FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2916958355> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2916958355 endingPage "124" @default.
• W2916958355 startingPage "118" @default.
• W2916958355 abstract "OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is characterized by high levels of conformity and steep dose gradients from the periphery of the target to surrounding tissue. Clinical studies have backed up the importance of these factors through evidence of symptomatic complications. Available data suggest that there are threshold doses above which the risk of symptomatic radionecrosis increases with the volume irradiated. Therefore, radiosurgical treatment plans should be optimized by minimizing dose to the surrounding tissue while maximizing dose to the target volume. Several metrics have been proposed to quantify radiosurgical plan quality, but all present certain weaknesses. To overcome limitations of the currently used metrics, a novel metric is proposed, the efficiency index (η 50% ), which is based on the principle of calculating integral doses: η 50% = integral dose TV /integral dose PIV50% . METHODS The value of η 50% can be easily calculated by dividing the integral dose (mean dose × volume) to the target volume (TV) by the integral dose to the volume of 50% of the prescription isodose (PIV50%). Alternatively, differential dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the TV and PIV50% can be used. The resulting η 50% value is effectively the proportion of energy within the PIV50% that falls into the target. This value has theoretical limits of 0 and 1, with 1 being perfect. The index combines conformity, gradient, and mean dose to the target into a single value. The value of η 50% was retrospectively calculated for 100 clinical SRS plans. RESULTS The value of η 50% for the 100 clinical SRS plans ranged from 37.7% to 58.0% with a mean value of 49.0%. This study also showed that the same principles used for the calculation of η 50% can be adapted to produce an index suitable for multiple-target plans (Gη 12Gy ). Furthermore, the authors present another adaptation of the index that may play a role in plan optimization by calculating and minimizing the proportion of energy delivered to surrounding organs at risk (OARη 50% ). CONCLUSIONS The proposed efficiency index is a novel approach in quantifying plan quality by combining conformity, gradient, and mean dose into a single value. It quantifies the ratio of the dose “doing good” versus the dose “doing harm,” and its adaptations can be used for multiple-target plan optimization and OAR sparing." @default.
• W2916958355 created "2019-03-02" @default.
• W2916958355 creator A5002857673 @default.
• W2916958355 creator A5076260173 @default.
• W2916958355 date "2018-12-01" @default.
• W2916958355 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2916958355 title "A novel index for assessing treatment plan quality in stereotactic radiosurgery" @default.
• W2916958355 cites W1872520013 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W1946116870 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W1964369546 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W1970625453 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W1974029992 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2009217240 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2017298571 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2022234082 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2071476556 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2085921073 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2115478848 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2117187257 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2139792111 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2142064307 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2149710876 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2156244949 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2159314579 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2161676344 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2169943019 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2183101157 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2192104003 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2317170212 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2323926621 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2599896783 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2610443202 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2796422842 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2800669945 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W4232342702 @default.
• W2916958355 cites W2182128029 @default.
• W2916958355 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.7.gks18694" @default.
• W2916958355 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30544322" @default.
• W2916958355 hasPublicationYear "2018" @default.
• W2916958355 type Work @default.
• W2916958355 sameAs 2916958355 @default.
• W2916958355 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2916958355 countsByYear W29169583552019 @default.
• W2916958355 countsByYear W29169583552020 @default.
• W2916958355 countsByYear W29169583552021 @default.
• W2916958355 countsByYear W29169583552022 @default.
• W2916958355 countsByYear W29169583552023 @default.
• W2916958355 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2916958355 hasAuthorship W2916958355A5002857673 @default.
• W2916958355 hasAuthorship W2916958355A5076260173 @default.
• W2916958355 hasBestOaLocation W29169583551 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C20556612 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C2780198649 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C105795698 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C121332964 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C126838900 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C201645570 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C20556612 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C2776291640 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C2780198649 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C2780387249 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C2989005 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C33923547 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C509974204 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C62520636 @default.
• W2916958355 hasConceptScore W2916958355C71924100 @default.
• W2916958355 hasIssue "Suppl1" @default.
• W2916958355 hasLocation W29169583551 @default.
• W2916958355 hasLocation W29169583552 @default.
• W2916958355 hasOpenAccess W2916958355 @default.
• W2916958355 hasPrimaryLocation W29169583551 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W1000633033 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W1500316510 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W1602881370 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W2005363427 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W2053511483 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W2119269467 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W2157135744 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W2382885693 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W2765703828 @default.
• W2916958355 hasRelatedWork W2910913922 @default.
• W2916958355 hasVolume "129" @default.
• W2916958355 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2916958355 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2916958355 magId "2916958355" @default.
• W2916958355 workType "article" @default.