FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2914011034> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2914011034 endingPage "S264" @default.
• W2914011034 startingPage "S264" @default.
• W2914011034 abstract "Introduction: Colonoscopy is the fundamental screening tool used to detect colorectal polyps and colorectal cancer. Many techniques are being developed to increase visualization and improve adenoma detection rate (ADR). Antispasmodic agents are used in intravenous form to inhibit peristalsis during colonoscopy. Limited data suggest beneficial effects of topical administration of peppermint oil, containing L-menthol, including diminished smooth muscle contraction, decreased endoscopic procedural time and improved ADR. We aimed to assess whether use of peppermint oil during screening colonoscopy improves visualization and increases patient satisfaction, as well as ADR. Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients scheduled for screening colonoscopy were randomly assigned to either receive peppermint oil or placebo. Insertion of the colonoscope to the cecum was performed as standard practice and, once in the cecum, 50ml of peppermint oil solution or placebo containing normal saline was gently sprayed into the lumen. During withdrawal, the endoscopist graded colonic peristalsis, spasticity, and visibility while assessing for colon lesions. Quality measures including bowel preparation, withdrawal time and number of polyps removed were recorded. Additional data on demographics and procedural details were documented and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum and Chi-square tests. Results: Preliminary data from 28 patients were analyzed. Thirteen patients were randomized to receive peppermint oil. Age, gender, and BMI were comparable between the two groups. Average Boston Bowel Preparation Score was overall excellent (mean 7.9 ±1.2 for drug vs 8.3 ±1.0 for placebo). Withdrawal time tended to be less in the group that received the drug (9.8 min vs. 10.9 min) with shorter overall procedure time (18.3 min vs 21.7 min, p= 0.56). With use of peppermint oil, ADR was 32.1% compared with 37.5% in controls (p=0.37). Assessment of spasticity, peristalsis and visualization did not differ in the two groups. Patient satisfaction evaluated by perception of pain and willingness to repeat the procedure was equally high in both groups. Conclusion: Our initial data on the use of peppermint oil in screening colonoscopy suggests no significant impact on peristalsis, patient satisfaction, or ADR. Decrease in procedure time may be a surrogate marker for improved visibility with additional patients currently being recruited to further explore our hypothesis." @default.
• W2914011034 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2914011034 creator A5032103810 @default.
• W2914011034 creator A5062853863 @default.
• W2914011034 creator A5065788958 @default.
• W2914011034 creator A5080770439 @default.
• W2914011034 date "2017-10-01" @default.
• W2914011034 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2914011034 title "Use of Peppermint Oil During Screening Colonoscopy to Improve Visibility" @default.
• W2914011034 doi "https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201710001-00501" @default.
• W2914011034 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2914011034 type Work @default.
• W2914011034 sameAs 2914011034 @default.
• W2914011034 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2914011034 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2914011034 hasAuthorship W2914011034A5032103810 @default.
• W2914011034 hasAuthorship W2914011034A5062853863 @default.
• W2914011034 hasAuthorship W2914011034A5065788958 @default.
• W2914011034 hasAuthorship W2914011034A5080770439 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C27081682 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C2778451229 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C2778494295 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C121608353 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C126322002 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C141071460 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C142724271 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C168563851 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C204787440 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C27081682 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C2778435480 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C2778451229 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C2778494295 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C526805850 @default.
• W2914011034 hasConceptScore W2914011034C71924100 @default.
• W2914011034 hasLocation W29140110341 @default.
• W2914011034 hasOpenAccess W2914011034 @default.
• W2914011034 hasPrimaryLocation W29140110341 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2026099883 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2036036873 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2048257934 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2054589950 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2065105205 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2321073905 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2907890661 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2913591326 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W2922483458 @default.
• W2914011034 hasRelatedWork W4310297009 @default.
• W2914011034 hasVolume "112" @default.
• W2914011034 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2914011034 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2914011034 magId "2914011034" @default.
• W2914011034 workType "article" @default.