FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912377389> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912377389 endingPage "S119" @default.
• W2912377389 startingPage "S117" @default.
• W2912377389 abstract "Introduction: Colonoscopy is the preferred procedure for prevention of colorectal cancer by detecting its precursor lesion, adenomas. However, several studies have reported an adenoma miss rate of 10-25% despite technical improvements in endoscopic techniques. Adenoma detection rate(ADR) is an important quality indicator for colonoscopies. Water assisted colonoscopy has been shown to reduce patient discomfort and also improve ADR marginally and there are 2 techniques that are used - water immersion(WI) and water exchange(WE). However there is no meta-analysis comparing ADR between the 2 techniques. Methods: Comprehensive literature search was performed in EMBASE, Scopus, Pubmed, Cochrane databases from 1946 to May 31, 2017 to identify potential articles. MeSH headings included in the search included adenoma detection rate, colonoscopy, water exchange, water immersion, water assist. All references from the identified articles were further searched to find more articles. Studies were included if they were randomized clinical trials(RCT) and reported ADR on cohorts of patients undergoing colonoscopy with WE and WI techniques. Odds ratio of ADR and cecal intubation time were compared between WE and WI. Statistics were done using Revman version 5.3. Results: A total of 128 articles were identified from the search strategy and from articles identified through references and abstracts. A total of 4 RCT studies met the inclusion criteria. Total number of patients included in the analysis was 2229 (1110 in WE group, 1119 in WI group). WE technique improved ADR when compared to WI technique and the results were statistically significant (1.31; 95% CI 1.10-1.55) (image 1). There was no heterogeneity between the studies (I2=0%). Three studies reported mean cecal intubation time and the use of WE increased the cecal intubation time by an average of 4.82 minutes (95% CI 4.19-5.46) or 4 minutes 49 seconds (image 2). Conclusion: WE technique is superior to WI technique with respect to adenoma detection rate. However, the disadvantage of WE in terms of longer cecal intubation time should be taken into account in interpretation of these results. Given that all the 4 studies were RCT and no heterogeneity between the studies, the results of this study are important in current clinical context, as ADR is the most important colonoscopy quality indicator.Figure: Adenoma detection rate.Figure: Mean difference of cecal intubation time." @default.
• W2912377389 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912377389 creator A5010129498 @default.
• W2912377389 creator A5024754600 @default.
• W2912377389 creator A5045976248 @default.
• W2912377389 creator A5059363048 @default.
• W2912377389 creator A5065140448 @default.
• W2912377389 date "2017-10-01" @default.
• W2912377389 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2912377389 title "Adenoma Detection Rate During Colonoscopy With Water Exchange Technique in Comparison With Water Immersion Technique: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies" @default.
• W2912377389 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201710001-00221" @default.
• W2912377389 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2912377389 type Work @default.
• W2912377389 sameAs 2912377389 @default.
• W2912377389 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2912377389 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912377389 hasAuthorship W2912377389A5010129498 @default.
• W2912377389 hasAuthorship W2912377389A5024754600 @default.
• W2912377389 hasAuthorship W2912377389A5045976248 @default.
• W2912377389 hasAuthorship W2912377389A5059363048 @default.
• W2912377389 hasAuthorship W2912377389A5065140448 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C2777428134 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C121608353 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C126322002 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C141071460 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C156957248 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C168563851 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C17744445 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C199539241 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C2777428134 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C2778435480 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C2779473830 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C526805850 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C71924100 @default.
• W2912377389 hasConceptScore W2912377389C95190672 @default.
• W2912377389 hasLocation W29123773891 @default.
• W2912377389 hasOpenAccess W2912377389 @default.
• W2912377389 hasPrimaryLocation W29123773891 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W1492928134 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W2026099883 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W2059370519 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W2156620229 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W2168556626 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W2969433987 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W2990964965 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W3023314329 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W3114384252 @default.
• W2912377389 hasRelatedWork W4309663817 @default.
• W2912377389 hasVolume "112" @default.
• W2912377389 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2912377389 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2912377389 magId "2912377389" @default.
• W2912377389 workType "article" @default.