FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2913123835> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2913123835 endingPage "2296" @default.
• W2913123835 startingPage "2270" @default.
• W2913123835 abstract "Purpose This study identifies an effective communication strategy for promoting restaurants’ green efforts to customers by using different types of green advertisement messages. This study aims to investigate the relative persuasiveness of attribute-based versus benefit-based appeal messages in green restaurant advertisements and their matching effect with different types of green practices in the restaurant (environment-focused green practices vs food-focused green practices) and with different types of restaurants (fine dining vs fast casual dining) on customers’ attitude and visiting intention toward green restaurants. Furthermore, the study examines a moderating effect of restaurant types to assess whether the matching effects between types of messages and types of green practices work differently within the different types of restaurants. Design/methodology/approach A 2 (attribute-based vs benefit-based messages) × 2 (food-focused vs environment-focused green practices) × 2 (fast casual vs fine dining restaurants) between-subject experimental design was used to test the proposed hypotheses. An online scenario-based survey was developed and distributed to online panel members in the USA. Ultimately, 363 responses were used for data analyses. ANOVA and t-test were conducted to analyze the data. Findings The results indicate that benefit-based messages are generally more persuasive than attribute-based messages in green restaurant advertisements. For restaurants with food-focused green practices, an advertising message emphasizing the benefit of food-focused green practices (benefit-based message) would be more effective than an advertising message describing their tangible efforts to show the greenness of the restaurant (attribute-based message). For fine dining restaurants, a green advertisement with benefit-based information would be more persuasive than attribute-based information. This study further showed that the aforementioned interaction effect between types of green practices and types of messages was salient for fine dining restaurants. Originality/value This research is one of the few studies in restaurant management to examine the green communication effectiveness in terms of the types of green practices and the types of advertising message framing. By comparing the relative persuasiveness of green advertisements on consumers’ attitudes and behavior intentions, this study provides suggestions for restaurant professionals to make effective green communication strategies based on the type of green practices the restaurant primarily uses and the type of restaurant the manager is operating." @default.
• W2913123835 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2913123835 creator A5007681511 @default.
• W2913123835 creator A5019792283 @default.
• W2913123835 date "2019-06-10" @default.
• W2913123835 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2913123835 title "The effect of message framings and green practices on customers’ attitudes and behavior intentions toward green restaurants" @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1483180551 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1507578198 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1563919154 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1974350996 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1975402733 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1981573740 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1982114175 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1985654917 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W1987410733 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2003685176 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2011013382 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2023540936 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2024414001 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2029625943 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2036424369 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2036887088 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2050251515 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2073733140 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2075876923 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2085756167 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2089457241 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2092066179 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2094904783 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2095050257 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2102231444 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2106508561 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2108860923 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2117330166 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2126789885 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2130950828 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2141708418 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2148235194 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2157399030 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2158996140 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2168398923 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W2507786764 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W4232476263 @default.
• W2913123835 cites W4249532312 @default.
• W2913123835 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-05-2018-0386" @default.
• W2913123835 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2913123835 type Work @default.
• W2913123835 sameAs 2913123835 @default.
• W2913123835 citedByCount "49" @default.
• W2913123835 countsByYear W29131238352019 @default.
• W2913123835 countsByYear W29131238352020 @default.
• W2913123835 countsByYear W29131238352021 @default.
• W2913123835 countsByYear W29131238352022 @default.
• W2913123835 countsByYear W29131238352023 @default.
• W2913123835 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2913123835 hasAuthorship W2913123835A5007681511 @default.
• W2913123835 hasAuthorship W2913123835A5019792283 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C165064840 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C2781426162 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C105795698 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C112698675 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C144133560 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C151730666 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C15744967 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C159985019 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C162853370 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C165064840 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C192562407 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C2777267654 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C2781426162 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C33923547 @default.
• W2913123835 hasConceptScore W2913123835C86803240 @default.
• W2913123835 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2913123835 hasLocation W29131238351 @default.
• W2913123835 hasOpenAccess W2913123835 @default.
• W2913123835 hasPrimaryLocation W29131238351 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W1524733545 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W2011830309 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W2032560097 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W2041492649 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W2068085562 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W2126494875 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W2550282063 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W3013396681 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W3188879075 @default.
• W2913123835 hasRelatedWork W596917334 @default.

• next