FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912486649> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912486649 abstract "The current state of dialogue technology has come a long way since its beginning in the 1950s: dialogue technology now provides interactive service agents, while research explores various aspects of multimodal and multiparty communication so as to improve natural and social aspects of dialogue systems. In this workshop, interest is focussed especially on dialogue systems able to act as Companions, i.e. software agents with advanced human language technology capacities, able to display and recognise emotion and aspects of personality as well as to interact with a user, possibly over a long period, learning about their needs and interests, performing services, entertaining, consoling, and so on. The focus of the workshop is on text and speech aspects of dialogue with Companions, but topics to be discussed also include the impact of non-dialogue phenomena (e.g., presence, low-level control and recognition, avatar technology, etc.) on dialogue and the interaction of other modalities with dialogue.Dialogue technology has two main historical sources, both still of relevance today: first, the chatbot tradition going back at least to ELIZA and PARRY and, secondly, the task-driven knowledge-based system back to at least BASEBALL and SHRDLU, all these examples being from the late 1960s. The great chatbots of the past, which bear little relationship to the current rash of Internet products, did have some claim to companionableness of a sort, and e.g. PARRY had explicit emotion parameters of fear and anger that affected its outputs. The chatbots sometimes left initiative with the user (like ELIZA which initiated nothing) and sometimes with the system (like PARRY, who had long paranoid stories to tell if given a chance). The task-based systems, however, aimed at efficient task completion with little attention paid to the social or emotional aspects of interaction. The initiative was always with the user and the system was regarded as a tool or servant with no goal other than to answer or carry out a task as efficiently it could.The two kind of systems gave rise to quite different forms of evaluation as well: the chatbots led to the sophisticated but artificial Turing Test environment of the Loebner competition, while the funded and deployed task-systems --- of which the best known were the MIT airline reservation systems like PEGASUS and JUPITER --- were evaluated in competitions in terms of time and completion of task rates. However, comparison between systems and their performance proved difficult; no generally applicable and agreed evaluation framework or methodology is available for the companionable systems we are interested in this workshop. A central question then is whether it is possible to measure companionship, and if so, whether is it possible to include some aspects of it in the evaluation of dialogue systems?" @default.
• W2912486649 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912486649 creator A5050719415 @default.
• W2912486649 creator A5057661726 @default.
• W2912486649 creator A5082314268 @default.
• W2912486649 date "2010-07-15" @default.
• W2912486649 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2912486649 title "Proceedings of the 2010 Workshop on Companionable Dialogue Systems" @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1503944387 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1523135049 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1529005580 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W156644685 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1583650837 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1588072535 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1592970009 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1594579113 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1624616554 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1889376738 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1966797434 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1968630830 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1975879668 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1992119553 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2014902591 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2045883408 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2059858941 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2066267321 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2125480788 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2144960579 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2150755857 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2152207611 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2167854178 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W225404700 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W26963497 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W2912913215 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W3041214984 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W70340092 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W98144779 @default.
• W2912486649 cites W1522358004 @default.
• W2912486649 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2912486649 type Work @default.
• W2912486649 sameAs 2912486649 @default.
• W2912486649 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2912486649 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912486649 hasAuthorship W2912486649A5050719415 @default.
• W2912486649 hasAuthorship W2912486649A5057661726 @default.
• W2912486649 hasAuthorship W2912486649A5082314268 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C168725872 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C173853756 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C190954187 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C2776608160 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C2778975910 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C2779041454 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C127413603 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C136764020 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C144024400 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C154945302 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C158154518 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C166957645 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C168725872 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C173853756 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C17744445 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C190954187 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C199539241 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C201995342 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C2776608160 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C2778975910 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C2779041454 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C2780451532 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C36289849 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C41008148 @default.
• W2912486649 hasConceptScore W2912486649C95457728 @default.
• W2912486649 hasLocation W29124866491 @default.
• W2912486649 hasOpenAccess W2912486649 @default.
• W2912486649 hasPrimaryLocation W29124866491 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W1553059461 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2006460022 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2056506950 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2100614229 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2273056884 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2293218459 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2405187948 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2567251299 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2580366892 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2743607297 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2759874916 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2800373251 @default.
• W2912486649 hasRelatedWork W2960994197 @default.

• next