Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912141678> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W2912141678 endingPage "50" @default.
- W2912141678 startingPage "33" @default.
- W2912141678 abstract "The last decade marks the rapid development of dual process theories of higher cognition (Evans, 2007; Evans & Stanovich, 2013 a; 2013 b), i. e. defining the features of intuitive Type 1 and reflective Type 2 processing were separated from their typical correlates, the consensus regarding the use of terminology was reached, and empirical research stimulated the creation of various models of the dual process of conflict resolution. Nevertheless, there is still little knowledge about the general principles of operation of the intuitive Type 1 and the reflective Type 2 processing. Particularly little attention is directed towards the question of interaction between both kinds of processing and their manifestation in a given information processing cycle. The main reason behind this problem is of methodological nature. To date, there are very few methods that both can address this issue and do it in the ecologically valid manner. The most promising model to deal with the aforementioned problem is process dissociation (Jacoby, 1991; Lindsay & Jacoby, 1994), however its use has been thwarted due to the unfavourable historical circumstances. During the period of 1991/1994–2006, the use of the process dissociation method has no firm theoretical basis, because the main principles of dual process theories (and particularly default-interventionist model) were still under discussion, while during the period of 2007–2015, cognitive psychologists used a less ecologically valid form of process dissociation method, which dubiously presupposes the priority of Type 2 processing, although the default-interventionist model highlights the priority of Type 1 processing. This article examines the possibilities of applying the process dissociation method in the context of contemporary dual process theories of higher cognition. It is concluded that the combination of two methods (process dissociation and counterintuitive tasks) may serve as a promising universal research strategy to analyze and mathematically evaluate the interaction of the intuitive Type 1 and the reflective Type 2 processing." @default.
- W2912141678 created "2019-02-21" @default.
- W2912141678 creator A5057261050 @default.
- W2912141678 date "2016-01-15" @default.
- W2912141678 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W2912141678 title "DUAL INFORMATION PROCESSING: DISSOCIATION OF TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 PROCESSES" @default.
- W2912141678 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W2912141678 type Work @default.
- W2912141678 sameAs 2912141678 @default.
- W2912141678 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2912141678 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2912141678 hasAuthorship W2912141678A5057261050 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C102931765 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C147789679 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C547195049 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConcept C87868495 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C102931765 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C111472728 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C138885662 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C147789679 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C15744967 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C169760540 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C169900460 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C180747234 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C185592680 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C188147891 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C41895202 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C547195049 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C77805123 @default.
- W2912141678 hasConceptScore W2912141678C87868495 @default.
- W2912141678 hasIssue "52" @default.
- W2912141678 hasLocation W29121416781 @default.
- W2912141678 hasOpenAccess W2912141678 @default.
- W2912141678 hasPrimaryLocation W29121416781 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W1591816612 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W1742183614 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W1839414379 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2053111235 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2115553239 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2139422967 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2162570137 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2277487124 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W236857775 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2397158229 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2522705615 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2529002410 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2725756207 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2777464354 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2950936039 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W2985815064 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W3090978410 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W3122756471 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W85327460 @default.
- W2912141678 hasRelatedWork W94125841 @default.
- W2912141678 hasVolume "52" @default.
- W2912141678 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2912141678 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2912141678 magId "2912141678" @default.
- W2912141678 workType "article" @default.