Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2904646504> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2904646504 endingPage "523" @default.
- W2904646504 startingPage "517" @default.
- W2904646504 abstract "ABSTRACT Objective Cervical cerclage, when performed in twin gestation, has been reported to be associated with poor outcome. However, the role of first‐trimester history‐indicated cerclage among women with a twin pregnancy and a history of preterm birth has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess pregnancy outcomes among women with a twin pregnancy who underwent first‐trimester history‐indicated cervical cerclage compared with outcomes in those managed expectantly. Methods This was a retrospective matched case–control study. The study group comprised all women with a twin pregnancy who had undergone first‐trimester history‐indicated cerclage during the period 2006 to 2017 at Hadassah‐Hebrew University Medical Center. A control group of women with a twin pregnancy who were managed expectantly was established by matching age, history of spontaneous preterm birth (20–36 weeks' gestation) and year of delivery. Pregnancy and delivery characteristics and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results Data from 82 women with a twin gestation were analyzed, of whom 41 underwent first‐trimester history‐indicated cerclage and 41 were matched controls who were managed expectantly. Gestational age at delivery was higher in the cerclage group than in those managed expectantly (median 35 vs 30 weeks; P < 0.0001). Rates of spontaneous preterm birth before 24 weeks (2.4% vs 19.5%; odds ratio (OR), 0.10 (95% CI, 0.01–0.87); P = 0.03), before 28 weeks (12.2% vs 34.1%; OR, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.09–0.84); P = 0.03), before 32 weeks (22.0% vs 56.1%; OR, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.08–0.58); P = 0.003) and before 34 weeks (34.1% vs 82.9%; OR, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.04–0.30); P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the cerclage group than in the control group. Median birth weight was higher in the cerclage group (2072 g vs 1750 g; P = 0.003), with lower rates of low birth weight (< 2500 g) (65.0% vs 89.4%; P = 0.001) and very low birth weight (< 1500 g) (21.3% vs 37.9%; P = 0.03) than in the group managed expectantly. Rates were also lower in the cerclage group for stillbirth, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, neonatal mortality and composite adverse neonatal outcome. Conclusions History‐indicated cerclage performed in the first trimester, as compared with expectant management, in women with a twin pregnancy had an overall positive effect on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. These findings suggest the need for adequate randomized trials on cerclage placement in this subset of women. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd." @default.
- W2904646504 created "2018-12-22" @default.
- W2904646504 creator A5001878517 @default.
- W2904646504 creator A5014412259 @default.
- W2904646504 creator A5031802079 @default.
- W2904646504 creator A5043249566 @default.
- W2904646504 creator A5045233122 @default.
- W2904646504 creator A5067809284 @default.
- W2904646504 creator A5075681037 @default.
- W2904646504 date "2019-08-29" @default.
- W2904646504 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
- W2904646504 title "History‐indicated cervical cerclage in management of twin pregnancy" @default.
- W2904646504 cites W1833375220 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W1967559107 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W1975755498 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W1982253990 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W1986570332 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2005777362 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2008566335 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2019549525 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2019580844 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2028704757 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2033618923 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2039732224 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2041715108 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2044601446 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2046224781 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2065664872 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2067927950 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2092015192 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2115344073 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2117170338 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2152876433 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2163279979 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2318355369 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W2343136097 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W3148465273 @default.
- W2904646504 cites W4235911572 @default.
- W2904646504 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20192" @default.
- W2904646504 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30549119" @default.
- W2904646504 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2904646504 type Work @default.
- W2904646504 sameAs 2904646504 @default.
- W2904646504 citedByCount "19" @default.
- W2904646504 countsByYear W29046465042020 @default.
- W2904646504 countsByYear W29046465042021 @default.
- W2904646504 countsByYear W29046465042022 @default.
- W2904646504 countsByYear W29046465042023 @default.
- W2904646504 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2904646504 hasAuthorship W2904646504A5001878517 @default.
- W2904646504 hasAuthorship W2904646504A5014412259 @default.
- W2904646504 hasAuthorship W2904646504A5031802079 @default.
- W2904646504 hasAuthorship W2904646504A5043249566 @default.
- W2904646504 hasAuthorship W2904646504A5045233122 @default.
- W2904646504 hasAuthorship W2904646504A5067809284 @default.
- W2904646504 hasAuthorship W2904646504A5075681037 @default.
- W2904646504 hasBestOaLocation W29046465041 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C2778376644 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C2779245376 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C2779508502 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C2909855057 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C2910530332 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C46973012 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C126322002 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C131872663 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C156957248 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C2778376644 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C2779234561 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C2779245376 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C2779508502 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C2909855057 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C2910530332 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C29456083 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C46973012 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C54355233 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C71924100 @default.
- W2904646504 hasConceptScore W2904646504C86803240 @default.
- W2904646504 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2904646504 hasLocation W29046465041 @default.
- W2904646504 hasLocation W29046465042 @default.
- W2904646504 hasOpenAccess W2904646504 @default.
- W2904646504 hasPrimaryLocation W29046465041 @default.
- W2904646504 hasRelatedWork W2028704757 @default.
- W2904646504 hasRelatedWork W2129124318 @default.
- W2904646504 hasRelatedWork W2132973893 @default.
- W2904646504 hasRelatedWork W2522639443 @default.
- W2904646504 hasRelatedWork W2752916165 @default.
- W2904646504 hasRelatedWork W3004395288 @default.
- W2904646504 hasRelatedWork W3163987424 @default.
- W2904646504 hasRelatedWork W4296322652 @default.