FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2902016307> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2902016307 endingPage "418" @default.
• W2902016307 startingPage "411" @default.
• W2902016307 abstract "Theater; or, Looking beyond Plays and Places Amy E. Hughes (bio) Alas: some readers, having read nothing but my title, are already annoyed with me. This is because many US theater practitioners, professors, and aficionados have surprisingly strong opinions about how theater should be spelled. The subject comes up perennially and persistently in articles, blog posts, and conference panels.1 It seems the spelling debate gained considerable rigor in 1962, when the New York Times quietly changed its editorial policy to use theater instead of theatre—even going so far as to correct the names of theaters that called themselves Theatres.2 But the dispute can be traced back to 1789, when Noah Webster advocated for a pronunciation-based approach to US spelling in his Dissertations on the English Language. Observing that the spelling of French words had been retained even though they were pronounced differently in English, Webster complained, Ought [the Americans] at once to reform these abuses, and introduce order and regularity into the orthography of the AMERICAN TONGUE?3 He answered his own call in the American Dictionary of the English Language (1828), offering postcolonial alternatives to the spellings of many British (cum French) words. When Chauncey A. Goodrich revised Webster's Dictionary in 1847, he formalized this orthographic philosophy by proclaiming in the preface that the re in centre, metre, and other words of this class should be transposed.4 But in contrast to centre and metre, the debate over theatre's ending is far from over. As director and theater historian Francis Hodge once observed, There is an emotional context that surrounds this word that has made and will continue to make a shift to the-er spelling difficult.5 Further [End Page 411] complicating the matter is the insistence by some that theatre and theater are not merely variant spellings but actually two different words, with the former referring to the art form (and, concomitantly, the body of work it generates) and the latter referring to a place where plays are performed.6 I rehearse this history not because it is interesting but because it is revealing: the theater inspires fervent passion, intense loyalty, even cliquish elitism in those who love and study it. Proponents of the idea to embrace both spellings—theatre as play, theater as place—illustrate this most clearly. As architecture and activity, edifice and event, refuge and recreation, the theater is deeply beloved. However, we need more definitions when looking at the nineteenth century, when the theater was also a performance practice, a form of labor, and a community. By attending to these connotations, the chaotic complexities of nineteenth-century US theater culture can be seen more clearly: the eclectic amusements staged in playhouses, the diverse work and workers involved in theatrical enterprises, and the dynamic camaraderie that sustained theater/s. Such nuances expose enduring biases in historiography—among them, a tendency to privilege literary legibility over quotidian praxis; a continuing emphasis on the rich, white, and famous; and a benign neglect of the communal processes that shaped nineteenth-century US cultural production. The literature most closely associated with theater is the so-called legitimate drama: narrative-based plays that were professionally produced and/or published. Yet records of actual performances, such as promptbooks marked up by actors and stage managers, suggest that scripts served merely as starting points. Promptbooks exhibit a wide range of alterations—scenes rearranged, large swathes of dialogue omitted, or entire characters removed to meet the needs of a company. Managers frequently reduced five-act plays to four, three, two, or even one act, depending on what the evening's bill would accommodate or what the audience would tolerate. Even promptbooks cannot fully capture what happened on stage. Actors added personal flourishes or points to impress the audience, and often, they were imperfect in their parts due to last-minute casting changes and the limited time they had to memorize lines. Their improvised dialogue is undocumented, except for scattered anecdotes in diaries and autobiographies. Additionally, many scripts have been completely lost, for the simple reason that they were never intended to be kept. Sassy parodies; saccharine patriotic skits; [End Page 412] slapdash dramatizations of..." @default.
• W2902016307 created "2018-12-11" @default.
• W2902016307 creator A5032110145 @default.
• W2902016307 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2902016307 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2902016307 title "Theater; or, Looking beyond Plays and Places" @default.
• W2902016307 cites W2312223624 @default.
• W2902016307 cites W2465413231 @default.
• W2902016307 cites W624932175 @default.
• W2902016307 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jnc.2018.0030" @default.
• W2902016307 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2902016307 type Work @default.
• W2902016307 sameAs 2902016307 @default.
• W2902016307 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2902016307 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2902016307 hasAuthorship W2902016307A5032110145 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C136815107 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C150670947 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C2777801307 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C2780844864 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C2780957641 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C111472728 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C124952713 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C136815107 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C138885662 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C142362112 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C144024400 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C150670947 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C19165224 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C2777801307 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C2780844864 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C2780957641 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C41895202 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C554936623 @default.
• W2902016307 hasConceptScore W2902016307C95457728 @default.
• W2902016307 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2902016307 hasLocation W29020163071 @default.
• W2902016307 hasOpenAccess W2902016307 @default.
• W2902016307 hasPrimaryLocation W29020163071 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W1982854633 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W1987650667 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W2150879894 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W2202740672 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W2555994981 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W2581304708 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W3199009862 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W58251214 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W586335150 @default.
• W2902016307 hasRelatedWork W2072045033 @default.
• W2902016307 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W2902016307 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2902016307 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2902016307 magId "2902016307" @default.
• W2902016307 workType "article" @default.