FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2909829932> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2909829932 endingPage "e50" @default.
• W2909829932 startingPage "e44" @default.
• W2909829932 abstract "For external beam stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastatic lesions, it is difficult to select optimal treatment isocenters because the orientation and volume of each planning target volume (PTV) and its proximity to critical structures are unique for each patient. The RayStation treatment planning system offers Python-based scripting to optimize the placement of the treatment isocenter by comparing scenario-based plans. This can improve the plan quality by reducing the dose to the normal brain and increasing planning efficiency. The purpose of the current study was to compare the isocenter-optimized plans generated by RayStation with clinical plans created by the Pinnacle treatment planning system and to validate the RayStation treatment planning and delivery with end-to-end testing. Ten patient plans were automatically regenerated using the script in RayStation. For each patient, 4 plans with 4 different types of isocenters were generated: (1) 2 separate isocenters at the PTV centroids, (2) a single isocenter at the mid-point of 2 centroids, (3) a single isocenter at PTV1, and (4) a single isocenter at PTV2. The best plans were compared with paired Pinnacle plans using plan quality parameters, including normal brain volume excluding PTVs receiving 4 Gy (V4Gy), normal brain volume excluding PTVs receiving 12 Gy (V12Gy), maximum dose to the brainstem, homogeneity index, conformity indices, gradient index of each PTV, and monitor units per fraction. All plans were verified with a cylindrical quality assurance phantom, and end-to-end testing was performed with an anthropomorphic head phantom with a radiochromic film. The script was executed within 5-6 minutes to generate 4 scenario-based automatic plans. The homogeneity index and conformity indices showed small but statistically significant improvement with the RayStation plans. The gradient index (3.9 ± 0.9 for Pinnacle and 3.5 ± 0.6 for RayStation, p = 0.04) was also more favorable in the RayStation plans. V12Gy was significantly reduced by 13% and V4Gy was reduced by 5%. The total monitor units per fraction was significantly reduced by 20% for the RayStation plans. Plan optimization time using RayStation was reduced by 64%. The measured doses at each PTV centroid agreed within 3%, and all RayStation plans passed quality assurance verification tests. Scenario-based automatic plan generation using Python scripting helps identify an optimal treatment isocenter to reduce the dose to the normal brain and improve planning efficiency. RayStation plans provided better plan quality, especially lower doses to the normal brain, than Pinnacle plans. Thus, RayStation is a suitable planning modality for hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases." @default.
• W2909829932 created "2019-01-25" @default.
• W2909829932 creator A5009240932 @default.
• W2909829932 creator A5024625434 @default.
• W2909829932 creator A5062733077 @default.
• W2909829932 creator A5085994333 @default.
• W2909829932 creator A5088198448 @default.
• W2909829932 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2909829932 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2909829932 title "End-to-end testing of automatic plan optimization using RayStation scripting for hypofractionated multimetastatic brain stereotactic radiosurgery" @default.
• W2909829932 cites W1596629765 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W1766681588 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W1965093633 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2069289885 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2106598609 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2128055396 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2159314579 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2183101157 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2196301388 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2514720131 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2613196702 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2737954683 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2750557488 @default.
• W2909829932 cites W2791042095 @default.
• W2909829932 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2018.12.006" @default.
• W2909829932 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30655170" @default.
• W2909829932 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2909829932 type Work @default.
• W2909829932 sameAs 2909829932 @default.
• W2909829932 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2909829932 countsByYear W29098299322020 @default.
• W2909829932 countsByYear W29098299322022 @default.
• W2909829932 countsByYear W29098299322023 @default.
• W2909829932 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2909829932 hasAuthorship W2909829932A5009240932 @default.
• W2909829932 hasAuthorship W2909829932A5024625434 @default.
• W2909829932 hasAuthorship W2909829932A5062733077 @default.
• W2909829932 hasAuthorship W2909829932A5085994333 @default.
• W2909829932 hasAuthorship W2909829932A5088198448 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C106436119 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C181401712 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C2776017024 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C2776713427 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C2778618615 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C104293457 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C106436119 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C126838900 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C142724271 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C181401712 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C19527891 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C201645570 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C2776017024 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C2776713427 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C2778618615 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C2780387249 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C2989005 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C509974204 @default.
• W2909829932 hasConceptScore W2909829932C71924100 @default.
• W2909829932 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2909829932 hasLocation W29098299321 @default.
• W2909829932 hasLocation W29098299322 @default.
• W2909829932 hasOpenAccess W2909829932 @default.
• W2909829932 hasPrimaryLocation W29098299321 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W1967584914 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W1969405791 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W1970665426 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W2017617205 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W2025656351 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W2048241981 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W2057734384 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W2092768883 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W2804043066 @default.
• W2909829932 hasRelatedWork W4221022572 @default.
• W2909829932 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2909829932 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2909829932 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2909829932 magId "2909829932" @default.
• W2909829932 workType "article" @default.