FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912195052> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912195052 endingPage "932" @default.
• W2912195052 startingPage "928" @default.
• W2912195052 abstract "Background: Throwing athletes with ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury and symptomatic valgus instability can expect to return to the same or higher level of play. Reconstruction with tendon graft is the dominant method of surgical treatment. Recent evidence suggests that spanning the joint with a suture anchored on both sides is biomechanically equivalent to reconstruction, with faster time to return to play. The authors developed a hybrid UCL reconstruction technique augmented with a suture brace to improve joint stability. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to biomechanically evaluate a hybrid reconstruction technique and compare its performance to reconstruction without augmentation. The authors hypothesized that (1) both groups would lose stability after the simulated tear and regain stability with treatment, (2) the suture augmentation would improve stability, and (3) the addition of the suture anchors near the bone tunnels would not decrease the strength of the hybrid reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten matched pairs of cadaveric arms were dissected to expose the UCL. Each elbow was mounted on a test frame at 90° of flexion. A cyclic valgus rotational torque was applied to the humerus with the UCL in its intact state and repeated in its surgically torn state. Finally, each specimen received either a hybrid reconstruction with suture brace or a reconstruction and was again put through the cyclic protocol, followed by a valgus rotation load-to-fail protocol. Results: Gap formation in the torn state for the reconstruction and hybrid reconstruction groups (0.9 ± 0.1 mm and 0.8 ± 0.1 mm, respectively) was significantly higher ( P = .009 and P = .0002) than in the intact state (0.6 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.3 mm, respectively). After the procedures, the hybrid group showed greater resistance to gapping ( P = .017) as compared with the reconstruction group (0.4 ± 0.2 mm and 0.6 ± 0.1 mm). During load to failure, no hybrid reconstructions failed from bone fracture or screw pullout. No statistical differences were found for failure torque ( P = .058) and stiffness ( P = .101). Gap at 10 N·m was significantly lower ( P = .014) for the hybrid reconstruction group than for the reconstruction group. Conclusion: The current study showed that hybrid reconstruction with suture bracing replicated the time-zero strength of traditional UCL reconstruction and may be more resistant to joint gapping during low cyclic load and load to failure. The combination of the bone tunnels and fixation screw holes did not appear to weaken the construct. Clinical Relevance: This study demonstrated that reconstruction with suture bracing has important time-zero stability and strength as compared with the gold standard of UCL reconstruction. This technique may be useful for throwing athletes who need UCL reconstruction." @default.
• W2912195052 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912195052 creator A5057611237 @default.
• W2912195052 creator A5070288424 @default.
• W2912195052 creator A5071406646 @default.
• W2912195052 creator A5082849157 @default.
• W2912195052 creator A5087971992 @default.
• W2912195052 date "2019-01-28" @default.
• W2912195052 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2912195052 title "Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction With a Modified Docking Technique With and Without Suture Augmentation" @default.
• W2912195052 cites W1517792771 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W1925014352 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W1985418721 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2049522688 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2070893557 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2090726495 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2147601349 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2152325090 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2161382489 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2168647011 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2208276687 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2229632662 @default.
• W2912195052 cites W2579985547 @default.
• W2912195052 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518820304" @default.
• W2912195052 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30689955" @default.
• W2912195052 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2912195052 type Work @default.
• W2912195052 sameAs 2912195052 @default.
• W2912195052 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2912195052 countsByYear W29121950522020 @default.
• W2912195052 countsByYear W29121950522021 @default.
• W2912195052 countsByYear W29121950522022 @default.
• W2912195052 countsByYear W29121950522023 @default.
• W2912195052 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912195052 hasAuthorship W2912195052A5057611237 @default.
• W2912195052 hasAuthorship W2912195052A5070288424 @default.
• W2912195052 hasAuthorship W2912195052A5071406646 @default.
• W2912195052 hasAuthorship W2912195052A5082849157 @default.
• W2912195052 hasAuthorship W2912195052A5087971992 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C2776206872 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C2778565105 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C2779753412 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C2779793219 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C105702510 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C127413603 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C141071460 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C142724271 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C170700871 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C175696284 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C204787440 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C2776206872 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C2778565105 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C2779753412 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C2779793219 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C2781017183 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C2781184374 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C29694066 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C66938386 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C71924100 @default.
• W2912195052 hasConceptScore W2912195052C91762617 @default.
• W2912195052 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2912195052 hasLocation W29121950521 @default.
• W2912195052 hasLocation W29121950522 @default.
• W2912195052 hasOpenAccess W2912195052 @default.
• W2912195052 hasPrimaryLocation W29121950521 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2003292025 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2023059789 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2029290282 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2033178993 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2073713466 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2089987397 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2520596127 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2736605262 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W2912195052 @default.
• W2912195052 hasRelatedWork W4288459184 @default.
• W2912195052 hasVolume "47" @default.
• W2912195052 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2912195052 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2912195052 magId "2912195052" @default.
• W2912195052 workType "article" @default.