Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912255670> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W2912255670 endingPage "1604" @default.
- W2912255670 startingPage "1603" @default.
- W2912255670 abstract "A basic principle of science and civil discourse holds that, since words are inherently limited and ambiguous, one should consider context and interpret another's statements generously. This is especially true when translation between languages is involved. The opposite—to interpret something in the least charitable way—implies prejudice. Clearly the Pope does not wish to “manipulate science” and has not “publicly distorted scientific evidence” as your Editorial states;1The LancetRedemption for the Pope?. 2009; 373: 1054Google Scholar to suggest this calls into question the motives, credibility, and critical thinking of the Editors. As the full transcript shows,2Interview of the Holy Father Benedict XVI during the flight to Africa.http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2009/march/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20090317_africa-interview_en.htmlDate: 17 March 2009Google Scholar the Pope's comments were ethical in nature: they observed—correctly—that an excessive public emphasis on condoms, and the resulting underemphasis on issues of the soul (se non c'è l'anima), personal virtue, and continence, supports an overly casual cultural attitude towards extramarital sex, which is a major contributor to the AIDS epidemic. To paraphrase your own remark: when an influential medical journal makes comments that misrepresent the intentions and statements of religious leaders in ways that could injure the religious health of many millions of people, it should retract or correct the public record. The Editors should seek the causes of their inability to discern the plain meaning and intentions of the Pope. Perhaps this is a clue: Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart. (Eph 4:18). I declare that I have no conflicts of interest." @default.
- W2912255670 created "2019-02-21" @default.
- W2912255670 creator A5023906412 @default.
- W2912255670 date "2009-05-01" @default.
- W2912255670 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2912255670 title "Was the Pope wrong?" @default.
- W2912255670 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60903-x" @default.
- W2912255670 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19427953" @default.
- W2912255670 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2912255670 type Work @default.
- W2912255670 sameAs 2912255670 @default.
- W2912255670 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2912255670 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2912255670 hasAuthorship W2912255670A5023906412 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C107062074 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C2777239683 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C2780822299 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C2780922921 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C2781426162 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C107062074 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C111472728 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C138885662 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C144024400 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C15744967 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C166957645 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C17744445 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C199539241 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C2777239683 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C2779343474 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C2780224610 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C2780822299 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C2780876879 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C2780922921 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C2781426162 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C41895202 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C77805123 @default.
- W2912255670 hasConceptScore W2912255670C95457728 @default.
- W2912255670 hasIssue "9675" @default.
- W2912255670 hasLocation W29122556701 @default.
- W2912255670 hasLocation W29122556702 @default.
- W2912255670 hasOpenAccess W2912255670 @default.
- W2912255670 hasPrimaryLocation W29122556701 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W1557968840 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W2049047242 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W2356425964 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W2358692440 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W2994779114 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W3153976623 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W4311467683 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W598658648 @default.
- W2912255670 hasRelatedWork W1693323792 @default.
- W2912255670 hasVolume "373" @default.
- W2912255670 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2912255670 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2912255670 magId "2912255670" @default.
- W2912255670 workType "article" @default.