FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2912777116> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2912777116 abstract "Countries around the world are debating ways to better limit online copyright infringement (OCI) without unduly harming Internet freedoms. Courts and policymakers have focused so far on the substantive rights that must be balanced before implementing any measure to limit OCI: Are users' privacy rights preserved? Will the mechanism hurt freedom of expression? Is the measure too costly for Internet intermediaries to implement? Are users' procedural rights protected? Will the measure have other undesirable side effects on innovation and the Internet ecosystem? Relatively little attention has been paid to institutional and regulatory aspects, and in particular whether lawmakers could entrust a regulatory authority with the task of balancing these competing interests. In the UK and France, lawmakers have entrusted an independent regulatory authority with tasks associated with limiting OCI. In the United States, a private organization, the Center for Copyright Information (CCI), has assumed a quasi-regulatory role modelled after the French HADOPI. Even the Librarian of Congress, via its jailbreaking rules, plays a role affecting OCI. If we were to imagine an regulatory framework for dealing with OCI, what would it look like? The paper examines several existing regulatory approaches for OCI, as well as the European regulatory framework for electronic communications, and attempts to propose an regulatory model. The paper argues that a proper application of the proportionality test for OCI measures requires a dynamic and forward-looking approach, and that a regulatory authority is best placed to do this. Finding the right balance in a given situation requires technical expertise, a close observation of the market and frequent updating of regulatory solutions as markets evolve. The framework requires that the regulatory authority use a light touch, but that the authority have a full set of tools at its disposal and be able to reach all kinds of Internet intermediaries. The regulatory authority should give preference to voluntary stakeholder solutions and impose mandatory measures only as a last resort. The paper proposes three bodies of rules that would form the basis for the regulatory framework, and concludes by mentioning obstacles that may make the ideal model difficult to implement." @default.
• W2912777116 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2912777116 creator A5030937690 @default.
• W2912777116 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2912777116 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2912777116 title "A Regulatory Framework for Dealing with Online Copyright Infringement (OCI)" @default.
• W2912777116 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2025332" @default.
• W2912777116 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2912777116 type Work @default.
• W2912777116 sameAs 2912777116 @default.
• W2912777116 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2912777116 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2912777116 hasAuthorship W2912777116A5030937690 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C139569457 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C2991908516 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C108827166 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C110875604 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C136764020 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C139569457 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C144133560 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C162324750 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C162853370 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C17744445 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C190253527 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C2991908516 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C3116431 @default.
• W2912777116 hasConceptScore W2912777116C41008148 @default.
• W2912777116 hasLocation W29127771161 @default.
• W2912777116 hasOpenAccess W2912777116 @default.
• W2912777116 hasPrimaryLocation W29127771161 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W14255013 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W1506388719 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W1733473146 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2145436295 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2296531233 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2356774858 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2561419550 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2592265615 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2898202105 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2913379466 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2981883849 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W2983359759 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W3024460114 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W3130828518 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W3156140188 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W3175178243 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W3176938767 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W41288032 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W54832798 @default.
• W2912777116 hasRelatedWork W3121321096 @default.
• W2912777116 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2912777116 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2912777116 magId "2912777116" @default.
• W2912777116 workType "article" @default.