FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2916219914> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2916219914 abstract "Background . A significant role in solving the problem of renal replacement therapy should be played by kidney transplantation, which is now widely regarded as the optimal method for treating end-stage renal failure. An important problem remains the survival of the graft, and therefore it is necessary to find the most optimal method for diagnosing the earliest lesion of the graft. Objective . Examine the possibility of using glomerular filtration rate calculated by the Cockcroft–Gault (C&G) and EPI formulas to assess renal allograft function. Design and methods . 216 patients with functioning renal allograft were examined, among them 92 women and 124 men, the average age was 56.8 ± 12.8 years. All patients completed: determination of serum creatinine level (Cr) (mmol/l), determination of the level of daily proteinuria (g/day), calculation of glomerular filtration rate using the formula EPI (ml/min) and Cockcroft–Gault formula (ml/min). All patients received immunosuppressive therapy. Results . We divided patients into 4 groups: 1 — patients without daily proteinuria with serum creatinine (Cr) < 0.110 mmol/l, 2 — patients without daily proteinuria with Cr > 0.110 mmol/l, 3 — patients with daily proteinuria less than 0.15 g/day with Cr < 0.110 mmol/l, 4 — patients with daily proteinuria more than 0.15 g/day with Cr > 0.110 mmol/l. The average Cr level was in the group 1 — 0.093 ± 0.001 mmol/l, in 2 — 0.162 ± 0.005 mmol/l, and 0.081 ± 0.002 mmol/l, and 0.135 ± 0.012 mmol/l in 3 and 4 groups, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate Cockcroft–Gault and EPI, respectively, in group 1 — 82.1 ± 4.4 ml/min and 74.9 ± 3.7 ml/min, in 2 — 55.3 ± 2.9 ml/min and 46.8 ± 2.4 ml/min, at 3 — 79.4 ± 2.8 ml/min and 71.1 ± 2.5 ml/min, at 4 — 51.2 ± 1.6 ml/min and 42.5 ± 1.2 ml/min. Сr level is not a sufficiently accurate indicator of allograft dysfunction, as in group 1 it was significantly higher than in group 3 (p < 0.01), exactly the same picture was observed when comparing groups 2 and 4. At the same time, glomerular filtration rate using the Cockcroft–Gault formula and EPI formula was slightly higher in group 3 and 4 compared with group 1 and 2. Conclusion . Calculating glomerular filtration rate using the Cockcroft–Gault formula and EPI formula is a more sensitive method for assessing renal allograft dysfunction." @default.
• W2916219914 created "2019-03-02" @default.
• W2916219914 creator A5081515653 @default.
• W2916219914 creator A5083629337 @default.
• W2916219914 date "2019-02-21" @default.
• W2916219914 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2916219914 title "CLINICO-LABORATORY CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING DYSFUNCTION OF KIDNEY ALLOTRASPLAT FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF IMMUNOSUPRESS SCHEMES IN THE EARLY AND REMOTE PERIODS AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION" @default.
• W2916219914 doi "https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2018-5-6-5-9" @default.
• W2916219914 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W2916219914 type Work @default.
• W2916219914 sameAs 2916219914 @default.
• W2916219914 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2916219914 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2916219914 hasAuthorship W2916219914A5081515653 @default.
• W2916219914 hasAuthorship W2916219914A5083629337 @default.
• W2916219914 hasBestOaLocation W29162199141 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C159641895 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C2779561371 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C2780091579 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C2780303639 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C2780306776 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C2911091166 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C126322002 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C126894567 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C159641895 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C2779561371 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C2780091579 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C2780303639 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C2780306776 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C2911091166 @default.
• W2916219914 hasConceptScore W2916219914C71924100 @default.
• W2916219914 hasLocation W29162199141 @default.
• W2916219914 hasOpenAccess W2916219914 @default.
• W2916219914 hasPrimaryLocation W29162199141 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W1883633 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W4095175 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W4891276 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W4978709 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W6401070 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W7133913 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W8426097 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W8848305 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W967485 @default.
• W2916219914 hasRelatedWork W5450286 @default.
• W2916219914 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2916219914 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2916219914 magId "2916219914" @default.
• W2916219914 workType "article" @default.