FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2904149209> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2904149209 endingPage "615" @default.
• W2904149209 startingPage "607" @default.
• W2904149209 abstract "ABSTRACT The optimal approach to osteoporosis screening and treatment in postmenopausal women is unclear. We compared (i) the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and Osteoporosis Canada osteoporosis screening strategies; and (ii) the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) and Canadian treatment strategies. We used data from the prospective Women's Health Initiative Observational Study and Clinical Trials of women aged 50 to 79 years at baseline ( n = 117,707 followed for self‐reported fractures; n = 8134 in bone mineral density [BMD] subset). We determined the yield of the screening and treatment strategies in identifying women who experienced major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) during a 10‐year follow‐up. Among women aged 50 to 64 years, 23.1% of women were identified for BMD testing under the USPSTF strategy and 52.3% under the Canadian strategy. For women ≥65 years, 100% were identified for testing under the USPSTF and Canadian strategies, 35% to 74% were identified for treatment under NOF, and 16% to 37% were identified for treatment under CAROC (range among 5‐year age subgroups). Among women who experienced MOF during follow‐up, the USPSTF strategy identified 6.7% of women 50 to 54 years‐old and 49.5% of women 60 to 64 years‐old for BMD testing (versus 54.4% and 60.6% for the Canadian strategy, respectively). However, the specificity of the USPSTF strategy was higher than that of the Canadian strategy among women 50 to 64 years‐old. Among women who experienced MOF during follow‐up, sensitivity for identifying women as treatment candidates was lowest for both strategies in women aged 50 to 64 (NOF 10% to 38%; CAROC 1% to 15%) and maximal in 75‐year‐old to 79‐year‐old women (NOF 82.8%; 51.6% CAROC); specificity declined with advancing age and was lower with the NOF compared to the CAROC strategy. Among women aged 50 to 64 years, the screening and treatment strategies examined had low sensitivity for identifying those who subsequently experience MOF; sensitivity was higher among women ≥65 years than among younger women. New screening and treatment algorithms are needed. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research." @default.
• W2904149209 created "2018-12-22" @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5002161772 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5009986689 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5010379448 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5016111941 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5036194463 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5041374470 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5048208043 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5054575797 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5062383019 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5075674266 @default.
• W2904149209 creator A5076423165 @default.
• W2904149209 date "2019-01-15" @default.
• W2904149209 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2904149209 title "A Comparison of US and Canadian Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment Strategies in Postmenopausal Women" @default.
• W2904149209 cites W1544701658 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W1606867770 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2026965697 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2063310034 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2110768118 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2114740353 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2128977360 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2139796029 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2290627980 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2339718214 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2577609563 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2779360780 @default.
• W2904149209 cites W2810327208 @default.
• W2904149209 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3636" @default.
• W2904149209 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7354844" @default.
• W2904149209 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30536628" @default.
• W2904149209 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2904149209 type Work @default.
• W2904149209 sameAs 2904149209 @default.
• W2904149209 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2904149209 countsByYear W29041492092019 @default.
• W2904149209 countsByYear W29041492092020 @default.
• W2904149209 countsByYear W29041492092021 @default.
• W2904149209 countsByYear W29041492092022 @default.
• W2904149209 countsByYear W29041492092023 @default.
• W2904149209 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5002161772 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5009986689 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5010379448 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5016111941 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5036194463 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5041374470 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5048208043 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5054575797 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5062383019 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5075674266 @default.
• W2904149209 hasAuthorship W2904149209A5076423165 @default.
• W2904149209 hasBestOaLocation W29041492091 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C2776541429 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C2776886416 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C2780733421 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C2985871740 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C3018603563 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C126322002 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C17744445 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C1862650 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C187212893 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C23131810 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C2776541429 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C2776886416 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C2780733421 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C2985871740 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C3018603563 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C3116431 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C512399662 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C71924100 @default.
• W2904149209 hasConceptScore W2904149209C74909509 @default.
• W2904149209 hasFunder F4320306085 @default.
• W2904149209 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2904149209 hasLocation W29041492091 @default.
• W2904149209 hasLocation W29041492092 @default.
• W2904149209 hasLocation W29041492093 @default.
• W2904149209 hasLocation W29041492094 @default.
• W2904149209 hasOpenAccess W2904149209 @default.
• W2904149209 hasPrimaryLocation W29041492091 @default.
• W2904149209 hasRelatedWork W1975317520 @default.
• W2904149209 hasRelatedWork W2092526853 @default.
• W2904149209 hasRelatedWork W2316071504 @default.
• W2904149209 hasRelatedWork W2358010641 @default.
• W2904149209 hasRelatedWork W2359070681 @default.
• W2904149209 hasRelatedWork W2991782731 @default.
• W2904149209 hasRelatedWork W4255537711 @default.
• W2904149209 hasRelatedWork W4285251055 @default.

• next