FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2911837048> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2911837048 endingPage "26" @default.
• W2911837048 startingPage "12" @default.
• W2911837048 abstract "Background: Structural members subjected to strong earthquakes undergo stiffness and strength degradation. To predict accurately the seismic behaviour of structures, nonlinear static methods of analysis have been developed in scientific literature. Generally, nonlinear static methods perform the pushover analysis by applying a monotonic lateral load. However, every earthquake input is characterized by several repeated loads with reverse in signs and the strength and deformation capacities of structures are generally related to the cumulative damage. This aspect is neglected by the conventional monotonic approaches, which tend to overestimate the strength and stiffness of structural members. Objective: This paper aims to investigate the possibility that the Cyclic Pushover Analysis (CPA) may be used as a tool to assess the seismic behaviour of structures. During the CPA, the structure is subjected to a distribution of horizontal forces that is reversed in sign when predefined peak displacements of the reference node are attained. This process repeats in cycles previously determined in a loading protocol. Methods: To investigate the effectiveness of the CPA in predicting the structural response, a steel moment resisting frame is designed as a case study building. A numerical model of this frame is developed in OpenSees. To examine the influence of the loading protocols on the seismic response, the CPA is run following the ATC-24 and the SAC protocols. Additionally, the seismic demand of the case study frame is determined by a Monotonic Pushover Analysis (MPA) and by Incremental nonlinear Dynamic Analysis (IDA). Results and Conclusions: The following results are obtained: • Despite the differences between the SAC and the ATC-24 loading protocols, the CPA applied according to those two protocols led to almost the same structural response of the case study frame. • The CPA showed the capability of catching the stiffness and strength degradation, which is otherwise neglected by the MPA. In fact, given a base shear or peak ground acceleration, the CPA leads to the estimation of larger displacement demands compared to the MPA. • During long (or medium) duration earthquakes, the CPA was necessary to estimate accurately the response of the structure. In fact, at a PGA equal to 1 g, the CPA estimated the top displacement demand with an error lower than 10%, while the MPA underestimated it by 18%. • The importance of considering the cyclic deterioration is shown at local level by the damage indexes of the frame. In the case of long earthquakes, given a top displacement of 600 mm (corresponding to a PGA equal to 1 g), the CPA estimated the damage indexes with an error equal to 12%." @default.
• W2911837048 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2911837048 creator A5030493104 @default.
• W2911837048 creator A5034634060 @default.
• W2911837048 creator A5038614387 @default.
• W2911837048 creator A5044233014 @default.
• W2911837048 creator A5047184335 @default.
• W2911837048 date "2019-01-31" @default.
• W2911837048 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2911837048 title "Seismic Assessment of Steel MRFs by Cyclic Pushover Analysis" @default.
• W2911837048 cites W1973555131 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W1993086435 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2034933422 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2042777996 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2060169405 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2072647798 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2074036306 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2082742692 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2098480896 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2130213987 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2141371779 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2155069930 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2167893445 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2168106350 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2169445860 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2342606880 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2592875828 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2608136691 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2618671147 @default.
• W2911837048 cites W2897033245 @default.
• W2911837048 doi "https://doi.org/10.2174/18748368019130012" @default.
• W2911837048 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2911837048 type Work @default.
• W2911837048 sameAs 2911837048 @default.
• W2911837048 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2911837048 countsByYear W29118370482019 @default.
• W2911837048 countsByYear W29118370482020 @default.
• W2911837048 countsByYear W29118370482023 @default.
• W2911837048 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2911837048 hasAuthorship W2911837048A5030493104 @default.
• W2911837048 hasAuthorship W2911837048A5034634060 @default.
• W2911837048 hasAuthorship W2911837048A5038614387 @default.
• W2911837048 hasAuthorship W2911837048A5044233014 @default.
• W2911837048 hasAuthorship W2911837048A5047184335 @default.
• W2911837048 hasBestOaLocation W29118370481 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C123060433 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C126042441 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C135628077 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C140590641 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C158622935 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C179254644 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C182358397 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C2779372316 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C62611344 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C72169020 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C74650414 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConcept C8128475 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C121332964 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C123060433 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C126042441 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C127413603 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C134306372 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C135628077 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C140590641 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C158622935 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C179254644 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C182358397 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C187320778 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C2779372316 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C33923547 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C62520636 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C62611344 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C66938386 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C72169020 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C74650414 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C76155785 @default.
• W2911837048 hasConceptScore W2911837048C8128475 @default.
• W2911837048 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2911837048 hasLocation W29118370481 @default.
• W2911837048 hasOpenAccess W2911837048 @default.
• W2911837048 hasPrimaryLocation W29118370481 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W2014896277 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W2388024422 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W2508308768 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W2789281371 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W2911837048 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W2943381650 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W2956064437 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W3016857074 @default.
• W2911837048 hasRelatedWork W3194153656 @default.

• next