FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2916071746> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2916071746 endingPage "8" @default.
• W2916071746 startingPage "8" @default.
• W2916071746 abstract "Background: There is not enough information related to the accuracy of nursing and collaborative diagnoses established by nurses in psychiatric setting in Indonesia.Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the correspondence between nursing and collaborative diagnoses established and predicted by nurses.Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study which employed 81 nurse respondents. Data were collected in 2013 using two types of questionnaires. The rst questionnaire was used to identify the most frequent nursing and collaborative diagnoses encountered by the nurses. The second questionnaire was used to identify data which were most frequently identi ed by the nurses. The second questionnaire was developed based on the sequence in the Intan’s Screening Diagnosis Assessment (ISDA).Results: The results indicated that there were 46 nursing diagnosis labels established by the nurses. Of the 46 nursing diagnosis labels, only 13 (28.26%) corresponded precisely to the labels in North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) taxonomy (2012-2014) of nursing diagnoses. As many as 11 diagnoses (23.91%) could be included as key concepts (or diagnostic foci) in NANDA taxonomy. However, these nursing diagnosis labels did not written correctly as in NANDA labels. There were also 22 diagnosis (47%) labels not listed in NANDA taxonomy.Conclusion: The majority of nursing diagnosis labels did not match with nursing diagnosis labels in NANDA taxonomy. ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Belum banyak informasi terkait akurasi diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang dibuat perawat dalam setting keperawatan jiwa di Indonesia.Tujuan: Tujuan dari peneltian ini untuk mengidenti kasi kesesuaian antara diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang sudah ditegakkan dan yang diduga oleh perawat. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan cross sectional yang melibatkan 81 responden perawat. Data dikumpulkan pada tahun 2013 menggunakan 2 kuesioner. Kuesioner pertama digunakan untuk mengetahui diagnosis keperawatan dan kolaboratif yang paling sering ditegakkan oleh perawat. Kuesioner kedua digunakan untuk mengidenti kasi data yang paling sering ditemukan oleh perawat. Kuesioner kedua dikembangkan berdasarkan Intan’s Screening Diagnosis Assessment (ISDA).Hasil: Dari hasil penelitian didapati terdapat 46 label diagnosis keperawatan dibuat oleh perawat. Dari 46 label diagnosis keperawatan hanya 14 label diagnosis (28,26%) yang sesuai dengan label diagnosis berdasarkan taxonomi North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) (2012-2014). Sebanyak 11 diagnosis (23,91%) dapat tercakup sebagai konsep penting (atau fokus diagnostik) dalam taksonomi NANDA. Namun label diagnosis keperawatan tersebut tidak dituliskan secara benar sesuai label NANDA. Selain itu ada juga 22 label diagnosis yang dituliskan tidak sesuai taksonomi NANDA.Kesimpulan: Mayoritas label diagnosis keperawatan yang dituliskan perawat tidak sesuai dengan label diagnosis keperawatan dalam taksonomi NANDA." @default.
• W2916071746 created "2019-03-02" @default.
• W2916071746 creator A5031291268 @default.
• W2916071746 creator A5059620825 @default.
• W2916071746 creator A5075035986 @default.
• W2916071746 date "2017-10-16" @default.
• W2916071746 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2916071746 title "Perbandingan Antara Diagnosis yang Sering Ditegakkan dan Possible Diagnosis yang Diprediksikan oleh Perawat Pada Klien dengan Gangguan Jiwa" @default.
• W2916071746 doi "https://doi.org/10.22146/jkkk.29011" @default.
• W2916071746 hasPublicationYear "2017" @default.
• W2916071746 type Work @default.
• W2916071746 sameAs 2916071746 @default.
• W2916071746 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2916071746 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2916071746 hasAuthorship W2916071746A5031291268 @default.
• W2916071746 hasAuthorship W2916071746A5059620825 @default.
• W2916071746 hasAuthorship W2916071746A5075035986 @default.
• W2916071746 hasBestOaLocation W29160717461 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConcept C2779033854 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConceptScore W2916071746C142724271 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConceptScore W2916071746C159110408 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConceptScore W2916071746C2779033854 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConceptScore W2916071746C534262118 @default.
• W2916071746 hasConceptScore W2916071746C71924100 @default.
• W2916071746 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2916071746 hasLocation W29160717461 @default.
• W2916071746 hasOpenAccess W2916071746 @default.
• W2916071746 hasPrimaryLocation W29160717461 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W2033305465 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W2047961700 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W2213986711 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W2334566656 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W2373293328 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W2414775711 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W2531838944 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W3048408111 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W3203208877 @default.
• W2916071746 hasRelatedWork W656335389 @default.
• W2916071746 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W2916071746 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2916071746 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2916071746 magId "2916071746" @default.
• W2916071746 workType "article" @default.