FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2914237362> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2914237362 endingPage "1607" @default.
• W2914237362 startingPage "1592" @default.
• W2914237362 abstract "Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a relatively new method to image the spatial distribution of magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) tracers administered to the body with high spatial and temporal resolution using an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The spatial information of the MNP's is encoded using a field free point (FFP), or a field free line (FFL), in which the magnetic field vanishes at a point, or on a line, respectively. FFL scanning has the advantage of improved sensitivity compared to FFP scanning as a result of higher signal-to-noise ratio. The trajectory traversed by the FFL or FFP is an important parameter of the MPI system and should be selected to achieve the best imaging quality in minimum scan time, while considering hardware constraints and patient safety. In this study, we analyzed the image quality of different FFL trajectories for a large field of view (FOV) using simulations, to provide a baseline information for FFL scanning MPI system design.We simulated a human-sized FFL scanning MPI configuration to image a circular FOV with 160 mm diameter, and compared Radial, Spiral, Uniform Spiral, Flower, and Lissajous trajectories with different trajectory densities scanned by the FFL for constant scan time. We analyzed the system matrices of the trajectories in terms of mutual coherence and homogeneity of the spatial sensitivity. We calculated the maximum electric fields induced on a homogeneous conductive body by the selection field (SF) and the focus field (FF) to compare the trajectories based on the nerve stimulation threshold. The images were obtained using the system matrix reconstruction approach with two different image reconstruction methods. In the first one, we used the conventional image reconstruction method, algebraic reconstruction technique (ART), which gives a regularized least-squares solution. In the second one, we used the state-of-the-art alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), which minimizes a weighted sum of the l1 -norm and the total variation (TV) of the images.The Radial and Spiral trajectories resulted in a poor imaging performance at low trajectory densities due to relatively high coherency and poor sensitivity of the measurements, respectively. For ART reconstruction, the highest image quality with the lowest trajectory density was achieved with the Uniform Spiral trajectory. Uniform Spiral, Flower, and Lissajous trajectories yielded comparable performance with ADMM reconstruction. The rotating SF induced higher electric field amplitude compared to the FF. Consequently, maximum allowable gradient at the same trajectory density was greater for the Radial trajectory compared to the other trajectories.For a large FOV coverage, the Uniform Spiral trajectory offers a good compromise between image quality and imaging time, taking safety and hardware limitations into account. The Radial trajectory, especially using l1 -norm and TV priors in the reconstruction, may be favorable in case the SF induced electric field is higher than that of the FF at the same frequency (e.g., relatively small FOV coverage). In general, ADMM reconstruction resulted in higher contrast and resolution compared to ART, leading to lighter requirements on the density of the trajectory." @default.
• W2914237362 created "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2914237362 creator A5013478181 @default.
• W2914237362 creator A5016552760 @default.
• W2914237362 creator A5033612193 @default.
• W2914237362 creator A5043745756 @default.
• W2914237362 date "2019-02-22" @default.
• W2914237362 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2914237362 title "Trajectory analysis for field free line magnetic particle imaging" @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1501596991 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1527754360 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1530601547 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1540248569 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1608175339 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1964488279 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1980173245 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1983277479 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1983289347 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W1993734631 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2001898851 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2004988775 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2007068462 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2025685946 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2030348272 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2031852422 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2035603561 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2041981588 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2054699716 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2088656686 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2097542629 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2105569079 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2116762695 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2120361645 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2133665775 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2141151788 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2151752675 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2153372540 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2275153700 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2423620120 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2481820990 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2564723496 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2565792844 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2588306107 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2605093401 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2607206317 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2654795342 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2728873564 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2761103503 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2763104417 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W2851212652 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W3104442000 @default.
• W2914237362 cites W4230184048 @default.
• W2914237362 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13411" @default.
• W2914237362 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30695100" @default.
• W2914237362 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2914237362 type Work @default.
• W2914237362 sameAs 2914237362 @default.
• W2914237362 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2914237362 countsByYear W29142373622019 @default.
• W2914237362 countsByYear W29142373622020 @default.
• W2914237362 countsByYear W29142373622021 @default.
• W2914237362 countsByYear W29142373622022 @default.
• W2914237362 countsByYear W29142373622023 @default.
• W2914237362 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2914237362 hasAuthorship W2914237362A5013478181 @default.
• W2914237362 hasAuthorship W2914237362A5016552760 @default.
• W2914237362 hasAuthorship W2914237362A5033612193 @default.
• W2914237362 hasAuthorship W2914237362A5043745756 @default.
• W2914237362 hasBestOaLocation W29142373621 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C115260700 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C13662910 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C140722275 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C142259097 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C155672457 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C205372480 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C207168407 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C21200559 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C24326235 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConcept C87023908 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C115260700 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C115961682 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C119857082 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C120665830 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C121332964 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C127413603 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C1276947 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C13662910 @default.
• W2914237362 hasConceptScore W2914237362C140722275 @default.

• next