FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912546566> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912546566 endingPage "323" @default.
• W2912546566 startingPage "314" @default.
• W2912546566 abstract "Abstract This study evaluated the basal area growth of Norway spruce stands subjected to different management strategies; specifically, even-aged (EA) stands treated with thinning from below and uneven-aged (UEA) stands treated with selective cutting. Analysis was based on extensive empirical data obtained from permanent long-term experiments established in 23 even-aged and 26 uneven-aged Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands in Southern and Central Finland. The specific goals were to determine whether there are differences in: (a) the relationship between the stocking level and the stand basal area growth, (b) the stand basal area growth rates at a given stocking level, and (c) the stand basal area growth responses to cuttings between EA and UEA stands. A model-based approach was adopted in the analysis. Modelling was used to describe general trends and patterns in the data, emphasising the effects of overall stand density, cutting intensity, and management strategy on post-treatment stand growth. A model for a stand basal-area growth was fitted as a mixed linear model to the pooled data from EA and UEA stands. Model simulations were conducted to elucidate how the treatment of stands affects the predicted stand basal area growth. The analysis revealed a clear general effect of stocking level on stand basal area growth for all data. Growth increased with increasing stocking density. There was a significant difference in the stand basal area growth of EA stands and UEA stands. The growth of UEA stands was ca. 20% smaller than that of EA stands. There were also major differences in the timing and magnitude of the growth response to cutting between EA and UEA stands. Post treatment growth was noticeably slower in UEA stands than in EA stands, especially during the first 10 years after cutting. The results clearly show that the growth response of the trees remaining in EA stands is faster and greater than that in UEA stands, enhancing the stand basal area growth." @default.
• W2912546566 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912546566 creator A5012349186 @default.
• W2912546566 creator A5037715670 @default.
• W2912546566 creator A5047410540 @default.
• W2912546566 creator A5080929879 @default.
• W2912546566 date "2019-04-01" @default.
• W2912546566 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2912546566 title "Growth response to cuttings in Norway spruce stands under even-aged and uneven-aged management" @default.
• W2912546566 cites W1958744209 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W1977109346 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W1991497992 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2007075137 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2042751741 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2060664746 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2065523820 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2085961794 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2118731101 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2122442935 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2147711832 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2169362870 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2494778954 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2570079253 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2590671040 @default.
• W2912546566 cites W2783299378 @default.
• W2912546566 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.032" @default.
• W2912546566 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2912546566 type Work @default.
• W2912546566 sameAs 2912546566 @default.
• W2912546566 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2912546566 countsByYear W29125465662019 @default.
• W2912546566 countsByYear W29125465662020 @default.
• W2912546566 countsByYear W29125465662021 @default.
• W2912546566 countsByYear W29125465662022 @default.
• W2912546566 countsByYear W29125465662023 @default.
• W2912546566 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912546566 hasAuthorship W2912546566A5012349186 @default.
• W2912546566 hasAuthorship W2912546566A5037715670 @default.
• W2912546566 hasAuthorship W2912546566A5047410540 @default.
• W2912546566 hasAuthorship W2912546566A5080929879 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConcept C187528503 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConcept C2775966360 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConcept C2777427081 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConcept C28631016 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConceptScore W2912546566C187528503 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConceptScore W2912546566C18903297 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConceptScore W2912546566C205649164 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConceptScore W2912546566C2775966360 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConceptScore W2912546566C2777427081 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConceptScore W2912546566C28631016 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConceptScore W2912546566C59822182 @default.
• W2912546566 hasConceptScore W2912546566C86803240 @default.
• W2912546566 hasLocation W29125465661 @default.
• W2912546566 hasOpenAccess W2912546566 @default.
• W2912546566 hasPrimaryLocation W29125465661 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W1539103540 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W2052571765 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W2067416582 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W2324691408 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W2397753351 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W2912546566 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W2944606165 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W2995108907 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W3194884809 @default.
• W2912546566 hasRelatedWork W3150286211 @default.
• W2912546566 hasVolume "437" @default.
• W2912546566 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2912546566 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2912546566 magId "2912546566" @default.
• W2912546566 workType "article" @default.