FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2904292081> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2904292081 endingPage "e11938" @default.
• W2904292081 startingPage "e11938" @default.
• W2904292081 abstract "Previous research indicates that patients and their families have many questions about colonoscopy that are not fully answered by existing resources. We developed revised forms on colonoscopy bowel preparation and on the procedure itself.As the goal of the revised materials is to have improved information relative to currently available information, we were interested in how revised information compared with what is currently available in terms of information quality and patient preference.Participants were asked to review one at a time the Revised and Current versions of Colonoscopy bowel preparation instructions (study 1) and About Colonoscopy (study 2). The order of administration of the Revised and Current versions was randomly counterbalanced to assess order effects. Respondents rated each form along the following dimensions: amount, clarity, trustworthiness, readability and understandability, how new or familiar the information was, and reassurance. Participants were asked which form they preferred and 4 questions about why they preferred it. Open-ended questions asked participants to describe likes and dislikes of the forms and suggestions for improvement.The study 1 and study 2 samples were similar. Overall, in study 1, 62.4% preferred the Revised form, 28.1% preferred the Current form, and 6.7% were not sure. Overall, in study 2, 50.5% preferred the Revised form, 31.1% preferred the Current form, and 18.4% were not sure. Almost 75% of those in study 1 who received the Revised form first, preferred it, compared with less than half of those who received it first in study 2. In study 1, 75% of those without previous colonoscopy experience preferred the Revised form, compared with more than half of those who had previously undergone a colonoscopy. The study 1 logistic regression analysis demonstrated that participants were more likely to prefer the Revised form if they had viewed it first and had no previous experience with colonoscopy. In study 2, none of the variables assessed were associated with a preference for the Revised form. In comparing the 2 forms head-to-head, participants who preferred the Revised form in study 1 rated it as clearer compared with those who preferred the Current form. Finally, many participants who preferred the Revised form indicated in the open-ended questions that they liked it because it had more information than the Current form and that it had good visual information.This study is one of the first to evaluate 2 different patient education resources in a head-to-head comparison using the same participants in a within-subjects design. This approach was useful in comparing revised educational information with current resources. Moving forward, this knowledge translation approach of a head-to-head comparison of 2 different information sources could be taken to develop and refine information sources on other health issues." @default.
• W2904292081 created "2018-12-22" @default.
• W2904292081 creator A5000118921 @default.
• W2904292081 creator A5004441225 @default.
• W2904292081 creator A5034671758 @default.
• W2904292081 creator A5050911713 @default.
• W2904292081 creator A5064298425 @default.
• W2904292081 creator A5075745857 @default.
• W2904292081 creator A5082158126 @default.
• W2904292081 date "2019-02-20" @default.
• W2904292081 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2904292081 title "Evaluating Information Quality of Revised Patient Education Information on Colonoscopy: It Is New But Is It Improved?" @default.
• W2904292081 cites W1737932682 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W1924618820 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W1964055810 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W1971757281 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W1995152821 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2005040873 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2008874309 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2012671139 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2022892601 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2042396062 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2043812600 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2063007022 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2070204206 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2070589960 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2081257607 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2085475584 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2091822281 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2104312285 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2105410691 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2129340853 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2138134327 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2149863552 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2260281562 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2363606877 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2530704880 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2592038954 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2626903902 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2782696645 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W2899119880 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W3100558340 @default.
• W2904292081 cites W4249721846 @default.
• W2904292081 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/11938" @default.
• W2904292081 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6401670" @default.
• W2904292081 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30785412" @default.
• W2904292081 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2904292081 type Work @default.
• W2904292081 sameAs 2904292081 @default.
• W2904292081 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2904292081 countsByYear W29042920812019 @default.
• W2904292081 countsByYear W29042920812020 @default.
• W2904292081 countsByYear W29042920812022 @default.
• W2904292081 countsByYear W29042920812023 @default.
• W2904292081 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2904292081 hasAuthorship W2904292081A5000118921 @default.
• W2904292081 hasAuthorship W2904292081A5004441225 @default.
• W2904292081 hasAuthorship W2904292081A5034671758 @default.
• W2904292081 hasAuthorship W2904292081A5050911713 @default.
• W2904292081 hasAuthorship W2904292081A5064298425 @default.
• W2904292081 hasAuthorship W2904292081A5075745857 @default.
• W2904292081 hasAuthorship W2904292081A5082158126 @default.
• W2904292081 hasBestOaLocation W29042920811 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C180198813 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C2777146004 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C2778143727 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C3019222653 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C45983554 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C105795698 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C111472728 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C119599485 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C121608353 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C126322002 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C127413603 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C138885662 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C15744967 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C180198813 @default.
• W2904292081 hasConceptScore W2904292081C185592680 @default.

• next