FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2906376005> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2906376005 endingPage "76" @default.
• W2906376005 startingPage "69" @default.
• W2906376005 abstract "Abstract Background: The role of periplaque fat (PPF), as a fragment of the total epicardial adipose tissue, measured in the vicinity of a target coronary lesion, more specifically within the close proximity of a vulnerable plaque, has yet to be evaluated. The study aimed to evaluate the interrelation between PPF and coronary plaque vulnerability in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). Secondary objective: evaluation of the relationship between the total pericardial fat and markers for plaque vulnerability. Materials and methods: We prospectively enrolled 77 patients with stable CAD, who underwent 128-multislice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), and who presented minimum one lesion with >50% stenosis. CTCA analysis included measurements of: total pericardial fat and PPF volumes, coronary plaque characteristics, markers for plaque vulnerability – positive remodeling (PR), low attenuation plaque (LAP), spotty calcifications (SC,) napkin ring sign (NRS). Study subjects were divided into two categories: Group 1 – 1 marker of plaque vulnerability (n = 36, 46.75%) and Group 2 – ≥1 marker of vulnerability (n = 41, 53.25%). Results: The mean age of the population was 61.77 ± 11.28 years, and 41 (53.24%) were males. The analysis of plaque characteristics showed that Group 2 presented significantly longer plaques (16.26 ± 4.605 mm vs. 19.09 ± 5.227 mm, p = 0.02), remodeling index (0.96 ± 0.20 vs. 1.18 ± 0.33, p = 0.0009), and vessel volume (p = 0.027), and more voluminous plaques (147.5 ± 71.74 mm3 vs. 207.7 ± 108.9 mm3, p = 0.006) compared to Group 1. Group 2 presented larger volumes of PPF (512.2 ± 289.9 mm3 vs. 710.9 ± 361.9 mm3, p = 0.01) and of thoracic fat volume (1,616 ± 614.8 mm3 vs. 2,000 ± 850.9 mm3, p = 0.02), compared to Group 1, but no differences were found regarding the total pericardial fat (p = 0.49). Patients with 3 or 4 vulnerability markers (VM) presented significantly larges PPF volumes compared to those with 1 or 2 VM, respectively (p = 0.008). There was a significant positive correlation between PPF volume and the non-calcified (r = 0.474, 95% CI 0.2797–0.6311, p <0.0001), lipid-rich (r = 0.316, 95% CI 0.099–0.504, p = 0.005), and fibro-fatty (r = 0.452, 95% CI 0.2541–0.6142, p <0.0001) volumes. The total pericardial fat was significantly correlated only with the volume of lipid-rich plaques (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Periplaque fat volume was associated with a higher degree of coronary plaque vulnerability. PPF was correlated with lipid-rich, fibro-fatty, and non-calcified plaque-related volumes, as markers for enhanced plaque vulnerability. PPF volume, assessed with native cardiac computed tomography, could become a novel marker for coronary plaque vulnerability." @default.
• W2906376005 created "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2906376005 creator A5019798914 @default.
• W2906376005 creator A5048136690 @default.
• W2906376005 creator A5052239732 @default.
• W2906376005 creator A5055157744 @default.
• W2906376005 creator A5069370946 @default.
• W2906376005 creator A5081493363 @default.
• W2906376005 date "2018-06-01" @default.
• W2906376005 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2906376005 title "The Effect of Periplaque Fat on Coronary Plaque Vulnerability in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease – a 128-multislice CT-based Study" @default.
• W2906376005 cites W113768872 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W135321714 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W1980855871 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W1990865529 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W1997237788 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W1999267394 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2013275510 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2018637416 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2024105966 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2024293388 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2025089841 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2037717990 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2044701589 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2053642000 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2056501772 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2058267199 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2086284587 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2090372575 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2093627517 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2110909360 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2118606707 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2121701258 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2122201881 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2139959600 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2177753066 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2219688070 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2291019285 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2298994001 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2302269942 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2335175406 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2398890338 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2545736093 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2568811465 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2571428214 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2572078765 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2583815653 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2589516392 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2594961640 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2621395390 @default.
• W2906376005 cites W2747332931 @default.
• W2906376005 doi "https://doi.org/10.2478/jim-2018-0019" @default.
• W2906376005 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2906376005 type Work @default.
• W2906376005 sameAs 2906376005 @default.
• W2906376005 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2906376005 countsByYear W29063760052018 @default.
• W2906376005 countsByYear W29063760052019 @default.
• W2906376005 countsByYear W29063760052023 @default.
• W2906376005 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2906376005 hasAuthorship W2906376005A5019798914 @default.
• W2906376005 hasAuthorship W2906376005A5048136690 @default.
• W2906376005 hasAuthorship W2906376005A5052239732 @default.
• W2906376005 hasAuthorship W2906376005A5055157744 @default.
• W2906376005 hasAuthorship W2906376005A5069370946 @default.
• W2906376005 hasAuthorship W2906376005A5081493363 @default.
• W2906376005 hasBestOaLocation W29063760051 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C171089720 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2778710248 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2779179121 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2779619515 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2908987861 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2991716557 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C2992140384 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C126322002 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C126838900 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C142724271 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C164705383 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C171089720 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C2778213512 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C2778710248 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C2779179121 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C2779619515 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C2780007028 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C2781156865 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C2908647359 @default.
• W2906376005 hasConceptScore W2906376005C2908987861 @default.

• next