FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2913116103> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2913116103 endingPage "71" @default.
• W2913116103 startingPage "71" @default.
• W2913116103 abstract "The degree of tooth enamel wear is an important aspect of the clinical acceptability of all-ceramic restorations. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of enamel wear by feldspathic porcelain and polymer-infiltrated ceramic.In this in vitro study, 10 polymer-infiltrated ceramics were prepared by creating the sections of Vita Enamic® blocks (18 mm × 14 mm × 4 mm). A total of 10 porcelain cylinders were built, and feldspathic porcelain (VMK 95, Vita) was used and fired over the metal discs. A total of 20 human maxillary premolars were assigned as antagonist. Then, 10 teeth were arranged and placed oppose to porcelain samples and 10 others were placed oppose to polymer-infiltrated-ceramic specimens in the chewing simulator. The samples were photographed before and after the chewing simulation. The difference between the two photograph was measured by stereomicroscope and Motic Image plus software 2.0 three times, and then, the mean of these three times was recorded as the amount of wear. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and SPSS version 16. The level of significancy was 0.05.The mean wear rate teeth oppose to the feldspathic porcelain group (377.294 μ) was significantly higher than that of the polymer-infiltrated ceramic group (101.755 μ) (P = 0.002).In the present study, the amount of enamel wear of the natural teeth opposed to polymer-infiltrated ceramic was significantly lower than feldspathic porcelain." @default.
• W2913116103 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2913116103 creator A5019770691 @default.
• W2913116103 creator A5040985318 @default.
• W2913116103 creator A5084233441 @default.
• W2913116103 date "2019-01-01" @default.
• W2913116103 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2913116103 title "Comparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelainComparison the degree of enamel wear behavior opposed to Polymer-infiltrated ceramic and feldspathic porcelain" @default.
• W2913116103 cites W1656024121 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W1972085843 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W1981498402 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W1992701853 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2004968110 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2007904697 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2009053284 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2022128148 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2056348277 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2067306961 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2068370373 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2070005013 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2072555428 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2074342648 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2074853694 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2082143314 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2091188304 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2095335548 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2097301460 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2111067287 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2142226488 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2143698411 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2156268256 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2165374512 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W2168267301 @default.
• W2913116103 cites W4252717723 @default.
• W2913116103 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.250972" @default.
• W2913116103 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6364353" @default.
• W2913116103 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30820199" @default.
• W2913116103 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2913116103 type Work @default.
• W2913116103 sameAs 2913116103 @default.
• W2913116103 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2913116103 countsByYear W29131161032019 @default.
• W2913116103 countsByYear W29131161032020 @default.
• W2913116103 countsByYear W29131161032021 @default.
• W2913116103 countsByYear W29131161032022 @default.
• W2913116103 countsByYear W29131161032023 @default.
• W2913116103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2913116103 hasAuthorship W2913116103A5019770691 @default.
• W2913116103 hasAuthorship W2913116103A5040985318 @default.
• W2913116103 hasAuthorship W2913116103A5084233441 @default.
• W2913116103 hasBestOaLocation W29131161031 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConcept C134132462 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConcept C155977592 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConcept C156887251 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConceptScore W2913116103C134132462 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConceptScore W2913116103C155977592 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConceptScore W2913116103C156887251 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConceptScore W2913116103C159985019 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConceptScore W2913116103C192562407 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConceptScore W2913116103C199343813 @default.
• W2913116103 hasConceptScore W2913116103C71924100 @default.
• W2913116103 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2913116103 hasLocation W29131161031 @default.
• W2913116103 hasLocation W29131161032 @default.
• W2913116103 hasOpenAccess W2913116103 @default.
• W2913116103 hasPrimaryLocation W29131161031 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W1948422923 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W2086231008 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W2109800844 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W2281145519 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W2380293314 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W2471906060 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W2943188944 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W3082440218 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W4366431979 @default.
• W2913116103 hasRelatedWork W1820871642 @default.
• W2913116103 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W2913116103 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2913116103 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2913116103 magId "2913116103" @default.
• W2913116103 workType "article" @default.