FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2909409302> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2909409302 endingPage "536" @default.
• W2909409302 startingPage "530" @default.
• W2909409302 abstract "BackgroundTo compare outcomes for complicated appendicitis treated with early versus interval appendectomy and to identify which patients would likely benefit from early appendectomy.MethodsA retrospective review of complicated appendicitis was performed from 2010 to 2015. Patients were divided into early (EA) versus interval appendectomy (IA) groups. We compared demographics, complications and outcomes. Pearson's Chi square analysis and Student's T test analysis were performed.ResultsWe identified 316 patients (EA group 53% vs. IA group 47%). Interval appendectomy group had longer symptom duration [IA 3.8 vs. EA 2.3 days (p = 0.0001)], increased leukocytosis [IA 18.7 vs. EA 17.2 (p = 0.008)], more initial abscesses [IA 35% vs. EA 13% (p = 0.0001)], more complications [IA 30% vs. EA 19%, (p = 0.013) and prolonged total length of stay [(LOS), p = 0.009]. Subgroup analysis of all patients revealed 80% of patients presented with ≤3 cm abscess and duration of symptoms (DOS) ≤5 days. Interval appendectomy patients with DOS ≤5 days and or ≤3 cm abscess on admission had no differences in clinical presentation. However, these patients had prolonged total LOS (IA 7.7 vs. EA 6.3 days, p = 0.01) and increased complications (IA 29% vs. EA 19%, p = 0.04).ConclusionThe majority of patients with complicated appendicitis in children present with small abscess (≤3 cm) and short symptom duration (≤5 days). This subset of patients might benefit from early appendectomy due to decreased LOS, resource utilization and reduced complications. To compare outcomes for complicated appendicitis treated with early versus interval appendectomy and to identify which patients would likely benefit from early appendectomy. A retrospective review of complicated appendicitis was performed from 2010 to 2015. Patients were divided into early (EA) versus interval appendectomy (IA) groups. We compared demographics, complications and outcomes. Pearson's Chi square analysis and Student's T test analysis were performed. We identified 316 patients (EA group 53% vs. IA group 47%). Interval appendectomy group had longer symptom duration [IA 3.8 vs. EA 2.3 days (p = 0.0001)], increased leukocytosis [IA 18.7 vs. EA 17.2 (p = 0.008)], more initial abscesses [IA 35% vs. EA 13% (p = 0.0001)], more complications [IA 30% vs. EA 19%, (p = 0.013) and prolonged total length of stay [(LOS), p = 0.009]. Subgroup analysis of all patients revealed 80% of patients presented with ≤3 cm abscess and duration of symptoms (DOS) ≤5 days. Interval appendectomy patients with DOS ≤5 days and or ≤3 cm abscess on admission had no differences in clinical presentation. However, these patients had prolonged total LOS (IA 7.7 vs. EA 6.3 days, p = 0.01) and increased complications (IA 29% vs. EA 19%, p = 0.04). The majority of patients with complicated appendicitis in children present with small abscess (≤3 cm) and short symptom duration (≤5 days). This subset of patients might benefit from early appendectomy due to decreased LOS, resource utilization and reduced complications." @default.
• W2909409302 created "2019-01-25" @default.
• W2909409302 creator A5015331183 @default.
• W2909409302 creator A5015933076 @default.
• W2909409302 creator A5020263309 @default.
• W2909409302 creator A5022587020 @default.
• W2909409302 creator A5041502405 @default.
• W2909409302 creator A5047977487 @default.
• W2909409302 creator A5064842890 @default.
• W2909409302 creator A5091457886 @default.
• W2909409302 date "2019-10-01" @default.
• W2909409302 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2909409302 title "Abscess and symptoms duration upon presentation should guide decision algorithms for early versus interval appendectomy in children" @default.
• W2909409302 cites W1722321744 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2029964758 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2035858453 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2066302377 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2080993786 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2102770117 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2116593658 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2135440176 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2140780207 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2152326871 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2162735120 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2333903645 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2537405578 @default.
• W2909409302 cites W2585332239 @default.
• W2909409302 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2019.01.005" @default.
• W2909409302 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30737113" @default.
• W2909409302 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2909409302 type Work @default.
• W2909409302 sameAs 2909409302 @default.
• W2909409302 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2909409302 countsByYear W29094093022020 @default.
• W2909409302 countsByYear W29094093022021 @default.
• W2909409302 countsByYear W29094093022022 @default.
• W2909409302 countsByYear W29094093022023 @default.
• W2909409302 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2909409302 hasAuthorship W2909409302A5015331183 @default.
• W2909409302 hasAuthorship W2909409302A5015933076 @default.
• W2909409302 hasAuthorship W2909409302A5020263309 @default.
• W2909409302 hasAuthorship W2909409302A5022587020 @default.
• W2909409302 hasAuthorship W2909409302A5041502405 @default.
• W2909409302 hasAuthorship W2909409302A5047977487 @default.
• W2909409302 hasAuthorship W2909409302A5064842890 @default.
• W2909409302 hasAuthorship W2909409302A5091457886 @default.
• W2909409302 hasBestOaLocation W29094093021 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C2777035434 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C2778923028 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C2780016130 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C126322002 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C141071460 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C144024400 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C149923435 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C167135981 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C187960798 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C2777035434 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C2777601897 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C2778923028 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C2780016130 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C2780084366 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C44249647 @default.
• W2909409302 hasConceptScore W2909409302C71924100 @default.
• W2909409302 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2909409302 hasLocation W29094093021 @default.
• W2909409302 hasLocation W29094093022 @default.
• W2909409302 hasLocation W29094093023 @default.
• W2909409302 hasOpenAccess W2909409302 @default.
• W2909409302 hasPrimaryLocation W29094093021 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W1498432575 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W1515202398 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W1972939890 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W1979941066 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W1999973083 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W2081126084 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W2393339768 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W2486941840 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W2599151900 @default.
• W2909409302 hasRelatedWork W3147008349 @default.
• W2909409302 hasVolume "60" @default.
• W2909409302 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2909409302 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2909409302 magId "2909409302" @default.
• W2909409302 workType "article" @default.