FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2908028367> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2908028367 endingPage "1567" @default.
• W2908028367 startingPage "1555" @default.
• W2908028367 abstract "Abstract Aims and objectives To describe and compare the pain process of the patients’ with cardiac surgery through nurses’ and physicians’ documentations in the electronic patient records. Background Postoperative pain assessment and management should be documented regularly, to ensure optimal pain care process for patients. Despite availability of evidence‐based guidelines, pain assessment and documentation remain inadequate. Design A retrospective patients’ record review. Methods The original data consisted of the electronic patient records of 26,922 patients with a diagnosed heart disease. A total of 1,818 care episodes of patients with cardiac surgery were selected from the data. We used random sampling to obtain 280 care episodes for annotation. These 280 care episodes contained 2,156 physician reports and 1,327 days of nursing notes. We developed an annotation manual and schema, and then, we manually conducted semantic annotation on care episodes, using the Brat annotation tool. We analysed the annotation units using thematic analysis. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guideline was followed in reporting where appropriate in this study design. Results We discovered expressions of six different aspects of pain process: (a) cause, (b) situation, (c) features, (d) consequences, (e) actions and (f) outcomes. We determined that five of the aspects existed chronologically. However, the features of pain were simultaneously existing. They indicated the location, quality, intensity, and temporality of the pain and they were present in every phase of the patient’s pain process. Cardiac and postoperative pain documentations differed from each other in used expressions and in the quantity and quality of descriptions. Conclusion We could construct a comprehensive pain process of the patients with cardiac surgery from several electronic patient records. The challenge remains how to support systematic documentation in each patient. Relevance to clinical practice The study provides knowledge and guidance of pain process aspects that can be used to achieve an effective pain assessment and more comprehensive documentation." @default.
• W2908028367 created "2019-01-11" @default.
• W2908028367 creator A5023202575 @default.
• W2908028367 creator A5024930014 @default.
• W2908028367 creator A5026962850 @default.
• W2908028367 creator A5038451013 @default.
• W2908028367 creator A5055125201 @default.
• W2908028367 creator A5065512416 @default.
• W2908028367 creator A5074335704 @default.
• W2908028367 creator A5077864708 @default.
• W2908028367 date "2019-01-15" @default.
• W2908028367 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2908028367 title "Pain process of patients with cardiac surgery—Semantic annotation of electronic patient record data" @default.
• W2908028367 cites W1501618605 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W1599253845 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W1963892883 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W1967785702 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W1972201285 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W1991630503 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2007717632 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2019413375 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2033524050 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2040702949 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2057693385 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2069060923 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2070208538 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2074896172 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2080374667 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2087225028 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2108673167 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2116693894 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2118473575 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2137556939 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2138664283 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2153439073 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2157847094 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2163020270 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2233857945 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2325924302 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2507876136 @default.
• W2908028367 cites W2605344818 @default.
• W2908028367 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14752" @default.
• W2908028367 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30589139" @default.
• W2908028367 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2908028367 type Work @default.
• W2908028367 sameAs 2908028367 @default.
• W2908028367 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2908028367 countsByYear W29080283672020 @default.
• W2908028367 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2908028367 hasAuthorship W2908028367A5023202575 @default.
• W2908028367 hasAuthorship W2908028367A5024930014 @default.
• W2908028367 hasAuthorship W2908028367A5026962850 @default.
• W2908028367 hasAuthorship W2908028367A5038451013 @default.
• W2908028367 hasAuthorship W2908028367A5055125201 @default.
• W2908028367 hasAuthorship W2908028367A5065512416 @default.
• W2908028367 hasAuthorship W2908028367A5074335704 @default.
• W2908028367 hasAuthorship W2908028367A5077864708 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C2776321320 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C2778282284 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C2983098980 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C52146309 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C154945302 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C17744445 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C1862650 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C199360897 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C199539241 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C23123220 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C2776321320 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C2778282284 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C2779473830 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C2983098980 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C41008148 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C52146309 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C56666940 @default.
• W2908028367 hasConceptScore W2908028367C71924100 @default.
• W2908028367 hasFunder F4320321726 @default.
• W2908028367 hasFunder F4320321855 @default.
• W2908028367 hasIssue "9-10" @default.
• W2908028367 hasLocation W29080283671 @default.
• W2908028367 hasLocation W29080283672 @default.
• W2908028367 hasOpenAccess W2908028367 @default.
• W2908028367 hasPrimaryLocation W29080283671 @default.
• W2908028367 hasRelatedWork W1627248672 @default.
• W2908028367 hasRelatedWork W2016231886 @default.
• W2908028367 hasRelatedWork W2074734816 @default.
• W2908028367 hasRelatedWork W2233857945 @default.
• W2908028367 hasRelatedWork W2937657581 @default.

• next