opens new vistas for investigating this time-honored campaign tradition by introducing a systematic and readily replicated analytical framework for documenting the unspoken signals that are a continuous feature of competitive candidate encounters. As research utilizing biobehavioral measures of presidential debates and other political communication progresses, studies are becoming increasingly characterized by the use of multiple methodologies and merging of disparate data into combined systems of coding that support predictive modeling. Key elements of nonverbal persuasion include candidate appearance, communication style and behavior, as well as gender dynamics that regulate candidate interactions. Together, the use of facial expressions, voice tone, and bodily gestures form uniquely identifiable display repertoires that candidates perform within televised debate settings. Also at play are social and political norms that govern candidate encounters. From an evaluative standpoint, the visual equivalent of a verbal gaffe is the commission of a nonverbal expectancy violation, which draws viewer attention and interferes with information intake. Through second screens, viewers are able to register their reactions to candidate behavior in real time, and merging biobehavioral and social media approaches to debate effects is showing how such activity can be used as an outcome measure to assess the efficacy of candidate nonverbal communication during televised presidential debates. Methodological approaches employed to investigate nonverbal cues in presidential debates have expanded well beyond the time-honored technique of content analysis to include lab experiments, focus groups, continuous response measurement, eye tracking, vocalic analysis, biobehavioral coding, and use of the Facial Action Coding System to document the muscle movements that comprise leader expressions. Given the tradeoffs and myriad considerations involved in analyzing nonverbal cues, critical issues in measurement and methodology must be addressed when conducting research in this evolving area. With automated coding of nonverbal behavior just around the corner, future research should be designed to take advantage of the growing number of methodological advances in this rapidly evolving area of political communication research." @default.
• W2901717921 created "2018-11-29" @default.
• W2901717921 creator A5008696470 @default.
• W2901717921 creator A5049531067 @default.
• W2901717921 date "2018-08-28" @default.
• W2901717921 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2901717921 title "The Personalization of Campaigns: Nonverbal Cues in Presidential Debates" @default.
• W2901717921 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.52" @default.
• W2901717921 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2901717921 type Work @default.
• W2901717921 sameAs 2901717921 @default.
• W2901717921 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2901717921 countsByYear W29017179212018 @default.
• W2901717921 countsByYear W29017179212020 @default.
• W2901717921 countsByYear W29017179212022 @default.
• W2901717921 countsByYear W29017179212023 @default.
• W2901717921 crossrefType "book" @default.
• W2901717921 hasAuthorship W2901717921A5008696470 @default.
• W2901717921 hasAuthorship W2901717921A5049531067 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConcept C145633318 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConcept C2781310500 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConceptScore W2901717921C145633318 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConceptScore W2901717921C15744967 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConceptScore W2901717921C180747234 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConceptScore W2901717921C2781310500 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConceptScore W2901717921C46312422 @default.
• W2901717921 hasConceptScore W2901717921C77805123 @default.
• W2901717921 hasLocation W29017179211 @default.
• W2901717921 hasOpenAccess W2901717921 @default.
• W2901717921 hasPrimaryLocation W29017179211 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W1539299765 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W1975789944 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W2080447168 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W2082477038 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W2389942703 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W297942156 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W4237967043 @default.
• W2901717921 hasRelatedWork W798803109 @default.
• W2901717921 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2901717921 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2901717921 magId "2901717921" @default.
• W2901717921 workType "book" @default.