FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912245455> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912245455 endingPage "S56" @default.
• W2912245455 startingPage "S56" @default.
• W2912245455 abstract "Theoretical formulations and previous research suggest pain catastrophizing and fear of pain are important variables of consideration in an individual’s pain experience. Unfortunately, methodological limitations of previous studies limit strong conclusions regarding these relationships. We conducted a follow-up study to a previous investigation examining the relationships between fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, and experimental pain perception. One hundred (34 males, 66 females) healthy volunteers completed the Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ-III), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) prior to undergoing the cold pressor test. The CSQ and PCS were completed again following the pain task, with participants instructed to complete these measures based on their experience during the procedure. Measures of pain threshold, tolerance, and intensity were collected during the cold pressor test and served as dependent variables in separate multiple regression models. Sex, pain catastrophizing, and fear of pain were included as predictor variables. With minor variation, we replicated our previous findings in that, after controlling for sex, fear of pain was a consistently stronger predictor of experimental pain in comparison to pain catastrophizing. These results were consistent when separate measures (CSQ versus PCS) and time points (pre-task versus “in-vivo”) of pain catastrophizing were used as predictors. The current findings corroborate those from our previous study and suggest that fear of pain is a stronger predictor of experimental pain perception in comparison to pain catastrophizing. Interestingly, neither the specific measure nor time point of pain catastrophizing assessment influenced the nature of these relationships. Although fear of pain has received less empirical attention than pain catastrophizing, these data are suggestive of its direct and relative importance in the experimental pain experience. The relationships examined herein should be considered in the context of healthy versus clinical samples and acute versus chronic pain conditions. Additional methodological implications are discussed. Theoretical formulations and previous research suggest pain catastrophizing and fear of pain are important variables of consideration in an individual’s pain experience. Unfortunately, methodological limitations of previous studies limit strong conclusions regarding these relationships. We conducted a follow-up study to a previous investigation examining the relationships between fear of pain, pain catastrophizing, and experimental pain perception. One hundred (34 males, 66 females) healthy volunteers completed the Fear of Pain Questionnaire (FPQ-III), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) prior to undergoing the cold pressor test. The CSQ and PCS were completed again following the pain task, with participants instructed to complete these measures based on their experience during the procedure. Measures of pain threshold, tolerance, and intensity were collected during the cold pressor test and served as dependent variables in separate multiple regression models. Sex, pain catastrophizing, and fear of pain were included as predictor variables. With minor variation, we replicated our previous findings in that, after controlling for sex, fear of pain was a consistently stronger predictor of experimental pain in comparison to pain catastrophizing. These results were consistent when separate measures (CSQ versus PCS) and time points (pre-task versus “in-vivo”) of pain catastrophizing were used as predictors. The current findings corroborate those from our previous study and suggest that fear of pain is a stronger predictor of experimental pain perception in comparison to pain catastrophizing. Interestingly, neither the specific measure nor time point of pain catastrophizing assessment influenced the nature of these relationships. Although fear of pain has received less empirical attention than pain catastrophizing, these data are suggestive of its direct and relative importance in the experimental pain experience. The relationships examined herein should be considered in the context of healthy versus clinical samples and acute versus chronic pain conditions. Additional methodological implications are discussed." @default.
• W2912245455 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912245455 creator A5009665125 @default.
• W2912245455 creator A5047624064 @default.
• W2912245455 creator A5058688355 @default.
• W2912245455 creator A5077344604 @default.
• W2912245455 date "2007-04-01" @default.
• W2912245455 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2912245455 title "(821)" @default.
• W2912245455 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2007.02.228" @default.
• W2912245455 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2912245455 type Work @default.
• W2912245455 sameAs 2912245455 @default.
• W2912245455 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2912245455 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912245455 hasAuthorship W2912245455A5009665125 @default.
• W2912245455 hasAuthorship W2912245455A5047624064 @default.
• W2912245455 hasAuthorship W2912245455A5058688355 @default.
• W2912245455 hasAuthorship W2912245455A5077344604 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C112143881 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C2777547206 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C2777953023 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C2781118164 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C33971717 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C3673659 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C112143881 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C126838900 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C15744967 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C169760540 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C1862650 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C26760741 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C2777547206 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C2777953023 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C2781118164 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C33971717 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C3673659 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C42219234 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C70410870 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C71924100 @default.
• W2912245455 hasConceptScore W2912245455C84393581 @default.
• W2912245455 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2912245455 hasLocation W29122454551 @default.
• W2912245455 hasOpenAccess W2912245455 @default.
• W2912245455 hasPrimaryLocation W29122454551 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W1895257458 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W2010974554 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W2017764362 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W2020472495 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W2080880339 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W2083043204 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W2164290858 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W2260615521 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W2811264373 @default.
• W2912245455 hasRelatedWork W3203776393 @default.
• W2912245455 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W2912245455 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2912245455 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2912245455 magId "2912245455" @default.
• W2912245455 workType "article" @default.