FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2908131418> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2908131418 endingPage "241e" @default.
• W2908131418 startingPage "240e" @default.
• W2908131418 abstract "Sir: We thank Dr. Sforza for his interest in our article “Motiva Ergonomix Round SilkSurface Silicone Breast Implants: Outcome Analysis of 100 Primary Breast Augmentations over 3 Years and Technical Considerations”1 and congratulate him and his team to their recent publication on Motiva implants.2 We would like to particularly applaud Sforza et al. for implementing these novel prostheses in their practice without suffering from a learning curve. In our hands, a technique modification was necessary to achieve stable results using Motiva Ergonomix SilkSurface implants. We feel that applying standard technique sufficient for implantation of textured shaped prostheses may jeopardize outcomes with Motiva Ergonomix SilkSurface devices. We faced a 7 percent revision rate over 3 years in our cohort, with implant dislocation being the most frequent complication. We completely agree with Sforza and colleagues that surgical technique for Motiva Ergonomix SilkSurface implants needs to involve a super tight pocket and a fixation of the inframammary fold. We therefore recommend advanced methods of inframammary fold fixation3 and intraoperative implant pocket assessment.4 Although we have evaluated the performance of Motiva Ergonomix in a smaller but rather homogeneous population of 100 primary breast augmentations with an inframammary approach and submuscular positioning, Sforza et al. have shared their experience with a larger and more heterogeneous cohort of primary augmentations, primary augmentations with mastopexy, secondary augmentations, and secondary augmentation with mastopexy, including different approaches and sites of implant placement. Interestingly, Sforza et al. do not report a difference in complication rates between these groups. Based on our experience, we feel that smoother implants such as Ergonomix should be used with caution when an additional mastopexy procedure is indicated. Textured implants promote early tissue ingrowth,5 facilitating stabilization of the implants within the pocket. The reduced interaction with native tissues of Motiva Ergonomix SilkSurface implants may limit the risk for capsular contracture and permit the implant to better adapt to the normal movement of the breast, but also allow for a degree of mobility, potentially problematic when dealing with a less firm soft-tissue envelope. Financial support from industry is common in breast implant studies.2 Therefore, it can be hard to determine whether study results are reported in an unbiased fashion. It is noteworthy that our study1 was entirely independent of any company’s input and that we achieved a 100 percent satisfaction rate with the postsurgical outcome among both patients and surgeons despite suffering from a learning curve. Although the tale of Goldilocks is typically interpreted today as a discovery of what is “just right,” it was understood differently in the past. It was viewed as a cautionary tale that imparts a lesson about the hazards of wandering off and exploring unknown territory.6 However, doing just that is of pivotal importance for us plastic surgeons. Innovation will be the key to our ongoing success and survival as a specialty. Unlike neurosurgery or cardiology, plastic surgery does not “own” any part of the human body, and our continued growth depends on the development of new solutions to unmet medical needs.7 Therefore, we should never be afraid of trying out new technologies, techniques, and devices. However, it is our responsibility to critically and independently evaluate any innovation no matter how exciting. DISCLOSURE None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products or devices mentioned in this communication. Georg M. Huemer, M.D., M.Sc., M.B.A.Raphael Wenny, M.D.Section of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryKepler University Hospital LinzLinz, and Private practiceWels, Austria Matthias M. Aitzetmüller, M.DDepartment of Plastic and Hand SurgeryTechnical University MunichMunich, Germany Dominik Duscher, M.D.Section of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryKepler University Hospital LinzLinz, Private practiceWels, Austria, and Department of Plastic and Hand SurgeryTechnical University MunichMunich, Germany" @default.
• W2908131418 created "2019-01-11" @default.
• W2908131418 creator A5032071551 @default.
• W2908131418 creator A5036211071 @default.
• W2908131418 creator A5062015227 @default.
• W2908131418 creator A5067557065 @default.
• W2908131418 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2908131418 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2908131418 title "Reply" @default.
• W2908131418 cites W1985319486 @default.
• W2908131418 cites W2020237495 @default.
• W2908131418 cites W2315356787 @default.
• W2908131418 cites W2736711115 @default.
• W2908131418 cites W2755392173 @default.
• W2908131418 cites W2804539517 @default.
• W2908131418 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005147" @default.
• W2908131418 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30418313" @default.
• W2908131418 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2908131418 type Work @default.
• W2908131418 sameAs 2908131418 @default.
• W2908131418 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2908131418 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2908131418 hasAuthorship W2908131418A5032071551 @default.
• W2908131418 hasAuthorship W2908131418A5036211071 @default.
• W2908131418 hasAuthorship W2908131418A5062015227 @default.
• W2908131418 hasAuthorship W2908131418A5067557065 @default.
• W2908131418 hasBestOaLocation W29081314181 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C137762411 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C165383583 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C2776964564 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C2780440149 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C126322002 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C137762411 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C141071460 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C165383583 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C2776964564 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C2780440149 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C2781411149 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C2908647359 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C61434518 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C71924100 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C72563966 @default.
• W2908131418 hasConceptScore W2908131418C99454951 @default.
• W2908131418 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2908131418 hasLocation W29081314181 @default.
• W2908131418 hasLocation W29081314182 @default.
• W2908131418 hasOpenAccess W2908131418 @default.
• W2908131418 hasPrimaryLocation W29081314181 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W1996251312 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W2002067850 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W2008725951 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W2019031881 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W2045673760 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W2068493548 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W2747034889 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W2784868729 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W4206901687 @default.
• W2908131418 hasRelatedWork W823718041 @default.
• W2908131418 hasVolume "143" @default.
• W2908131418 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2908131418 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2908131418 magId "2908131418" @default.
• W2908131418 workType "article" @default.