FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2910570566> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2910570566 endingPage "136" @default.
• W2910570566 startingPage "126" @default.
• W2910570566 abstract "Abstract Introduction Women’s sense of attractiveness and body image, and the impact of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) over these constructs, are likely influenced by social and cultural background. Aim To evaluate sexual function and body image in women with POP, to compare the sense of attractiveness between women with and without POP, and to translate the Body Image in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (BIPOP) questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese and validate it in this population. Methods In this cross-sectional study of 105 Brazilian women with POP, we administered the BIPOP (scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating worse body image), the Female Sexual Function Inventory (FSFI) (scored from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating lower risk for sexual dysfunction), and the Attractiveness subscale of the Body Attitudes Scale questionnaire (BAQ) (scored from 5 to 35, with higher score indicating better body image). We also included 100 control women who completed the BAQ Attractiveness subscale questionnaire. Main Outcome Measure The main outcome measure included BIPOP, FSFI, and BAQ Attractiveness scores. Results Mean BIPOP scores were 3.09 ± 1.08 in women with any POP, 3.05 ± 1.00 in those with lesser-stage POP (1 or 2), and 3.13 ± 1.15 in those with advanced-stage POP (3 or 4). There were no significant differences in score according to prolapse staging (P = .71). FSFI scores were independently associated with BIPOP scores (β = –0.052; P = .02). The mean scores for the BAQ Attractiveness subscale was 17.01 ± 4.07 in women with POP and 16.97 ± 4.60 in those without POP (P = .93). Older age was the sole characteristic associated with being sexually inactive in women with POP; regarding sexual function, a better body image and higher attractiveness scores were independently associated with a higher FSFI score. As for the Portuguese validation of the BIPOP instrument, the adapted version maintained good internal consistency (α = 0.908), good reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.94), and adequate construct validity. Clinical Implications Women with POP may not relate sexual function or attractiveness to POP extension. An impaired body image is associated with worse perception of attractiveness and increased risk for sexual dysfunction. Strength & Limitations As strengths, we used a specific genital body image scale, and this is first study of its kind among Brazilian women. As for weaknesses, we encountered low educational levels in the women with POP. Conclusion Among women with POP, the anatomic features of the prolapse do not seem to interfere with genital body image or with sexual function. In addition, the presence of POP was not associated with being sexually active or inactive." @default.
• W2910570566 created "2019-01-25" @default.
• W2910570566 creator A5009311665 @default.
• W2910570566 creator A5024168812 @default.
• W2910570566 creator A5055949981 @default.
• W2910570566 creator A5065151732 @default.
• W2910570566 creator A5090703434 @default.
• W2910570566 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2910570566 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2910570566 title "Assessment of Body Image, Sexual Function, and Attractiveness in Women With Genital Prolapse: A Cross-Sectional Study With Validation of the Body Image in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (BIPOP) Questionnaire" @default.
• W2910570566 cites W1973811492 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W1975762848 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2001359630 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2009785563 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2026075328 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2034205697 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2048946213 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2052481652 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2061935394 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2068461529 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2077195823 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2081571455 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2090919433 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2097136763 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2099635374 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2112997260 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2116740901 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2120385927 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2122705437 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2131148583 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2151851375 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2156390795 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2328512849 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2340780054 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2556562708 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2566366401 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2599793049 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W2806004342 @default.
• W2910570566 cites W308096105 @default.
• W2910570566 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.11.005" @default.
• W2910570566 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30621920" @default.
• W2910570566 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2910570566 type Work @default.
• W2910570566 sameAs 2910570566 @default.
• W2910570566 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2910570566 countsByYear W29105705662020 @default.
• W2910570566 countsByYear W29105705662021 @default.
• W2910570566 countsByYear W29105705662022 @default.
• W2910570566 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2910570566 hasAuthorship W2910570566A5009311665 @default.
• W2910570566 hasAuthorship W2910570566A5024168812 @default.
• W2910570566 hasAuthorship W2910570566A5055949981 @default.
• W2910570566 hasAuthorship W2910570566A5065151732 @default.
• W2910570566 hasAuthorship W2910570566A5090703434 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C142052008 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C183021626 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C2775871022 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C2778093883 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C31173074 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C11171543 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C126322002 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C142052008 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C142724271 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C15744967 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C183021626 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C1862650 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C2775871022 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C2778093883 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C2908647359 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C29456083 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C31173074 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C54355233 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C71924100 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C86803240 @default.
• W2910570566 hasConceptScore W2910570566C99454951 @default.
• W2910570566 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2910570566 hasLocation W29105705661 @default.
• W2910570566 hasLocation W29105705662 @default.
• W2910570566 hasOpenAccess W2910570566 @default.
• W2910570566 hasPrimaryLocation W29105705661 @default.
• W2910570566 hasRelatedWork W1563191734 @default.
• W2910570566 hasRelatedWork W1969636149 @default.
• W2910570566 hasRelatedWork W1983234268 @default.
• W2910570566 hasRelatedWork W2006273496 @default.
• W2910570566 hasRelatedWork W2091834049 @default.
• W2910570566 hasRelatedWork W2118177714 @default.
• W2910570566 hasRelatedWork W2327200445 @default.

• next