FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2904754806> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2904754806 endingPage "2231" @default.
• W2904754806 startingPage "2222" @default.
• W2904754806 abstract "Is the indication for fertility preservation (FP) related to success in IVF cycles after elective-FP (EFP) for age-related fertility decline and FP before cancer treatment (Onco-FP)?Although success rates were lower in cancer patients, there was no statistically significant association between malignant disease and reproductive outcome after correction for age and controlled-ovarian stimulation (COS) regime.FP is increasingly applied in assisted reproduction, but little is known about the outcome of IVF cycles with vitrified oocytes in FP patients.Retrospective, observational multicenter study of vitrification cycles for FP and of the warming cycles of women who returned to attempt pregnancy from January 2007 to May 2018.In all, 6362 women (EFP = 5289 patients; 7044 cycles + Onco-FP = 1073 patients; 1172 cycles) had their oocytes vitrified for FP. A logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the impact of indication for FP corrected for age at vitrification. The protocol used for COS was also included as a possible confounder. The main outcome measures were oocyte survival and live birth. A detailed description of the baseline and clinical data is provided, with comparisons between EFP and Onco-FP. The cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per utilized oocyte according to age at vitrification was analyzed in those patients returning to use their oocytes.Age at vitrification was significantly older in EFP patients (37.2 ± 4.9 vs. 32.3 ± 3.5 year; P < 0.0001). Fewer oocytes were retrieved and vitrified per cycle in EFP (9.6 ± 8.4 vs. 11.4 ± 3.5 and 7.3 ± 11.3 vs. 8.7 ± 2.1, respectively; P < 0.05), but numbers became comparable when analyzed per patient (12.8 ± 7.4 vs. 12.5 ± 3.2 and 9.8 ± 6.4 vs. 9.5 ± 2.6). Storage time was shorter in EFP (2.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9 years; P < 0.0001). In all, 641 (12.1%) EFP and 80 (7.4%) Onco-FP patients returned to attempt pregnancy (P < 0.05). Overall oocyte survival was comparable (83.9% vs. 81.8%; NS), but lower for onco-FP patients among younger (≤35 year) subjects (81.2% vs. 91.4%; P > 0.05). Fewer EFP cycles finished in embryo transfer (50.2% vs. 72.5%) (P < 0.05). The implantation rate was 42.6% and 32.5% in EFP versus Onco-FP (P < 0.05). Ongoing pregnancy (57.7% vs. 35.7%) and live birth rates (68.8% vs. 41.1%) were higher in EFP patients aged ≤35 than the Onco-FP matching age patients (P < 0.05). The reason for FP per se had no effect on oocyte survival (OR = 1.484 [95%CI = 0.876-2.252]; P = 0.202) or the CLBR (OR = 1.275 [95%CI = 0.711-2.284]; P = 0.414). Conversely, age (<36 vs. ≥36 y) impacted oocyte survival (adj.OR = 1.922 [95%CI = 1.274-2.900]; P = 0.025) and the CLBR (adj.OR= 3.106 [95%CI = 2.039-4.733]; P < 0.0001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher cumulative probability of live birth in patients <36 versus >36 in EFP (P < 0.0001), with improved outcomes when more oocytes were available for IVF.Statistical power to compare IVF outcomes is limited by the few women who came to use their oocytes in the Onco-FP group. The patients' ages and the COS protocols used were significantly different between the EFP and ONCO-PP groups.Although the implantation rate was significantly lower in the Onco-FP patients the impact of cancer disease per se was not proven'. EFP patients should be counseled according to their age and number of available oocytes.No external funding was used for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest.N/A." @default.
• W2904754806 created "2018-12-22" @default.
• W2904754806 creator A5004354668 @default.
• W2904754806 creator A5015002150 @default.
• W2904754806 creator A5051876969 @default.
• W2904754806 creator A5073154677 @default.
• W2904754806 creator A5074284134 @default.
• W2904754806 date "2018-10-31" @default.
• W2904754806 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2904754806 title "Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes" @default.
• W2904754806 cites W1467931446 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W1974341922 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W1985666741 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W1997242064 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2012804460 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2020469663 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2021291529 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2022808195 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2025301286 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2031061659 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2037145686 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2046018718 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2049331103 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2054886999 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2065068549 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2070674492 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2079631120 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2080221226 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2091657652 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2092961476 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2114175914 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2151249060 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2153957603 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2160649321 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2170237493 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2179180919 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2190343687 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2236834725 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2302668502 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2325871901 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2330693315 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2338935278 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2486269942 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2520011610 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2524668850 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2568694308 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2587452107 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2609616136 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2737252351 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2746614475 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2763439289 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2769974196 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2802641649 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2807568487 @default.
• W2904754806 cites W2884641698 @default.
• W2904754806 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey321" @default.
• W2904754806 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30383235" @default.
• W2904754806 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2904754806 type Work @default.
• W2904754806 sameAs 2904754806 @default.
• W2904754806 citedByCount "189" @default.
• W2904754806 countsByYear W29047548062019 @default.
• W2904754806 countsByYear W29047548062020 @default.
• W2904754806 countsByYear W29047548062021 @default.
• W2904754806 countsByYear W29047548062022 @default.
• W2904754806 countsByYear W29047548062023 @default.
• W2904754806 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2904754806 hasAuthorship W2904754806A5004354668 @default.
• W2904754806 hasAuthorship W2904754806A5015002150 @default.
• W2904754806 hasAuthorship W2904754806A5051876969 @default.
• W2904754806 hasAuthorship W2904754806A5073154677 @default.
• W2904754806 hasAuthorship W2904754806A5074284134 @default.
• W2904754806 hasBestOaLocation W29047548061 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C2777904497 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C2778279030 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C2778459216 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C518429986 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C126322002 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C131872663 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C2777688143 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C2777904497 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C2778279030 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C2778459216 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C2779234561 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C2908647359 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C29456083 @default.
• W2904754806 hasConceptScore W2904754806C518429986 @default.

• next