FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912095552> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912095552 endingPage "52" @default.
• W2912095552 startingPage "43" @default.
• W2912095552 abstract "Originating from the physical sciences, the concept of resilience has gained significance in the psychological and social sciences in recent decades, especially in the wake of the shift in emphasis from a deficiency model of human functioning to a more positive framework delving into efficiency and well-being. Psychological resilience denotes the ability of an individual or a system to recover from a setback, adapt well in the face of trauma, and survive and thrive despite significant adversity and stress. Etymologically the word resilience has its origins in the Latin verb ‘salire’ meaning ‘to jump’ and a term derived from it – ‘re-salire’, which means ‘to jump back’. Being resilient does not merely imply dealing effectively with stress or adversity but denotes a ‘springing back’ into action as a more effective entity adapting to the negative incidence and construing it as a stepping stone towards positive behaviours, adaptation, and growth. Bonanno (2004) emphasises that resilience is not only about bouncing back into action but is also about being able to sustain the adaptive behaviour. The concept of resilience is used across disciplines and in varied contexts; however, the core components of defining resilience are evident in each instance, i.e. exposure to significant adversity and positive adaptation, even growth in response to the stress (Luthar, 2006). Luthar’s definition that posits resilience as a two-part construct has been accepted by other scholars too (Masten, 2001; Yates, Egeland, & Sroufe, 2003). In this perspective, resilience is inferred by the coping behaviour demonstrated by an individual or a system in the face of substantial risk or adversity, and this differentiates resilient coping from normative coping. A related perspective defines resilience as normal development under adverse circumstances (Fonagy, Steele, Steele, Higgit, & Target, 1994; Masten, 2001). Another recent definition is given by Rutter who defines resilience as the relative resistance to psychosocial risk experiences (Rutter, 1999, 2000). Drawing from a variety of definitions, resilience can be conceptualised as good psychological functioning and behavioural outcomes despite facing adverse circumstances that are expected to jeopardise the normative growth and adaptation of the individual or system (Bonanno, 2004; Masten, 2001; Rutter, 2006). This conceptualisation of resilience has found applications in a variety of contexts and fields, beginning with psychopathology, developmental psychology, and disaster management to newer areas like intervention and rehabilitation programmes for war-affected communities, and people affected by ethno-political conflicts. Within the psychological literature, three general uses of the term resilience have been recognised (Werner, 1995) – good developmental outcomes despite high-risk status, sustained competence under stress, and recovery from trauma. These usesalso denote the contexts of recognising resilient behaviour and indicate the path that resilience as a psychological construct has traversed." @default.
• W2912095552 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912095552 creator A5000256291 @default.
• W2912095552 creator A5031527568 @default.
• W2912095552 date "2016-08-05" @default.
• W2912095552 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2912095552 title "Psychological resilience: a conceptual review of theory and research" @default.
• W2912095552 doi "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666716-11" @default.
• W2912095552 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2912095552 type Work @default.
• W2912095552 sameAs 2912095552 @default.
• W2912095552 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2912095552 countsByYear W29120955522018 @default.
• W2912095552 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912095552 hasAuthorship W2912095552A5000256291 @default.
• W2912095552 hasAuthorship W2912095552A5031527568 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConcept C137176749 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConcept C73282008 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConceptScore W2912095552C118552586 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConceptScore W2912095552C137176749 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConceptScore W2912095552C15744967 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConceptScore W2912095552C180747234 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConceptScore W2912095552C73282008 @default.
• W2912095552 hasConceptScore W2912095552C77805123 @default.
• W2912095552 hasLocation W29120955521 @default.
• W2912095552 hasOpenAccess W2912095552 @default.
• W2912095552 hasPrimaryLocation W29120955521 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W101418886 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W1994771686 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W200483920 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2036638407 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2160228987 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2293655039 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2402098477 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2404715865 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2413673642 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2464963430 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2483724488 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2507097756 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2559776708 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2581134904 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2743459742 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2768371471 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2906458004 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2908163916 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W2991295630 @default.
• W2912095552 hasRelatedWork W3013691480 @default.
• W2912095552 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2912095552 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2912095552 magId "2912095552" @default.
• W2912095552 workType "article" @default.