Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2913258575> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2913258575 endingPage "232596711881983" @default.
- W2913258575 startingPage "232596711881983" @default.
- W2913258575 abstract "Background: Knee positions involved in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have been studied via analysis of injury videos. Positions of high ACL strain have been identified in vivo. These methods have supported different hypotheses regarding the role of knee abduction in ACL injury. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare knee abduction angles measured by 2 methods: using a 3-dimensional (3D) coordinate system based on anatomic features of the bones versus simulated 2-dimensional (2D) videographic analysis. We hypothesized that knee abduction angles measured in a 2D videographic analysis would differ from those measured from 3D bone anatomic features and that videographic knee abduction angles would depend on flexion angle and on the position of the camera relative to the patient. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Models of the femur and tibia were created from magnetic resonance images of 8 healthy male participants. The models were positioned to match biplanar fluoroscopic images obtained as participants posed in lunges of varying flexion angles (FLAs). Knee abduction angle was calculated from the positioned models in 2 ways: (1) varus-valgus angle (VVA), defined as the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the femoral transepicondylar axis by use of a 3D anatomic coordinate system; and (2) coronal plane angle (CPA), defined as the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the long axis of the femur projected onto the tibial coronal plane to simulate a 2D videographic analysis. We then simulated how changing the position of the camera relative to the participant would affect knee abduction angles. Results: During flexion, when CPA was calculated from a purely anterior or posterior view of the joint—an ideal scenario for measuring knee abduction from 2D videographic analysis—CPA was significantly different from VVA ( P < .0001). CPA also varied substantially with the position of the camera relative to the participant. Conclusion: How closely CPA (derived from 2D videographic analysis) relates to VVA (derived from a 3D anatomic coordinate system) depends on FLA and camera orientation. Clinical Relevance: This study provides a novel comparison of knee abduction angles measured from 2D videographic analysis and those measured within a 3D anatomic coordinate system. Consideration of these findings is important when interpreting 2D videographic data regarding knee abduction angle in ACL injury." @default.
- W2913258575 created "2019-02-21" @default.
- W2913258575 creator A5002610041 @default.
- W2913258575 creator A5019944707 @default.
- W2913258575 creator A5030267170 @default.
- W2913258575 creator A5052148020 @default.
- W2913258575 creator A5068529223 @default.
- W2913258575 creator A5078657153 @default.
- W2913258575 date "2019-01-01" @default.
- W2913258575 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2913258575 title "A Comparison of Knee Abduction Angles Measured by a 3D Anatomic Coordinate System Versus Videographic Analysis: Implications for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury" @default.
- W2913258575 cites W1511506129 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W1956932842 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W1975679084 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W1984419833 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W1994110560 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W1998234963 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2014853956 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2024519509 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2027661558 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2033309624 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2044397371 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2045237589 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2050751779 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2056325830 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2060438357 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2069275527 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2069793151 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2078936766 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2093233295 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2100078404 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2101208345 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2111454286 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2119766390 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2130423606 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2134110849 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2139301287 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2144473619 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2150695348 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2154062345 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2165338149 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2169820603 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2233960312 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2557996893 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2802726266 @default.
- W2913258575 cites W2891305551 @default.
- W2913258575 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118819831" @default.
- W2913258575 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6350144" @default.
- W2913258575 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30729143" @default.
- W2913258575 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
- W2913258575 type Work @default.
- W2913258575 sameAs 2913258575 @default.
- W2913258575 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W2913258575 countsByYear W29132585752019 @default.
- W2913258575 countsByYear W29132585752020 @default.
- W2913258575 countsByYear W29132585752021 @default.
- W2913258575 countsByYear W29132585752022 @default.
- W2913258575 countsByYear W29132585752023 @default.
- W2913258575 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2913258575 hasAuthorship W2913258575A5002610041 @default.
- W2913258575 hasAuthorship W2913258575A5019944707 @default.
- W2913258575 hasAuthorship W2913258575A5030267170 @default.
- W2913258575 hasAuthorship W2913258575A5052148020 @default.
- W2913258575 hasAuthorship W2913258575A5068529223 @default.
- W2913258575 hasAuthorship W2913258575A5078657153 @default.
- W2913258575 hasBestOaLocation W29132585751 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C13483470 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C2777236700 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C2780554211 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C2781170992 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C2908736133 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C2987592631 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C105702510 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C126838900 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C13483470 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C141071460 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C143409427 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C2777236700 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C2778434673 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C2780554211 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C2781017183 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C2781170992 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C2908736133 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C29694066 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C2987592631 @default.
- W2913258575 hasConceptScore W2913258575C71924100 @default.
- W2913258575 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2913258575 hasLocation W29132585751 @default.
- W2913258575 hasLocation W29132585752 @default.
- W2913258575 hasLocation W29132585753 @default.