FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2902625519> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2902625519 abstract "Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has a wide applicability in oncology, cardiology and neurology. However, a major drawback when imaging very active regions such as the bladder is the spill-in effect, leading to inaccurate quantification and obscured visualisation of nearby lesions. Therefore, this study aims at investigating and correcting for the spill-in effect from high-activity regions to the surroundings as a function of activity in the hot region, lesion size and location, system resolution and application of post-filtering using a recently proposed background correction technique. This study involves analytical simulations for the digital XCAT2 phantom and validation acquiring NEMA phantom and patient data with the GE Signa PET/MR scanner. Reconstructions were done using the ordered subset expectation maximisation (OSEM) algorithm. Dedicated point-spread function (OSEM+PSF) and a recently proposed background correction (OSEM+PSF+BC) were incorporated into the reconstruction for spill-in correction. The standardised uptake values (SUV) were compared for all reconstruction algorithms.The simulation study revealed that lesions within 15-20 mm from the hot region were predominantly affected by the spill-in effect, leading to an increased bias and impaired lesion visualisation within the region. For OSEM, lesion SUVmax converged to the true value at low bladder activity, but as activity increased, there was an overestimation as much as 19% for proximal lesions (distance around 15-20 mm from the bladder edge) and 2-4% for distant lesions (distance larger than 20 mm from the bladder edge). As bladder SUV increases, the % SUV change for proximal lesions is about 31% and 6% for SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively, showing that the spill-in effect is more evident for the SUVmax than the SUVmean. Also, the application of post-filtering resulted in up to 65% increment in the spill-in effect around the bladder edges. For proximal lesions, PSF has no major improvement over OSEM because of the spill-in effect, coupled with the blurring effect by post-filtering. Within two voxels around the bladder, the spill-in effect in OSEM is 42% (32%), while for OSEM+PSF, it is 31% (19%), with (and without) post-filtering, respectively. But with OSEM+PSF+BC, the spill-in contribution from the bladder was relatively low (below 5%, either with or without post-filtering). These results were further validated using the NEMA phantom and patient data for which OSEM+PSF+BC showed about 70-80% spill-in reduction around the bladder edges and increased contrast-to-noise ratio up to 36% compared to OSEM and OSEM+PSF reconstructions without post-filtering.The spill-in effect is dependent on the activity in the hot region, lesion size and location, as well as post-filtering; and this is more evident in SUVmax than SUVmean. However, the recently proposed background correction method facilitates stability in quantification and enhances the contrast in lesions with low uptake." @default.
• W2902625519 created "2018-12-11" @default.
• W2902625519 creator A5027493848 @default.
• W2902625519 creator A5036699530 @default.
• W2902625519 creator A5065782051 @default.
• W2902625519 creator A5072421753 @default.
• W2902625519 creator A5088635476 @default.
• W2902625519 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2902625519 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2902625519 title "Validation of the physiological background correction method for the suppression of the spill-in effect near highly radioactive regions in positron emission tomography" @default.
• W2902625519 cites W1889420682 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W1900119591 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W1936575588 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W1965048435 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W1978346985 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W1983281817 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W1984520119 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W1985840130 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2011514769 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2021729604 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2029375357 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2032558388 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2049537588 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2054237734 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2055483062 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2064173428 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2067350700 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2080500950 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2095272243 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2095520368 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2096957883 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2113390297 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2116983290 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2125161228 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2127216762 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2143798108 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2147025455 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2154040828 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2156216752 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2158025968 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2162423957 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2163863351 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2166208465 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2222684879 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2281211957 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2282946738 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2337912037 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2344182582 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2416073795 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2463848034 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2574070773 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2587039906 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2744831393 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2755914312 @default.
• W2902625519 cites W2785382859 @default.
• W2902625519 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0233-8" @default.
• W2902625519 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6281548" @default.
• W2902625519 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30519974" @default.
• W2902625519 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2902625519 type Work @default.
• W2902625519 sameAs 2902625519 @default.
• W2902625519 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2902625519 countsByYear W29026255192018 @default.
• W2902625519 countsByYear W29026255192019 @default.
• W2902625519 countsByYear W29026255192020 @default.
• W2902625519 countsByYear W29026255192021 @default.
• W2902625519 countsByYear W29026255192022 @default.
• W2902625519 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2902625519 hasAuthorship W2902625519A5027493848 @default.
• W2902625519 hasAuthorship W2902625519A5036699530 @default.
• W2902625519 hasAuthorship W2902625519A5065782051 @default.
• W2902625519 hasAuthorship W2902625519A5072421753 @default.
• W2902625519 hasAuthorship W2902625519A5088635476 @default.
• W2902625519 hasBestOaLocation W29026255191 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C2775842073 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C2779751349 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C69179731 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C104293457 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C121332964 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C142724271 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C154945302 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C19527891 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C2775842073 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C2779751349 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C2781156865 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C2989005 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C41008148 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C69179731 @default.
• W2902625519 hasConceptScore W2902625519C71924100 @default.
• W2902625519 hasFunder F4320307065 @default.
• W2902625519 hasFunder F4320320006 @default.

• next