FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2904893297> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2904893297 endingPage "3443" @default.
• W2904893297 startingPage "3436" @default.
• W2904893297 abstract "Cost-effectiveness of robotic-assisted surgery is still debatable. Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair has no clear clinical benefit over laparoscopic repair. We performed a comprehensive cost-analysis comparison between the two approaches for evaluation of their cost-effectiveness in a large healthcare system in the Western United States. Health records in 32 hospitals were queried for procedural costs of inguinal hernia repairs between January 2015 and March 2017. Elective robotic-assisted or laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs were included. Cost calculations were done using a utilization-based costing model. Total cost included: fixed cost, which comprises medical device and personnel costs, and variable cost, which comprises disposables and reusable instruments costs. Other outcome measures were length of stay (LOS), conversion to open, and operative times. Statistics were done using t test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 2405 cases, 734 robotic-assisted (633 Primary: 101 recurrent) and 1671 laparoscopic (1471 Primary: 200 recurrent), were included. The average total cost was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the robotic-assisted group ($5517) compared to the laparoscopic group ($3269). However, the average laparoscopic variable cost ($1105) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the robotic-assisted cost ($933). Whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups for LOS and conversion to open, average operative times were significantly higher in the robotic-assisted group (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis for primary and recurrent inguinal hernias matched the overall results. Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair has a significantly higher cost and significantly longer operative times, compared to the laparoscopic approach. The study has shown that only fixed cost contributes to the cost difference between the two approaches. Medical device cost plus the longer operative times are the main factors driving the cost difference. Laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair is more cost-effective compared to a robotic-assisted approach." @default.
• W2904893297 created "2018-12-22" @default.
• W2904893297 creator A5018717866 @default.
• W2904893297 creator A5041526240 @default.
• W2904893297 creator A5045395552 @default.
• W2904893297 creator A5064197212 @default.
• W2904893297 creator A5076989398 @default.
• W2904893297 date "2018-12-07" @default.
• W2904893297 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2904893297 title "Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis" @default.
• W2904893297 cites W1509038332 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W1991751167 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W1994673307 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2003380936 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2017832300 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2024265255 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2031389439 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2034490915 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2056305540 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2056586188 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2059237299 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2059622452 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2070596180 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2070774403 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2077072611 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2112442878 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2143004430 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2171468379 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2207000661 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2343073203 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2346449831 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2416998795 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2465474325 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2553597112 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2594913960 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2752517864 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2761205515 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2766813903 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2776596952 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2789365628 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2789897651 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W2794138632 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W4244346572 @default.
• W2904893297 cites W4256712811 @default.
• W2904893297 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9" @default.
• W2904893297 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30535936" @default.
• W2904893297 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2904893297 type Work @default.
• W2904893297 sameAs 2904893297 @default.
• W2904893297 citedByCount "52" @default.
• W2904893297 countsByYear W29048932972019 @default.
• W2904893297 countsByYear W29048932972020 @default.
• W2904893297 countsByYear W29048932972021 @default.
• W2904893297 countsByYear W29048932972022 @default.
• W2904893297 countsByYear W29048932972023 @default.
• W2904893297 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2904893297 hasAuthorship W2904893297A5018717866 @default.
• W2904893297 hasAuthorship W2904893297A5041526240 @default.
• W2904893297 hasAuthorship W2904893297A5045395552 @default.
• W2904893297 hasAuthorship W2904893297A5064197212 @default.
• W2904893297 hasAuthorship W2904893297A5076989398 @default.
• W2904893297 hasBestOaLocation W29048932971 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C103203806 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C2776724281 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C2781132756 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C2983335822 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C103203806 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C112930515 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C127413603 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C141071460 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C2776724281 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C2779096551 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C2780047204 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C2780120127 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C2781132756 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C2983335822 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C3019080777 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C42475967 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C61434518 @default.
• W2904893297 hasConceptScore W2904893297C71924100 @default.
• W2904893297 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2904893297 hasLocation W29048932971 @default.
• W2904893297 hasLocation W29048932972 @default.
• W2904893297 hasOpenAccess W2904893297 @default.
• W2904893297 hasPrimaryLocation W29048932971 @default.
• W2904893297 hasRelatedWork W174632727 @default.
• W2904893297 hasRelatedWork W2008017283 @default.
• W2904893297 hasRelatedWork W2018144414 @default.

• next