FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912110515> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912110515 endingPage "165" @default.
• W2912110515 startingPage "157" @default.
• W2912110515 abstract "ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a retrograde tibial approach in revascularization of lower extremities for treatment of ischemia in anatomically challenging patients.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 57 procedures performed between 2012 and 2016 using the retrograde approach to treat patients with flush occlusion, inability to cross the lesion, failed bypass, or hostile groin. Demographic data, Rutherford classes, vessels treated, and approach were noted. Type of procedure, complications, amputations, deaths, and patency of access tibial vessels and treated vessels were recorded. Ultrasound-guided tibial access was achieved through the anterior tibial artery, posterior tibial artery, or peroneal artery. Technical success was defined as residual stenosis of <30%. Restenosis was defined as two times increase in velocity at the site of treatment. In follow-up, access vessel patency and treated vessel patency were evaluated by physical examination and ultrasound. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess proportional hazards before using the marginal Cox model to determine statistical significance in risk of postintervention occlusion.ResultsIn 53 patients (32 men) with an average age of 67 ± 10.6 years, Rutherford categories were as follows: class 2, n = 1; class 3, n = 37; class 4, n = 5; class 5, n = 12; and class 6, n = 2. Tibial arteries were successfully accessed in all limbs. Lesions were crossed in 56 of 57 limbs. One procedure was terminated because of local arterial dissection. Revascularization was achieved in 55 of 57 limbs. Within 30 days of the procedure, 2 of 2 Rutherford class 6 patients and 1 of 12 class 5 patients needed major amputation because of pre-existing disease. There was no 30-day mortality.Of 103 vessels treated, technical success was achieved in 97 (94%). Secondary patency for 103 vessels was 79% with mean follow-up of 6.66 ± 5.4 months. The primary patency was 90% compared with a primary assisted patency of 51%. There was no statistically significant difference in access vessel primary patency in follow-up: 86% (30/35) for anterior tibial artery, 80% (16/20) for posterior tibial artery, and 100% (2/2) for peroneal artery. In addition, in follow-up, there was no significant difference in incidence of occlusion of target vessels based on choice of access vessel used (P = .109).ConclusionsIn this group of anatomically challenging patients, a retrograde tibial approach was safely used. Accessing the tibial artery does not usually cause access vessel occlusion and resulted in no adverse outcomes. The majority of access vessels remained patent for future bypass if necessary." @default.
• W2912110515 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912110515 creator A5022036254 @default.
• W2912110515 creator A5029812740 @default.
• W2912110515 creator A5050557783 @default.
• W2912110515 creator A5054007799 @default.
• W2912110515 creator A5055159301 @default.
• W2912110515 creator A5057835476 @default.
• W2912110515 creator A5070582781 @default.
• W2912110515 creator A5080674873 @default.
• W2912110515 date "2019-07-01" @default.
• W2912110515 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2912110515 title "Analysis of the retrograde tibial artery approach in lower extremity revascularization in an office endovascular center" @default.
• W2912110515 cites W1810687315 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W1994890725 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W1999853013 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2030986676 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2069475975 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2072657412 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2080166217 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2083827853 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2088731745 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2093274439 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2116311528 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2125545530 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2129327285 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2149335816 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2150956686 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2160800167 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2165559385 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2179022807 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2292310242 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2465000138 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2507362018 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2614310811 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2631016643 @default.
• W2912110515 cites W2738392084 @default.
• W2912110515 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.114" @default.
• W2912110515 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30777690" @default.
• W2912110515 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2912110515 type Work @default.
• W2912110515 sameAs 2912110515 @default.
• W2912110515 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2912110515 countsByYear W29121105152020 @default.
• W2912110515 countsByYear W29121105152021 @default.
• W2912110515 countsByYear W29121105152023 @default.
• W2912110515 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912110515 hasAuthorship W2912110515A5022036254 @default.
• W2912110515 hasAuthorship W2912110515A5029812740 @default.
• W2912110515 hasAuthorship W2912110515A5050557783 @default.
• W2912110515 hasAuthorship W2912110515A5054007799 @default.
• W2912110515 hasAuthorship W2912110515A5055159301 @default.
• W2912110515 hasAuthorship W2912110515A5057835476 @default.
• W2912110515 hasAuthorship W2912110515A5070582781 @default.
• W2912110515 hasAuthorship W2912110515A5080674873 @default.
• W2912110515 hasBestOaLocation W29121105151 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C2776268601 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C2778640784 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C2779967601 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C2910269628 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C126322002 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C126838900 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C141071460 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C2775862295 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C2776268601 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C2778640784 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C2779464278 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C2779967601 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C2910269628 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C500558357 @default.
• W2912110515 hasConceptScore W2912110515C71924100 @default.
• W2912110515 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2912110515 hasLocation W29121105151 @default.
• W2912110515 hasLocation W29121105152 @default.
• W2912110515 hasOpenAccess W2912110515 @default.
• W2912110515 hasPrimaryLocation W29121105151 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2009645173 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2018144414 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2042472674 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2045240138 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2076797679 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2132079435 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2165190532 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2324727488 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2413486660 @default.
• W2912110515 hasRelatedWork W2474158144 @default.
• W2912110515 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W2912110515 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2912110515 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2912110515 magId "2912110515" @default.
• W2912110515 workType "article" @default.