Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2916916103> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 59 of
59
with 100 items per page.
- W2916916103 abstract "This work examines the foundations of judicial review. By doing so, it explores theconstitutional and institutional capacity of the reviewing court. The reason for this is thatcourt decisions have infused new vigour into judicial review by moving it away fromformalistic concerns of jurisdiction. Nevertheless the extent of such judicial enthusiasm isshrouded in controversy. Too often judgments are based on standards that transcend theparticular case, leading to complex and even contradictory decisions. Further, it cannot bedenied that principles are ignored and stare decisis is flouted towards the end of ''justiceof the case. Any occasional judicial incursion into matters formally within the purviewof the original decision-maker's realm is justified as a necessary and acceptableconsequence of fulfilling this essential task.Further, changes in patterns of governance through privatization, contracting-out, selfregulationand the like have served to blur the traditional distinction between the publicand private sphere. The cross fertilization gives rise to accountability concerns becauseotherwise, private actors can muscle their way into the traditional state machinerywithout much fanfare. This forwards serious questions in relation to rights enforcementand how judicial review can be invoked in the public-private interaction.These questions will continue to rage unless the foundational parameters are clarified. Ifthe courts are constitutionally and institutionally competent, any controversies withregards its role will be extinguished. It will also be impetus towards developing a corpusof constitutional review, one that evolves with contemporary insight of the constitution.The focus is not whether the courts should decide all controversies or not, but how it canfunction as a mechanism of accountability in the interaction between the constitutionalactors. This work concludes by showing that if the constitutional principles are clarified,then the constitutional actors will cease the current power play and instead work inpartnership towards actualizing effective enjoyment of rights.The law is as at 30 April 2004." @default.
- W2916916103 created "2019-03-02" @default.
- W2916916103 creator A5053426312 @default.
- W2916916103 date "2004-01-01" @default.
- W2916916103 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W2916916103 title "Reviewing judicial review: constitutional and institutional competence / Jayanthi Naidu" @default.
- W2916916103 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2916916103 type Work @default.
- W2916916103 sameAs 2916916103 @default.
- W2916916103 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2916916103 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
- W2916916103 hasAuthorship W2916916103A5053426312 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C2778757428 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C48764862 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConcept C81819989 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C144024400 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C17744445 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C190253527 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C199539241 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C2776007630 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C2776154427 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C2776949292 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C2778757428 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C48764862 @default.
- W2916916103 hasConceptScore W2916916103C81819989 @default.
- W2916916103 hasLocation W29169161031 @default.
- W2916916103 hasOpenAccess W2916916103 @default.
- W2916916103 hasPrimaryLocation W29169161031 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W130071985 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W1513773429 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W158681799 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W1866055588 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W196209918 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W20478582 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W2468433075 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W2772212654 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W2989977388 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W3016425896 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W3121868815 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W3123575465 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W3123602616 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W3123633661 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W3123857167 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W3199406140 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W1795015915 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W1800100602 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W209377408 @default.
- W2916916103 hasRelatedWork W3121671609 @default.
- W2916916103 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2916916103 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2916916103 magId "2916916103" @default.
- W2916916103 workType "dissertation" @default.