FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2904214144> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2904214144 endingPage "1923" @default.
• W2904214144 startingPage "1899" @default.
• W2904214144 abstract "Purpose University students are the future driving forces in and leaders of the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry advancement. Although BIM pedagogical studies have been performed in different institutions, there has not been sufficient research providing a global perspective of BIM education and students’ perceptions toward BIM practice and application following their learning progress. The purpose of this paper is to adopt student samples from Swinburne University of Technology (SUT, Australia), Wenzhou University (WZU, China) and University of Brighton (UK) as three case studies to investigate the BIM practice and application-related perceptions and motivations. Design/methodology/approach Based on the thorough understanding of the BIM pedagogical delivery including teaching contents and assessment methods among the three institutions, a questionnaire survey approach was adopted to collect AEC students’ perceptions of BIM. Within each selected case, statistical analysis was conducted to investigate both the overall sample and subgroup differences regarding students’ opinions on BIM’s functions (e.g. as a 3D visualization tool) and BIM usefulness in various industry professions, their motivation in BIM-related jobs and their perceptions of challenges encountered in BIM practice and application. Multiple factors influencing BIM learners’ perceptions were discussed, such as pedagogical assessment approach, and individual factors (e.g. disciplines). Findings The results showed that students were able to discern the latest industry practices and critical thinking in BIM movements. For example, SUT students perceived more challenges from the government legislation or incentive policies, which was consistent with Australia’s BIM policy movement. WZU students tended to have less positive views on BIM usefulness. The results also indicated fewer differences regarding perceived challenges among students from these three institutions. Originality/value This study contributed to the body of knowledge in managerial BIM by focusing on learners’ perceptions from the perspective of students’ understanding, motivation and individual views of BIM, which were insightful to both BIM educators and employers. By initiating the framework of BIM learning process and its influence factors, the current study serves as a point of reference to continue the future work in strengthening the connection between institutional BIM education and industry practical needs worldwide." @default.
• W2904214144 created "2018-12-22" @default.
• W2904214144 creator A5008784781 @default.
• W2904214144 creator A5017928757 @default.
• W2904214144 creator A5022350737 @default.
• W2904214144 creator A5033129822 @default.
• W2904214144 creator A5080911760 @default.
• W2904214144 date "2019-06-04" @default.
• W2904214144 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2904214144 title "Comparisons of students’ perceptions on BIM practice among Australia, China and UK" @default.
• W2904214144 cites W1566778192 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W1575910362 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W1646074461 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W1975254659 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W1986924262 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W1992987985 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2007202336 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2044554697 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2047115781 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2050453477 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2051750668 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2054305525 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2054639420 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2060670062 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2061141931 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2066569056 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2071721060 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2075808966 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2076774992 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2087050067 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2132128466 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2140062591 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2140739497 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2159306398 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2161841154 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2176249530 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2216829977 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2415201140 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2553874948 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2596272678 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2606468963 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2616136406 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2625233517 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2742493246 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2762128394 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2766875642 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2781883310 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2786067832 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2891805276 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2898946316 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W2920466019 @default.
• W2904214144 cites W4241138704 @default.
• W2904214144 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2018-0275" @default.
• W2904214144 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2904214144 type Work @default.
• W2904214144 sameAs 2904214144 @default.
• W2904214144 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2904214144 countsByYear W29042141442019 @default.
• W2904214144 countsByYear W29042141442020 @default.
• W2904214144 countsByYear W29042141442021 @default.
• W2904214144 countsByYear W29042141442022 @default.
• W2904214144 countsByYear W29042141442023 @default.
• W2904214144 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2904214144 hasAuthorship W2904214144A5008784781 @default.
• W2904214144 hasAuthorship W2904214144A5017928757 @default.
• W2904214144 hasAuthorship W2904214144A5022350737 @default.
• W2904214144 hasAuthorship W2904214144A5033129822 @default.
• W2904214144 hasAuthorship W2904214144A5080911760 @default.
• W2904214144 hasBestOaLocation W29042141442 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C29122968 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C127413603 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C138885662 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C15744967 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C162324750 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C169760540 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C175444787 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C17744445 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C185592680 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C191935318 @default.
• W2904214144 hasConceptScore W2904214144C19417346 @default.

• next