FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912010127> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912010127 endingPage "71" @default.
• W2912010127 startingPage "56" @default.
• W2912010127 abstract "Several decades of organizational justice research consistently show that employees accept the decisions made by organizations and authorities and are satisfied with them when they perceive those decisions to be fair (Colquitt et al., 2012). It is usually agreed that perceived fairness of decision outcomes (or distributive justice), decision making procedures (or procedural justice), and the behavior of decision makers (or interactional justice) depend on their correspondence with certain justice principles or rules (Cropanzano et al., 2001). However, even strict adherence to justice rules does not always help to attain fairness, and different goals of various HRM decisions require the application of different justice rules (Cropanzano & Ambrose, 2015). Moreover, some studies show that the fairness of employee judgments are based on those justice rules that allow to attain favorable results (Brockner & Wiesenfeld, 2005). However, such a selective application of justice rules is more intuitive than based on careful investigation. A systematic investigation is needed to determine the relative importance or weight of justice rules in various HRM decisions and how it depends on decision favorability. Therefore, the study was conducted with the aim to analyze the role of decision favorability and justice rules in determining perceived fairness across HRM decisions of performance appraisal, pay, benefits and opportunity to develop. 440 employees were surveyed. Thirty percent of the respondents were male, seventy percent were female. The average age of respondents was 39.75 years, with 6.06 years of tenure in the organization. 25.5 percent of study participants were middle-level managers and 74.5 percent were subordinates. The results of the study reveal that decision favorability predicts the perceived justice of HRM decision outcomes, decision-making procedures and decision makers above and beyond fairness rules. When a favorable decision is made, the decision-making procedures, interpersonal treatment and the decisions themselves are perceived to be fairer. This result applies to all decisions investigated. Moreover, decision favorability also determines the weight of justice rules in predicting distributive, procedural and interactional justice of HRM decisions. An unfavorable performance appraisal decision is perceived to be fairer when it is equal for all employees, but not when it is favorable. Furthermore, an unfavorable pay decision is perceived to be fairer when it is equal and less equitable, while pay raise is perceived as fairer when it is equitable and not equal to other employees; also, when the decision maker provides all information and behaves properly. In addition, when an employee is awarded with benefits, fairness of procedures is based on their accuracy. Finally, when an employee is deprived of the opportunity to develop, decision making procedures are evaluated as fairer when they are accurate and the decision maker provides explanation. On the contrary, when an employee is awarded with an opportunity to develop, the accuracy of procedures and the explanation of a decision become less important for fairness judgements." @default.
• W2912010127 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912010127 creator A5025456073 @default.
• W2912010127 date "2017-07-05" @default.
• W2912010127 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2912010127 title "DOES FAVORABLE MEAN FAIR? AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE FAIRNESS OF HRM DECISIONS" @default.
• W2912010127 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2912010127 type Work @default.
• W2912010127 sameAs 2912010127 @default.
• W2912010127 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2912010127 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912010127 hasAuthorship W2912010127A5025456073 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C2777873905 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C2778412681 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C2779149496 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C2779359184 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C2780129364 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConcept C83030740 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C105795698 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C120936955 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C139621336 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C15744967 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C162324750 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C169760540 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C175444787 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C187736073 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C26760741 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C2777873905 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C2778412681 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C2779149496 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C2779359184 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C2780129364 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C33923547 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C77805123 @default.
• W2912010127 hasConceptScore W2912010127C83030740 @default.
• W2912010127 hasIssue "55" @default.
• W2912010127 hasLocation W29120101271 @default.
• W2912010127 hasOpenAccess W2912010127 @default.
• W2912010127 hasPrimaryLocation W29120101271 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W1821032854 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W1964318775 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W1966365759 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W1985728294 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W1994677496 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2063003012 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2087245834 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2089403437 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2138865976 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2158136827 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2159178555 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2174286397 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2340389725 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2761803456 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2800306777 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2889131947 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W2993042476 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W3119129619 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W3129844559 @default.
• W2912010127 hasRelatedWork W50114680 @default.
• W2912010127 hasVolume "55" @default.
• W2912010127 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2912010127 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2912010127 magId "2912010127" @default.
• W2912010127 workType "article" @default.