FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2911610299> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2911610299 endingPage "S1471" @default.
• W2911610299 startingPage "S1470" @default.
• W2911610299 abstract "Introduction: A good bowel preparation that ensures adequate colonic mucosal visualization during colonoscopy is essential to detect colon polyps and other colon pathologies. Suboptimal bowel preparation leads to lower adenoma detection rate (ADR), a key quality indicator and crucial component for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Polyethylene glycol with electrolytes (Golytely) is the commonest formulation used for bowel preparation at our hospital center. A few studies have shown that split administration of Golytely is superior to previous day administration. However, studies comparing the three regimens of Golytely administration, the previous day, split, and same day regimens are scarce. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent screening colonoscopies at our hospital between October 1, 2014, and July 31, 2016, were included. The patients were divided into three groups based on the regimen of PEG solution administered. Demographic data, social history, medical comorbidities, HbA1C, colonoscopy findings and polyp pathology were collected and Adenoma detection rate (ADR) was calculated. Data between the three groups were compared and analyzed using SAS software and a two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 810 patients were included in the study, 42.4% males and 57.6% females. They were divided into Group-A, split regimen (n=308); Group B, same day regimen (n= 252); and Group C, previous day regimen (n =250). The average age in the three groups were 57, 57.3 and 59.3 years respectively. The average BMI was 29.6, 29.7 and 28.7 in Group A, B, and C respectively. Comparison of quality of bowel preparation between the three groups showed that the split day regimen had the higher percentage of adequate (adequate = excellent + good) preparation (83%) compared to same day (74%) and previous day regimens (64%). The Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) was significantly higher in the split day regimen group (18%) compared to the previous day group (11.5%), p = 0.03. Conclusion: Our study shows that split administration of PEG solution provided the higher percentage of adequate (excellent and good) bowel preparation compared to other regimens of PEG administration. It also provided statistically significant higher Adenoma Detection Rate compared to previous day regimen (p= 0.03). The split regimen was observed to provide a higher quality of bowel preparation in people with BMI >30 (Obese) compared to the other regimens of PEG.Table: Table. Comparison of general factors between bowel preparation regimens" @default.
• W2911610299 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2911610299 creator A5017302492 @default.
• W2911610299 creator A5024152876 @default.
• W2911610299 creator A5053962925 @default.
• W2911610299 creator A5057056629 @default.
• W2911610299 creator A5087716685 @default.
• W2911610299 date "2017-10-01" @default.
• W2911610299 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2911610299 title "Comparison of Quality of Bowel Preparation With Different Regimens of Polyethylene Glycol in Inner City Minority Population" @default.
• W2911610299 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201710001-02706" @default.
• W2911610299 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2911610299 type Work @default.
• W2911610299 sameAs 2911610299 @default.
• W2911610299 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2911610299 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2911610299 hasAuthorship W2911610299A5017302492 @default.
• W2911610299 hasAuthorship W2911610299A5024152876 @default.
• W2911610299 hasAuthorship W2911610299A5053962925 @default.
• W2911610299 hasAuthorship W2911610299A5057056629 @default.
• W2911610299 hasAuthorship W2911610299A5087716685 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C2777428134 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C2781413609 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C3019222653 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C121608353 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C126322002 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C141071460 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C2777428134 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C2778435480 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C2781413609 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C2908647359 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C3019222653 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C526805850 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C71924100 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C90924648 @default.
• W2911610299 hasConceptScore W2911610299C99454951 @default.
• W2911610299 hasLocation W29116102991 @default.
• W2911610299 hasOpenAccess W2911610299 @default.
• W2911610299 hasPrimaryLocation W29116102991 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2062331995 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2072360301 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2127651150 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2221963052 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2313824550 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2417774362 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2588162698 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2944981773 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W2949129511 @default.
• W2911610299 hasRelatedWork W3029016851 @default.
• W2911610299 hasVolume "112" @default.
• W2911610299 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2911610299 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2911610299 magId "2911610299" @default.
• W2911610299 workType "article" @default.