FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2903235105> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2903235105 abstract "In addition to assessing the absolute performance of animals, the impact of certain technological approaches, breeding influence and other external organized factors on the consolidation of pigs groups on certain grounds should be evaluated. Breeding consolidation is a desirable breeding process that is realized through more motivated consolidation of intra-breeding structural units for maintaining a significant level of intergroup differentiation and variability. If the issue relates to the rearing young animals that are introduced into the herd, this is the most urgent issue that needs to be monitored. The purpose of the research is to determine the consociality of the main signs of reproductive ability of the gilts, which are checked at different rates of artificial insemination of sows of the main herd. The research was carried out at the Shubs`ke farm in the Bogoduhivsky District of Kharkiv Oblast at the pig farm for the pure breeding of the Welsh breed pigs (breeding reproductive status from 2014). In order to evaluate the optimal multiplicity (from single to triple), a gilts with a total of 30 heads was selected. The main indicators of reproductive ability of gilts (multiplicity, weight of nest at birth and excommunication and keeping piglets before weaning on day 28) were evaluated. Recalculation on the weight of the litter at weaning at the weight of the nest at extermination in 60 days was carried out in accordance with the current instruction on the boning of pigs. The results of researches were worked out according to traditional methods by the method of variation statistics. Consolidation of individual indicators of reproductive capacity of gilts was calculated to the total number of evaluated animals. In the previous stage of the research, it was found that the use of multiple insemination of gilts compared to single insemination is positively reflected at the level of their reproductive ability. A decrease in the percentage of non-productive inseminants in animal groups has been established. Triple insemination of gilts allows for 1.14 piglets to be obtained more compared to single insemination of the same pigs (p < 0.01). Also, for three times insemination of gilts, in comparison with single insemination, larger nest for weaning were obtained (by 14.24 kg, converted to 60th day p < 0.01). At the same time, the reduction in the keeping of piglets to weaning for increase frequency of insemination of gilts. According to the multiplicity of gilts, the most consolidated level of symptoms per group was obtained for single insemination. Increasing the multiplicity of insemination negatively affected the consolidation of the multiplicity of the piglets (as for determining the coefficients of phenotypic consolidation due to the mean square deviation, so, and for determining the coefficient of variability). The least consolidated in terms of multiplicity were uterus for double insemination. It should also be noted that there is little difference, in general, on the indicators of the theonotypical consolidation of the multiplicity of piglets between different groups of animals. So this difference between the most contrasting groups was 0.447 points for determining the coefficients due to the mean square deviation and 0.397 points for the determination due to the coefficient of variability, respectively. By weight of the same litters at birth, the most consolidated group was gilts, which was inseminated twice. The least consolidated are trimmed three times, respectively. The difference as a whole, according to the indicators of the theonotype consolidation of the mass of the litter’s piglets at birth, between different groups of pigs was even smaller. The difference between the most contrasting groups was 0.270 points for determining the coefficients due to the mean square deviation and 0.260 points for the determination due to the coefficient of variability, respectively. On the basis of the mass of the litter at weaning, the most consolidated level of symptoms was obtained in the group of gilts for triple insemination. The least consolidated group, respectively, was gilts for single insemination. At the same time, on the basis of the weight of the litter at weaning, the slightest differences were obtained after the consolidation of the signs between different groups of pigs. The difference between the most contrasting groups was 0.173 points for determining the coefficients due to the mean square deviation and 0.248 points for the determination due to the coefficient of variation, respectively. At different rates of insemination of gilts, there are no significant differences between the groups between the groups in terms of the consolidation of signs of reproductive ability. Also, there was no clear effect on increasing the multiplicity of insemination of gilts to the consolidation of their signs of reproductive qualities." @default.
• W2903235105 created "2018-12-11" @default.
• W2903235105 creator A5018963183 @default.
• W2903235105 creator A5030393821 @default.
• W2903235105 date "2018-12-04" @default.
• W2903235105 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2903235105 title "INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT VERSIONS ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION OF GILTS OF THEIR TRAITS OF THE REPRODUCTIVE ABILITY CONSOLIDATION" @default.
• W2903235105 cites W2902536857 @default.
• W2903235105 cites W891950406 @default.
• W2903235105 doi "https://doi.org/10.31073/abg.56.17" @default.
• W2903235105 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2903235105 type Work @default.
• W2903235105 sameAs 2903235105 @default.
• W2903235105 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2903235105 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2903235105 hasAuthorship W2903235105A5018963183 @default.
• W2903235105 hasAuthorship W2903235105A5030393821 @default.
• W2903235105 hasBestOaLocation W29032351051 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C194775826 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C2776482104 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C2777005246 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C2778610407 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C2779429622 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C2780655333 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C140793950 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C18903297 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C194775826 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C2776482104 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C2777005246 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C2778610407 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C2779234561 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C2779429622 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C2780655333 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C54355233 @default.
• W2903235105 hasConceptScore W2903235105C86803240 @default.
• W2903235105 hasLocation W29032351051 @default.
• W2903235105 hasOpenAccess W2903235105 @default.
• W2903235105 hasPrimaryLocation W29032351051 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W10355655 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W17212134 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W26059226 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W29365654 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W33454384 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W33899661 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W35071464 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W35117685 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W7186877 @default.
• W2903235105 hasRelatedWork W7473553 @default.
• W2903235105 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2903235105 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2903235105 magId "2903235105" @default.
• W2903235105 workType "article" @default.