FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2904014554> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2904014554 endingPage "93" @default.
• W2904014554 startingPage "93" @default.
• W2904014554 abstract "<p>Reksa dana saham merupakan reksa dana yang menawarkan keuntungan yang tinggi namun juga memiliki risiko yang tinggi karena dipengaruhi oleh fluktuasi yakni penurunan harga saham yang dipengaruhi mekanisme pasar di bursa efek. Oleh karena itu para calon investor harus memiliki pengetahuan dalam memilih reksa dana mana yang akan dipilih. Dalam penelitian ini ingin membandingkan antara metode pengukuran kinerja Treynor, Sharpe, dan Jensen. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui ranking kinerja reksa dana saham yang dihasilkan menggunakan ketiga metode tersebut, membandingkan kinerja reksa dana saham dengan suatu standar pengukuran (<em>benchmark</em>) yaitu kinerja IHSG, dan kemudian untuk mengetahui ada atau tidaknya perbedaan ranking yang dihasilkan oleh ketiga metode tersebut. Berdasarkan hasil penilaian kinerja dengan metode Sharpe, jika dibandingkan dengan IHSG sebagai <em>benchmark</em>, sebanyak 17 (18,5 persen) reksa dana memiliki kinerja yang <em>outperform</em> atau kinerjanya di atas kinerja portofolio pasar. Sisanya sebanyak 75 reksa dana ditemukan <em>underperform</em> atau kinerjanya di bawah portofolio pasar. Hasil penilaian kinerja dengan metode Treynor dan Jensen, sebanyak 33 (35,87 persen) reksa dana memiliki kinerja yang <em>outperform</em> atau kinerjanya di atas kinerja portofolio pasar. Sisanya sebanyak 59 reksa dana ditemukan <em>underperform. </em>Reksa dana yang <em>outperform</em> dapat dipertimbangkan oleh investor sebagai alternatif investasi. Dari hasil pengujian statistik mengenai perbedaan ranking kinerja reksa dana dengan menggunakan metode Sharpe, Treynor, dan Jensen, dapat disimpulkan bahwa ketiga metode penilaian kinerja tidak menghasilkan ranking kinerja yang berbeda-beda secara signifikan</p><p> </p><p><em>Equity funds are mutual funds that offer high profits but also have a high risk because they are influenced by fluctuations in the decline in stock prices which are influenced by market mechanisms on the stock exchange. Therefore, potential investors must have knowledge in choosing which mutual fund to choose. In this study wanted to compare the performance measurement methods of Treynor, Sharpe, and Jensen. The purpose of this study was to determine the ranking performance of equity funds generated using these three methods, compare the performance of equity funds with a benchmark standard, namely the JCI performance, and then to find out whether or not there are ranking differences generated by these three methods. . Based on the results of the performance evaluation with the Sharpe method, when compared with the JCI as a benchmark, as many as 17 (18.5 percent) mutual funds have outperformed performance or performance above the market portfolio performance. The results of the performance appraisal with the Treynor and Jensen methods, as many as 33 (35.87 percent) mutual funds have outperformed performance or performance above the market portfolio performance. Mutual funds that are outperformed can be considered by investors as an alternative investment. From the results of statistical tests regarding differences in the ranking of mutual fund performance using the Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen methods, it can be concluded that the three methods of performance appraisal do not produce performance ratings that differ significantly.</em><em></em></p>" @default.
• W2904014554 created "2018-12-22" @default.
• W2904014554 creator A5059668684 @default.
• W2904014554 creator A5075497832 @default.
• W2904014554 creator A5077467537 @default.
• W2904014554 creator A5091388568 @default.
• W2904014554 date "2018-08-28" @default.
• W2904014554 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2904014554 title "PERBANDINGAN KINERJA REKSA DANA SAHAM DENGAN METODE SHARPE, TREYNOR, DAN JENSEN" @default.
• W2904014554 doi "https://doi.org/10.26623/jreb.v11i2.1079" @default.
• W2904014554 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2904014554 type Work @default.
• W2904014554 sameAs 2904014554 @default.
• W2904014554 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2904014554 countsByYear W29040145542021 @default.
• W2904014554 countsByYear W29040145542023 @default.
• W2904014554 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2904014554 hasAuthorship W2904014554A5059668684 @default.
• W2904014554 hasAuthorship W2904014554A5075497832 @default.
• W2904014554 hasAuthorship W2904014554A5077467537 @default.
• W2904014554 hasAuthorship W2904014554A5091388568 @default.
• W2904014554 hasBestOaLocation W29040145541 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConcept C106159729 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConcept C139938925 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConcept C2780821815 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConcept C44723521 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConceptScore W2904014554C106159729 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConceptScore W2904014554C139938925 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConceptScore W2904014554C142362112 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConceptScore W2904014554C15708023 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConceptScore W2904014554C162324750 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConceptScore W2904014554C2780821815 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConceptScore W2904014554C33923547 @default.
• W2904014554 hasConceptScore W2904014554C44723521 @default.
• W2904014554 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2904014554 hasLocation W29040145541 @default.
• W2904014554 hasOpenAccess W2904014554 @default.
• W2904014554 hasPrimaryLocation W29040145541 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W1988167694 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W2592695237 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W2742989425 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W2946535532 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W3129607041 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W3208559536 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W4288048661 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W1926659914 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W2341619005 @default.
• W2904014554 hasRelatedWork W3009501688 @default.
• W2904014554 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W2904014554 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2904014554 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2904014554 magId "2904014554" @default.
• W2904014554 workType "article" @default.