FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2911555068> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2911555068 endingPage "464" @default.
• W2911555068 startingPage "464" @default.
• W2911555068 abstract "1.Appraise existing literature regarding the implementation of telehealth palliative care, with attention to the patient populations studied.2.Review the methods, findings, and experiences of a pilot telehealth initiative at an urban, safety net palliative care clinic.3.Reflect on lessons learned and formulate approaches to overcoming barriers to completing tele-visits, for vulnerable patients. No-show rates for palliative care clinic visits can be high (21-36% in our setting), frequently due to severe illness, limited transportation, or fatigue from multiple appointments. Telehealth visits may expand access to community-based palliative care for these complex patients. To explore the feasibility of telehealth visits with vulnerable patients in an urban, safety net palliative care clinic. We developed a brief technology access survey to assess patients' access to email and necessary technology, and experience with videoconferencing. The survey was professionally translated into Spanish and Chinese. All patients who completed in-person clinic visits between November 2017 and May 2018 were eligible to participate. Patients who reported access to the necessary technology were offered training to complete televisits. During the study period, 109 patients completed in-person visits. Patients were 26% Latino, 24% Asian/Pacific Islander, 21% African American, and 20% Caucasian; 34% had Limited English Proficiency, and 10% were either marginally housed or homeless. 89 patients (82%) completed the survey. 60 patients (67%) reported access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer and were screened for eligibility. 18 (20%) were deemed ineligible due to significant sensory impairment, cognitive impairment, or limited technology experience. Of the 42 patients eligible for televisits, only 11 (26%) accepted training for televisits. The most common reasons patients declined were preference for in-person visits and lack of WiFi access. 5 patients were scheduled for televisits, and 4 completed visits (4%). The no-show rate for televisits was lower than the general clinic during the same time period (20% vs. 26%). In our setting, likely 10-20% of patients have the access, capability, and interest to attempt televisits. More study is needed to determine whether these patients no-show at lower rates for televisits compared to in-person clinic visits." @default.
• W2911555068 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2911555068 creator A5004562948 @default.
• W2911555068 creator A5032697405 @default.
• W2911555068 creator A5033541228 @default.
• W2911555068 date "2019-02-01" @default.
• W2911555068 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2911555068 title "Got WiFi? Exploring the Feasibility of Televisits Among Vulnerable Patients (QI716)" @default.
• W2911555068 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.225" @default.
• W2911555068 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2911555068 type Work @default.
• W2911555068 sameAs 2911555068 @default.
• W2911555068 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2911555068 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2911555068 hasAuthorship W2911555068A5004562948 @default.
• W2911555068 hasAuthorship W2911555068A5032697405 @default.
• W2911555068 hasAuthorship W2911555068A5033541228 @default.
• W2911555068 hasBestOaLocation W29115550681 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C2775832928 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C2781050511 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C2994186709 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C143998085 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C159110408 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C160735492 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C162324750 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C2775832928 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C2779891985 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C2781050511 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C2994186709 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C50522688 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C512399662 @default.
• W2911555068 hasConceptScore W2911555068C71924100 @default.
• W2911555068 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2911555068 hasLocation W29115550681 @default.
• W2911555068 hasOpenAccess W2911555068 @default.
• W2911555068 hasPrimaryLocation W29115550681 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W2782234760 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W2796207404 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W2973738032 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W3047821268 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W3094323505 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W3112264632 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W3206214669 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W4205325621 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W4205566141 @default.
• W2911555068 hasRelatedWork W4229443860 @default.
• W2911555068 hasVolume "57" @default.
• W2911555068 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2911555068 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2911555068 magId "2911555068" @default.
• W2911555068 workType "article" @default.