FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2909848609> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2909848609 endingPage "306" @default.
• W2909848609 startingPage "287" @default.
• W2909848609 abstract "Abstract Aim The aim of the current systematic review was to critically appraise evidence from randomized and prospective non‐randomized comparative clinical trials about the efficacy of lateral bone augmentation prior to implant placement and their outcome regarding bone width gain. Materials and Methods Eight databases were searched until May 2018 for randomized and prospective non‐randomized comparative trials on lateral bone augmentation prior to implant placement. After elimination of duplicate studies, data extraction and risk‐of‐bias assessment according to the Cochrane guidelines, random‐effects meta‐analyses of mean differences ( MD ) or relative risks ( RR ) and their 95% CI s were performed, followed by subgroup, meta‐regression and sensitivity analyses. Results Overall, 25 trials (16 randomized/9 non‐randomized) were identified, which included a total of 553 patients (42.2% male; mean age of 43.9 years). In these included studies and populations, various modalities for primary lateral bone augmentation rendered implant placement feasible. Small discrepancies were found between overall clinical and radiographic gain (pooled gains of 3.45 ± 1.18 mm versus 2.90 ± 0.83 mm, respectively), but were not statistically significant. Bone width gain was significantly inversely associated with baseline bone width (pooled effect: −0.35 mm/mm; 95% CI : −0.63 to −0.07 mm; p = 0.01). Additionally, % graft resorption was associated with patient age (36%/year, 95% CI : −0.62 to −0.11 mm; p = 0.01). The presence of xenograft added to autologous graft led to less resorption compared to autologous graft alone ( MD : 1.06 mm; 95% CI : 0.21 to 1.92 mm; p = 0.01). Barrier membrane did not yield significant difference in terms of bone width gain ( MD : −0.33 mm; 95% CI : −2.24 to 1.58 mm; p > 0.05) and graft resorption ( MD : 0.84 mm; 95% CI : −1.42 to 3.09 mm; p > 0.05). However, the quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate due to bias and imprecision. Conclusions Initially smaller bone dimensions are associated with favours larger bone width gain, which indicates that a severe lateral bone deficiency can be effectively augmented applying primary lateral bone augmentation. Both Patients’ age and recipient site (maxilla or mandible) seem to influence graft resorption. The addition of a xenograft can be helpful in reducing graft resorption. Existing evidence from randomized and prospective non‐randomized trials on humans indicates that lateral bone augmentation prior to implant placement can successfully increase bone width. There are some indications that patient‐related, site‐related, and technique‐related characteristics might influence the amount of gained bone width, but the quality of evidence is for the most part hampered by the small number of existing studies and methodological limitations that might lead to bias." @default.
• W2909848609 created "2019-01-25" @default.
• W2909848609 creator A5031970255 @default.
• W2909848609 creator A5052953612 @default.
• W2909848609 creator A5058663306 @default.
• W2909848609 creator A5061123244 @default.
• W2909848609 date "2019-06-01" @default.
• W2909848609 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2909848609 title "Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation prior to implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis" @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1506326987 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1540502755 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1690010335 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1784175517 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1972410798 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1974975370 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1975124641 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1977733462 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1978097115 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W1984698977 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2006040715 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2010824427 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2012171526 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2014525158 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2018207099 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2035100455 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2047536663 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2049543958 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2051776282 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2066673805 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2072086412 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2085664071 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2091003267 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2097399298 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2108143331 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2113222558 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2133482750 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2136403658 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2139845851 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2140228447 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2144112749 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2160483303 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2164371300 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2165878497 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2171136775 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2239631772 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2290731438 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2300019087 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2336666948 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2501718956 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2517894901 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2531269403 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2576440140 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2767089219 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2769339210 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2773433496 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2783472197 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2792308249 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2792666988 @default.
• W2909848609 cites W2909848609 @default.
• W2909848609 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13052" @default.
• W2909848609 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30624791" @default.
• W2909848609 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2909848609 type Work @default.
• W2909848609 sameAs 2909848609 @default.
• W2909848609 citedByCount "58" @default.
• W2909848609 countsByYear W29098486092019 @default.
• W2909848609 countsByYear W29098486092020 @default.
• W2909848609 countsByYear W29098486092021 @default.
• W2909848609 countsByYear W29098486092022 @default.
• W2909848609 countsByYear W29098486092023 @default.
• W2909848609 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2909848609 hasAuthorship W2909848609A5031970255 @default.
• W2909848609 hasAuthorship W2909848609A5052953612 @default.
• W2909848609 hasAuthorship W2909848609A5058663306 @default.
• W2909848609 hasAuthorship W2909848609A5061123244 @default.
• W2909848609 hasBestOaLocation W29098486091 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C673006 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C126322002 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C141071460 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C168563851 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C187960798 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C188816634 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C199343813 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C2781411149 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C44249647 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C673006 @default.
• W2909848609 hasConceptScore W2909848609C71924100 @default.

• next