FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2909606691> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2909606691 startingPage "23" @default.
• W2909606691 abstract "Notice and personal jurisdiction have long been fellow procedural law travelers because of their common origins in the mechanics of service of process and the shared due process ancestor in Pennoyer v. Neff. They have a tangled history that is more than just a historical quirk. Notice was once a reliable feature of personal jurisdiction jurisprudence, but slowly faded from prominence in personal jurisdiction analysis after the International Shoe and Mullane decisions, and then fell away almost completely in the post-Asahi era. This Article attempts to answer a few important but surprisingly overlooked questions, namely: when and why did notice break off from personal jurisdiction? And why, despite decades of nearly constant hand-wringing about confusion and chaos in personal jurisdiction, did so few commentators or jurists seem to take note of this development?Once the Supreme Court tied personal jurisdiction to due process, notice was critical in shaping the direction of jurisdictional doctrine. Its role extended beyond that of a mere instrument of doctrinal development. The use of notice was integral to the mode of legal reasoning that the Court employed in its personal jurisdiction journey. This was on account of two key attributes of notice. First, notice, with its tangibility and dependence on mechanical service of process, allowed the Court to navigate the strict formalism of the pre-International Shoe era and the Court’s many returns to formalism in the era of minimum contacts. Second, when the Court wanted to engage in a more functional mode of analysis, notice allowed the Court to continually tie personal jurisdiction to due process because of the intuitive fairness appeal of the ideas of notice and opportunity to be heard. Thus, the Court could lean on notice to provide a veneer of fairness and process, even while supposedly privileging arguments about sovereignty and territoriality. Finally, when the Court made several efforts to limit the scope of personal jurisdiction between International Shoe and the early 1990s, the Court seized upon a different but related concept of notice – notice of jurisdiction – as a due process justification for restricting personal jurisdiction.Restoring notice to personal jurisdiction might be a small yet helpful part of a strategy to impose normative and doctrinal order on personal jurisdiction chaos. This “notice-inclusive approach” focuses on reestablishing comfort with the inclusion of easily-satisfied due process considerations while also stressing that constitutional notice doctrine itself might be strengthened in small but strategic ways, thus adding some additional due process protections both to notice and to personal jurisdiction. Reincorporating notice in specific jurisdiction analysis would broaden the doctrine and sharpen its boundaries by refocusing analysis on the relationship between personal jurisdiction and other procedural protections with a due process component. Finally, returning notice to personal jurisdiction might pave the way for a less restrictive, yet still appropriately constrained, approach to general jurisdiction." @default.
• W2909606691 created "2019-01-25" @default.
• W2909606691 creator A5019573445 @default.
• W2909606691 date "2018-01-01" @default.
• W2909606691 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2909606691 title "The Lost Story of Notice and Personal Jurisdiction" @default.
• W2909606691 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2909606691 type Work @default.
• W2909606691 sameAs 2909606691 @default.
• W2909606691 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2909606691 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2909606691 hasAuthorship W2909606691A5019573445 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConcept C2778495862 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConcept C2779913896 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConcept C87501996 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConceptScore W2909606691C17744445 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConceptScore W2909606691C199539241 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConceptScore W2909606691C2776211767 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConceptScore W2909606691C2776949292 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConceptScore W2909606691C2778272461 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConceptScore W2909606691C2778495862 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConceptScore W2909606691C2779913896 @default.
• W2909606691 hasConceptScore W2909606691C87501996 @default.
• W2909606691 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2909606691 hasLocation W29096066911 @default.
• W2909606691 hasOpenAccess W2909606691 @default.
• W2909606691 hasPrimaryLocation W29096066911 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W1501162029 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W1528740383 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W1554855923 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W1584738684 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W1589464540 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W187328258 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W1942257780 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W2020964503 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W2229120737 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W2255943379 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W2259503676 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W233465426 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W2518554466 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W2790157778 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W3121446480 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W3123120948 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W3123302356 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W3124998576 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W3213516924 @default.
• W2909606691 hasRelatedWork W947853290 @default.
• W2909606691 hasVolume "74" @default.
• W2909606691 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2909606691 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2909606691 magId "2909606691" @default.
• W2909606691 workType "article" @default.